No. 137
               
            
            
            
            
               I regret to state that no small amount of injury has
               undoubtedly been caused to the Colony of 
British Columbia by
               the owners of the Steam Boats, which are now, and have been for
               some time past running on 
Fraser's River.
               
               These individuals are citizens of the United States and they
               oppress alike the 
Miner
Miner and the Merchant by their exorbitant
               charges for passage and freight.
               
               2.  The rate now levied for the transport of a Ton of goods
               from this place to 
Fort Hope is Seventy-two dollars, or more
               than £14 Sterling.  The charge made last summer when I possessed
               the power of regulating prices was Twenty-five dollars or £5 a
               ton from this place to 
Fort Yale, which is fifteen miles of
               difficult navigation beyond 
Fort Hope, and large profits were
               made at that rate.
               
               I fear the owners are now continuing to perpetuate the
               evil by taking out British Registers for their vessels, by means
               of transfers to British Subjects which 
there
there is every reason to
               believe are only nominal and fictitious, although all the
               requirements of the law being complied with it is difficult to
               establish legal proof of that fact.
               
               3.  In this part of the world competition is not allowed
               to produce its legitimate effects; it is the practice to buy up
               every rival line or to pay them handsomely for allowing their
               ships to be idle, and the public are charged a higher rate to
               cover the additional expense which their oppressions have incurred.
               
            
            
               The American Pacific Mail Steam Ship Company is a notable
               example of this method of proceeding, this Company having
               hitherto bought off every line 
established
established to compete with it.
               I will instance another case.  Last year a Steamboat called the
               "
Maria" was started on the Sacramento River in opposition to the
               Boats of I believe the California Steam Navigation Company.  She
               was bought off by that Company.  Her proprietor immediately brought her
               up to this place to run on 
Fraser's River, buying off another boat which
               he, on arrival found on the River, and sending this second boat down to
               
San Francisco to commence another opposition on the Sacramento River
               in order to be again bought off.
               
               4.  The Victoria Steam Navigation Company, a British Company,
               who have one large River Steamer employed between 
this
this port and
               
Langley, are now engaged in building a smaller vessel for the
               higher navigation of 
Fraser's River.  The Directors of this
               Company lately applied to me for the protection of Government
               against the machinations of these Foreign speculators.  I
               commented upon the extravagant rate of freight and suggested a
               large reduction as the best means of meeting their competitors,
               whereupon the Directors offered to provide vessels in sufficient
               numbers to perform the whole transport business on 
Fraser's River
               at the rate of Twenty-five Dollars or £5 Sterling a ton,
               provided they were secured against these, in reality American
               owners of British registered 
vessels
vessels, in the exclusive privilege
               of navigating the River until the end of next 
September.
               
               Monopoly would in such a case be a public gain, but being
               illegal I could not entertain the proposal, though I cannot but
               regret that under such circumstances I have no power by which I
               could protect the public interest.
               
            
            
               5.  The Directors further assured me that they had been
               invited by the American Owners to join in the combination for
               maintaining the high rates of freight; but as the Directors
               declined making the Statement in writing no legal use could be
               made of it.
               
            
            
               6.  The Government 
legal
legal authorities here are of opinion that
               we have no power to refuse the change of Register from American
               to British even for vessels employed in British Inland waters.
               
               7.  I transmit a copy of two letters from the Secretary of
               the before mentioned company, and as the matter is one of much
               importance to the interests of the Colony, as well as being a
               National question, I should feel obliged if it were submitted for
               the opinion of the Law Officers of the Crown, and that I may be
               informed whether I should be justified in withholding a British
               Register from Vessels becoming British under such 
circumstances
circumstances
               as those described, which appear to me simply an evasion of the law.
               
               Minutes by CO staff
               
                
                  
                  
                     Mr Merivale
                     Would you think it useful to refer this 
desph &c to the
                     Board of Trade before any other steps are taken with it?
                     
 
                  
                  
                  
                  
                  
                     This might be the best course?  The question seems an awkward one.
                     
                  
                  
                   
               
               
                  
                  
                     To the B
d of Trade at once—requesting from them the
                     earliest answer.  I think that the papers might, to save time
                     
wh is valuable at the present season, be simultaneously
                     referred to the Law Officers asking them for an early
                     reply 
wh wd be communicated to 
Govr Douglas by the 
16th.
                     
 
                
            
            
            
               Other documents included in the file
               
                
                  
                  
                     Draft, 
Merivale to 
J. Booth, Board of Trade, 
8 June 1859,
                     forwarding copy of the despatch for consideration.
                     
 
                  
                  
                     Draft, 
Merivale to Attorney General and Solicitor General, 
8 June
                        1859, forwarding copy of the despatch for consideration.
                     
 
            
            
            
               Documents enclosed with the main document (not transcribed)
               
               
               
                
                  
                  
                     Thain and 
Murray to 
Douglas, 
7 April 1859, stating that
                     foreign steamboat owners were taking out British
                     registers for their vessels.