Booth to Merivale (Permanent Under-Secretary)
Office of Committee of Privy Council for Trade,
Whitehall
7 April 1859
Sir,
I am directed by the Lords of the Committee of Privy
Council for Trade to acknowledge the receipt of your letter
of the 31
st Ultimo, transmitting copies of two Despatches
from the Governor of
British Columbia calling attention to
the urgent necessity for the
erectionerection of Lighthouses in
Fucas
Straits, and the approaches to the
Harbour of Esquimalt, and
stating that as the Colonial Office cannot apply to Parliament
for a grant of money for these necessary public works and as the
Colony has not at present the means of paying for them,
Sir E.B.
Lytton is desirous of being informed whether My Lords cannot
include the required Lighthouses within "the class of Imperial
Lights," and give the Colony
somesome assistance towards their
erection out of the funds placed at their disposal for such services.
In reply My Lords direct me to state that, whilst there
can be no doubt of the importance of the proposed Lights,
they are required for the Trade of the Colony, and not, as
in the case of the Lights in the Bahamas and elsewhere, for
the Trade which merely passes the Colony.
Under these circumstances they are Lights which should,
My
LordsLords think, if practicable, be erected and maintained
by and at the cost of the Colony rather than the Home Government.
But even if the Lights in question could be said to
belong to the class of Imperial Lights, i.e. of Lights which
the Home Government is bound to erect or maintain for the
purposes of the general passing Trade, their Lordships could
still have no funds at their disposal out of which to erect
or maintain them.
The only
The only funds out of which My Lords can pay the
expenses of Colonial Lights are first, sums raised by levying
Tolls under the Act 18 & 19 Vict: c. 91, and secondly,
sums voted by Parliament.
The present case does not appear to be one in which it
is desirable to levy Tolls under the Act in question, since
the only Trade which would pay the Tolls is the Trade of
the Colony and the Colony can itself, if so disposed, levy
Tolls on account of the Lights
in itsin its own Ports.
And as regards monies voted by Parliament it is to be
observed that the only votes are votes taken by the Treasury
on the responsibility of this Department for the services of
special Lighthouses mentioned in the votes.
If, notwithstanding the fact that these Lights cannot
be classed as Imperial Lights, the circumstances of the
Colony of
British Columbia are such as to make it proper
that these Lights should be erected
withwith Imperial instead
of Colonial Funds, those circumstances are matters within
the cognizance of the Colonial Office rather than of this
Department; and if it is thought right that a vote for the
purpose should be taken by the Treasury, the vote should
My Lords think be taken on the responsibility of the Colonial
Office, and the application to the Treasury for the
purpose should be made by that Office.
If it should be decided
to taketo take a vote for the purpose My Lords
will be glad to give their best advice and assistance in the matter.
At the same time they could not without obtaining further
local information state with accuracy and certainty what the
expense to be incurred in the Colony in erecting these Lights will be.
A copy of a further memorandum by
Captain Sulivan, R.N.
on the character and probable
costcost of these Lights is
enclosed for
Sir E.B. Lytton's information.
Minutes by CO staff
Mr Merivale
The reasoning of the Board of Trade seems irresistible: &
the question resolves itself into two considerations. Is the
case sufficiently strong to justify
Sir E. Lytton in recommending
the T-y to take a vote for setting up the lights
or
should we tell the Governor we cannot help him, & that if lights
are so necessary he must himself raise the funds for the purpose.
The view I take is adverse to an application to Parlt
for as the trade is only a Colonial one, & at present moderate
in extent, it will be difficult to support the request by
reference to those general principles which guide Parlt in
granting funds for Colonial Lights. If this is a correct view
the alternative is to adjourn the establishment of the Lights
until the Colony can itself find the means of paying for them.
And perhaps this is the most wholesome policy in the end.
I have no doubt the B
d of Trade is right in
saying that it is
our business at the Colonial Office to put
the expense of these lights on our estimates, if they are to
be paid for out of Imperial funds at all.
I suppose therefore
the subject must be adjourned, although it is a pity that
the Americans have so much the start of us.
Meanwhile the Admiralty & the Bd of Trade will write
officially to us on the subject.
Other documents included in the file
B.J. Sulivan, memorandum on the necessity of installing the lights.
Sulivan to [
Merivale],
12 April, 1859, expressing his conviction
that the lighthouses should be installed with or without the financial
support of the home government.
Minutes by CO staff
Ld Carnarvon
Capt Sulivan of the B
d of Trade is very anxious about
these lighthouses and with good reason. He says the loss of a single
vessel would cost this country very probably much more than their
expense, and moreover we stand in
discredit as compared with the
Americans.
I told him our difficulty with respect to any addition to our
B. Col. Estimates, but said that
if the Admiralty took on
themselves, to urge it as a question of public security we might
be perhaps persuaded.
Or if he could suggest any way of fairly
throwing it on the colony, we might write by Mail of 15
th.
He has accordingly sent here this note which might serve (if
you think proper) as the basis of a despatch to the Governor. You
see
the cost is reduced to 7000, i.e. for
two lights only.
The B
d of Trade will write to us—also Admiralty on this
subject. But
Capn Sulivan requests that his note to
Mr
Merivale may be regarded only in the light of a private communication
& not to be used officially.