No. 29
16 June 1862
I have had the honor to receive your despatch N
o 112 of the
17th March last referring to the appointment of
Mr A.T.
Bushby as "Registrar General" of
British Columbia, under the
"British Columbia Land Registry Act 1861" and calling for certain
further
further information in connection with this appointment.
2. With reference thereto, I beg to acquaint your Grace that
upon the appointment of
Mr Bushby to the Office of Registrar
General he was relieved from his duties as Registrar of the Supreme
Court, and another gentleman (
Mr G.C. Mathew as already reported)
was selected to perform them.
It appears in the periodical Returns but the appointment should
have been separately reported.
The continuation
of of the two offices
is not practicable, from the fact that the principal Office of the
Registrar General must be at the Capital, and that either he or his
deputy must be constantly present, while the Registrar of the Supreme
Court is for probably more than six months in the year and at uncertain
periods, absent from the Capital on Circuit with the Judge. To explain
this the more fully as well as to exhibit
the the varied duties of the
Registrar of the Supreme Court, I enclose copy of a letter—dated the
4th February 1861 addressed to me by
Mr Begbie, bearing testimony
to the value of
Mr Bushby's services as Registrar of the Supreme
Court and soliciting for him an increase of salary. It was owing
to this and to previous and subsequent strong recommendations from
Mr Begbie, that I was induced to select
Mr Bushby for the very
responsible Office of
"Registrar "Registrar General."
3. With regard to the Salary, Five Hundred Pounds per annum,
I assure your Grace that in this country it is really not justly
commensurate to the responsibility of the Office. It cannot, indeed,
be considered equivalent to a salary of Three hundred Pounds per
annum in England, for although at present at
New Westminster the
common articles of food are moderately cheap—that is to say Beef
is 1
s/- per
pound pound, and Bread -/4
d per lb—yet House Rent,
and Servants wages, and many other necessary requirements, are so
extravagantly high, an ill built wooden tenement, not containing
the accommodation afforded in England by a brick house of from
£15 to £20 annual rental, commanding a rent of £120 per annum,
and a very ordinary servant being difficult to obtain at
the the wages
of £84 a year while the cost of washing is from 6
s/- to 8
s/-
dozen. I trust your Grace will pardon my entering into these
particulars, but I do so to shew that in fixing salaries, as well
as in all other matters of expenditure, I have endeavoured to
practice the strictest economy compatible with enabling the Officers
of the Government to live as gentlemen.
4. In reply to your Grace's
enquiry enquiry as to whether a Deputy
Registrar is necessary for the execution of the provisions of the
Law, I have the honor to acquaint you that up to the present time
no such appointment has been made. As business increases and
Registration extends, such an Officer will be indispensable, but
as a present expedient, the Registrar General forming the
whole whole
of the Establishment and the services of a second person being
requisite to compare the copies registered with the Original deeds,
I have authorized the employment of the Attorney General's Clerk,
granting him an allowance at the rate of £50 per annum for the
extra duty imposed upon him, which I believe is the most economical
arrangement it is possible to adopt.
5. From the date of
opening opening the Office
1st Novr 1861, till the end of the
last month there have been registered 163 Deeds containing 78,300 words or 783 folios of 100
words each, and the business of the office is steadily on the increase.
I have the honor to be
My Lord Duke,
Your Grace's most obedient
humble Servant
James Douglas
Minutes by CO staff
Sir F. Rogers
If it is decided that the
Govr has assigned sufficient
grounds for the separate appointments of Registrar of the Supreme
Court & Registrar General of Land Titles the first step will be
to send the correspondence to the Treasury with reference to
976 and recommend approval?
Documents enclosed with the main document (not transcribed)
Begbie to
Douglas,
4 February 1861, recommending a salary
increase for
Bushby, whose conduct had given "every satisfaction."
Other documents included in the file
Draft,
Rogers to
G.A. Hamilton, Treasury,
30 August 1862,
forwarding copy of the despatch and recommending the proposed
salary of £500 be approved.