Colonial Despatches
The colonial despatches of Vancouver Island and British Columbia 1846-1871
Despatch from London
Pelham-Clinton, 5th Duke of Newcastle Henry Pelham Fiennes to
Douglas, Sir James 10 February 1863, NAC :, 322.
Abstract
Pelham-Clinton, 5th Duke of Newcastle Henry Pelham Fiennes to
Douglas, Sir James 10 February 1863, NAC :, 322.
Despatch from London.
Other documents (1).
No. 10
10 February 1863
Sir,
I have the honor to transmit to you for your Report a copy of a
letter addressed to me by Mr. Charles Walkem dated Montreal 12th
January, respecting his son's claim to be admitted to the Bar of British
Columbia.
With reference toyour
your despatch No. 65 of the 6th of January 1859
I have to observe to you that if it is requisite to admit Barristers of
the United States to practice in British Columbia it appears much more
requisite to admit Canadian Barristers.
your despatch No. 65 of the 6th of January 1859
I have to observe to you that if it is requisite to admit Barristers of
the United States to practice in British Columbia it appears much more
requisite to admit Canadian Barristers.
Mr. Justice Begbie in his letter of the 29th December 1859 enclosed
in your despatch to which I have referred, seems to treat the questionas
as one of reciprocity and argues that because British Columbia
Barristers are not admitted to practice in Canada, Canadian Barristers,
ought not to be admitted to practice in British Columbia.
as one of reciprocity and argues that because British Columbia
Barristers are not admitted to practice in Canada, Canadian Barristers,
ought not to be admitted to practice in British Columbia.
But I have to observe that it is clear that this question ought not
to be treated with reference to the personal interests of barristers,
but tothe
the benefit of the public, and that it is clearly for the benefit
of the British Columbian public in the present state of society, that
men of legal knowledge and respectable character should be encouraged by
all means to practice law before the Supreme Court, whether that
knowledge has been acquired in Great Britain, in British Columbia
itself, or in Canada.
the benefit of the public, and that it is clearly for the benefit
of the British Columbian public in the present state of society, that
men of legal knowledge and respectable character should be encouraged by
all means to practice law before the Supreme Court, whether that
knowledge has been acquired in Great Britain, in British Columbia
itself, or in Canada.
Other documents included in the file
Copy, Walkem to Newcastle, 12 January 1863, respecting Walkem's "son's claim to be admitted to the Bar of British
Columbia," includes the certificate appointing George Anthony Walkem to the "Bar of Upper Canada."