By the 8 Clause of his Instructions, he, like other
Governors, is directed to consult his Executive Council in
all cases excepting when 1. The matters in question shall
be of such a nature, that, in his judgement the Queen's
service would suffer material prejudice from such consultation or
2. Shall be too unimportant
to require their advice or
3. Too urgent to admit of such advice being asked for from
the Council before the time within which it may be necessary
to act in such matter: in which latter case the
Govr is,
at the earliest practicable period, to communicate to the
Council the measures which he may have adopted with the
reasons thereof.
To these provisions
Mr Seymour objects that the first
direction "tends to diminish the unity of
the Government,"
and that the 3
rd invites "the criticism of his own Public
Officers on the Governor's Acts." What he means by the
destruction of the Unity of his Government is perhaps not
very plain; but the chief object in establishing an Executive
Council, the Members of which are sworn to advise the
Governor faithfully, was, that in all important matters he
should be aided, but not governed, by their advice. He is
allowed
a free discretion as to those subjects which he may
consider too unimportant to require their advice.
No question is to be brought before the Council for
their advice (Clause 9) or decision excepting those only
which may be proposed by the Governor himself for that
purpose, and he may even then act in opposition (Clause 10)
to their opinions by reporting to the Secretary of State
the grounds for so doing. A member may, as the Governor
points out, request him (Clause 9) by writing to propose any
question
for debate and such application and the answer
thereto are to be recorded in the Minutes.
The Governor is instructed by Clause 4 to communicate
to the Council the B. Instructions themselves, and likewise
such others, from time to time, in the execution of which
their consent and concurrence are requisite, "and which
you shall find convenient for Our Service to be imparted to them."
He could hardly be directed to do less, but
Mr Seymour
appears to take exception at that provision.
These provisions form a part of the general Instructions
to every Governor who has to act with an established Executive
Council. I have never before known such exceptions taken,
and it appears to me that if the Council is to be anything more than a
mere formality the Members could not have less freedom of action.
I agree with
Mr Gairdner that this is an unnecessary difficulty,
and I
shd be inclined to let
Mr Seymour see by the tone
of the ans
r that
Mr Cardwell thought it so.
Ackn
e observe that the Instructions leave it to the
Govr to judge for himself when the advantage of the public
service requires him to act with
t consulting his Ex
e Council
and that it is impossible for
Mr C. with
t reference to a
particular case to say whether
Mr S. will be right or
wrong in giving a large interpretation to the
Instructions,
add however that it is undoubtless intended that the necessity
of communicating his proceedings to his Council should have
the effect of rendering him circumspect in those proceedings
but that this necessity has not been found to be productive
of difficulty or inconvenience in any other Colony.