Sir F. Rogers
                     I should explain to you that Adverting to the expression in
                     my minute on 6411 that 
Govr Seymour was becoming profuse in his
                     exp
re Mr Cardwell observed to me orally that he was
                     reluctant to pass this Ordinance (N
o 9) to the Treasury without
                     some remark to that effect.  I, therefore, withdraw the papers
                     in the hope that the Estimates, & certain explanatory enclosures
                     which ought to have accompanied the Gov
rs despatch & which
                     were promised by a succeeding Mail, would arrive.  But they
                     have not come even now.  In the interval I have discussed the
                     Ordinance with 
Mr Buckland, the Colonial Clerk, at the Treasury;
                     & he is very clear in his opinion that the T-y will not take
                     this Ord
ce into consideration without the Estimates. He
                     suggests that we 
shd write for them.  Shall we do so at
                     once, or shall we make an official reference to the T-y & get
                     their ans
r in black & white?  I consider that 
Govr Seymour is
                     much to blame for sending the case home in an incomplete state,
                     after the

 notice taken of a similar omission last year, & I
                     am not clear that our friend, 
Birch, is not open to the same remark.
                     
 
                  
                  
                     With respect to the question of "profusion" which by the
                     way, may be too strong a phrase, I can add nothing more than
                     what I have stated in my Minute on 8234 which I send to you with this.