Sir F. Rogers
I should explain to you that Adverting to the expression in
my minute on 6411 that
Govr Seymour was becoming profuse in his
exp
re Mr Cardwell observed to me orally that he was
reluctant to pass this Ordinance (N
o 9) to the Treasury without
some remark to that effect. I, therefore, withdraw the papers
in the hope that the Estimates, & certain explanatory enclosures
which ought to have accompanied the Gov
rs despatch & which
were promised by a succeeding Mail, would arrive. But they
have not come even now. In the interval I have discussed the
Ordinance with
Mr Buckland, the Colonial Clerk, at the Treasury;
& he is very clear in his opinion that the T-y will not take
this Ord
ce into consideration without the Estimates. He
suggests that we
shd write for them. Shall we do so at
once, or shall we make an official reference to the T-y & get
their ans
r in black & white? I consider that
Govr Seymour is
much to blame for sending the case home in an incomplete state,
after the
notice taken of a similar omission last year, & I
am not clear that our friend,
Birch, is not open to the same remark.
With respect to the question of "profusion" which by the
way, may be too strong a phrase, I can add nothing more than
what I have stated in my Minute on 8234 which I send to you with this.