I confess that on looking into this matter I
see no justification for witholding
Mr Cooper's 1/2
salary. Nakedly stated the matter stands thus.
The Government owes
Mr Cooper a certain sum
of money.
There is a question whether
Mr Cooper does or does not owe a
sum of money to a certain institution in
B. Columbia
called the Royal Columbian Hospital.
There are no means of knowing whether the Hospital
is right or
Mr Cooper is right as a matter of account,
nor does the Royal Hospital ask us to interfere. Nor is
it alleged
Mr Cooper will be unable to pay any sum due from him,
if it is due.
But a year & a half ago the
Govr wrote to us
recommending that
Mr Cooper's salary
shd be
witheld—not till the matter was settled but till he
had been called on for an explanation. The explanation
(
wh perhaps he was not very distinctly called upon to
explain) was furnished—& of course we are quite unable
to guess how much it was worth. It was sent to the
Colony more than a year ago
(
July 1865). The Colonial
Govt have
taken no further notice of this matter (it being in fact no affair of
theirs or ours but the affair of the Governors of the Hospital
who, if anybody,
shd have applied to us to stop
Mr Cooper's salary) and
Mr Cooper remains accordingly without money.
It is very probable that
Mr Cooper has misbehaved &
quite true (as
Mr Jadis says) that
Mr Cooper's
statements do not relieve him from responsibility.
But that responsibility is not to us but to the
Institution—from whom we have received no request
to interfere, & who could not with any reason request
that we
shd refuse payment of our debts for a year
& a half while they are carrying on their legal proceedings.
I
shd be therefore for paying
Mr Cooper at once.