I have had the honor to receive Your Lordship's Circular
               despatches of the 
26th and 
30th of January, on the
               subject of the proclamation of Martial Law.  The latter
despatch
               despatch states that you are not aware whether any law
               authorizing the proclamation of Martial Law by the Governor
               exists in this Colony.
               
               2.  There is no law authorizing any such proclamation
               here, but I shall not shrink from accepting the grave
               responsibility of proclaiming Martial Law should imperative
               circumstances require it.
               
            
            
               3.  I may mention that
in
 in 
May 1864, when the massacre by
               the Chilicoten Indians of a Road party at 
Bute Inlet was
               followed by the extermination of the whites from the sea to
               the 
Upper Fraser I did not think it necessary to proclaim Martial
               Law.  Two strong and efficient bands of Volunteers were started
               from 
Cariboo and 
New Westminster respectively but every man
               was sworn in as a special Constable
and
 and the Chiefs, two
               experienced Magistrates, were appointed Commissioners of Oyer
               and Terminer in order that a legal trial might be afforded to
               any prisoners taken.  As an additional precaution I accompanied
               the 
New Westminster party myself.  Though a valuable life was
               lost in skirmishing with the natives, and several wounds received
               the prisoners when driven to
               surrender were
tried
 tried by the Chief Judge of the Colony and a Jury.  None
               but the Chiefs were executed.  Six were hung at 
Quesnelmouth, and one at
               
New Westminster.  A total immunity from Indian disturbances since then
               has been the consequences of our proceedings.