No. 75
               
            
            
               
               
                     Victoria
                     
                  
               1st July 1867
               
               My Lord Duke,
                
            
            
               I have the honor to forward a letter addressed to Your
               Grace by 
Mr James Cooper, Harbour Master of this Colony,
               recapitulating the circumstances under which
he
 he accepted his
               present office from the Secretary of State; Reporting that
               his emoluments are insufficient for his maintainance in a
               state of respectability, and requesting that he might be
               transferred to some other Colony.
               
               2.  The particulars of 
Mr Cooper's appointment to
               Office are probably well known to Your Grace's Department.
               I believe his statements on the subject to be correct.
               
               
               

                     
                     What means can 
Mr Seymour possess of having any knowledge on the
                     subject?  Evidently none.
                     
               
               It therefore
only
 only remains for me to testify that 
Mr Cooper
               has been a very useful Public Officer since the Union of the
               Colonies has increased his labours, which, through no fault
               of his, were formerly very light.  He was, however, always
               ready and willing to undertake any duties which might be
               required of him.
               
               3.  I regret to say that the financial condition of the
               Colony does not allow
of
 of my holding out to 
Mr Cooper any
               hope of my being able to increase his emoluments.  Indeed I
               fear that considerable reductions will have to be made
               next year in all the Departments of the Government if the
               condition of the Colony does not improve.
               
               I have the honor to be,
               My Lord Duke,
               Your most obedient
               humble Servant
               
Frederick Seymour
               
               Minutes by CO staff
               
               
               
                
                  
                  
                     It is very natural that 
Mr Cooper or anybody else should
                     wish to get promoted.  But it cannot be said

 that he has any
                     special claim to promotion on account of services rendered by
                     him, for he happens to have had very little to do.  As to his
                     claim founded on an alleged promise to him that his present
                     Office should be equal in value to another one which he had
                     lost, not a trace appears of any promise to that effect (of
                     which the improbability need hardly be mentioned)  
in writing,
                     and there would be no lack of claims on the public
                     if they could be supported by alleged impressions derived from
                     
conversations 9 years old.
                     
 
                  
                  
                     In acknowledging the despatch call the Gov
rs attention to the
                     points noted in 
Mr Elliot's Minute which I have marked.
                     
 
            
            
               Documents enclosed with the main document (not transcribed)
               
                
                  
                  
                     James Cooper, Harbour Master, to 
Buckingham, 
1 July 1867,
                     requesting transfer to another colony, with explanation of his
                     situation and claims upon the colonial office.
                     
 
                  
                  Minutes by CO staff
                  
                   
                     
                     
                        This is a convenient, but a vague phrase.  If given to
                        understand in a letter, why does he not specify it?  If he
                        means given to understand in conversation, what is a
                        statement of that kind worth from the interested party 9 years
                        after after the date?
                        
                     
                     
                     
                      
                
            
            
               Other documents included in the file