Answer to the above effect, viz that the Hudson B.C. before
V.C.I.
was resumed by the Crown had come or was considered to have come
under an obligation to grant certain lands to the Church of
E.—and that the Crown permitted or directed the Comp
y to
fulfil their obligation just as it
wd have permitted or directed
the Company to fulfil any other obligation, binding on its
lands, to any other person or body of persons—that if no such
obligation had existed in favour of the Ch. of E, the Crown
would not have sanctioned such a grant of land to the Ch of E,
and as no such obligation exists in favour of the Ch of Scotland
HG does not consider
the Crown at liberty to direct such a grant
to be made to the Church of Scotland.