Wylly to Granville
To The Right Honorable
Earl Granville K.G.
Her Majesty's Principal Secretary
of State for the Colonies
&c &c &c
That Your Memorialist, at the date of the Union of the Colonies,
was Assessor of
Vancouver Island, having held that office since
January, 1863.
The Assessorship, under the
provisions provisions of the "Real Estate Tax
Amendment Act,
1862," of the Colony of
Vancouver Island, was
declared
permanent; the Governor, for the time being, of the Colony, being
required to appoint a
"
permanent Assessor."
The necessity for the office, (to which was attached a Salary of
£500 Sterling per annum,) having ceased, through the union of
British Columbia and
Vancouver Island, the repeal of the Act
under which the Assessorship was created, took place.
Following such repeal by the "Real Estate Tax Repeal Ordinance,
1867" and on notification of the abolition
of of the office, Your
Memorialist preferred a claim for compensation.
This claim was objected to, on the ground that the appointment
was merely a local one, not of Crown creation, and "permanent"
only So long "as the local Act under which it was created, was
in existence."
In reply to this objection, and further in behalf of the claim,
as urged in the correspondence with the Government of
British
Columbia, Your Memorialist would respectfully Submit That,
inasmuch as by the
Vancouver Island Act of
1862, the office was
declared
permanent, So, the holder thereof, at once became
invested invested with
certain rights, and So had a
permanent interest in the emoluments of the office, and that its
abolition, not brought about by any action of the Assessor, but
Simply by reason of the necessities of the State, could not
divest that officer of his interest therein; moreover, that
although the office might be abolished by the Legislature, yet,
that the emoluments attached thereto, and vested in the
Assessor, could not be confiscated, except by express terms, the
absence of which, in the Ordinance repealing the Act of
1862,
must, therefore, be held to be restrictive of the power
conferred
by by that Ordinance.
This, indeed, is the more plain, when it is Seen, that the
Ordinance of 1867, while repealing the "Real Estate Tax
Amendment Act, 1862," actually, by its provisions, Saved
existing rights, So far as the Government had acquired a right
under that Act, and consequently, it must follow, that the
rights of the Assessor, as acquired under that Act, must, in
like manner, be considered, Saved.
Your Memorialist therefore prays that relief may be afforded
him, and that the justice of the claim, as advanced, may be
admitted
admitted; its merits, and its merits alone, constituting
its best title to consideration.
But Your Memorialist
as in duty bound, will ever pray &c
Minutes by CO staff
Sir F. Sandford
Mr Wylly might well look to his app
t as being permanent,
subject to its being abolished, which it was by the same power
that created it. He only held it from
1863 to 1867—his
compensation would only have been four months Salary (£500 a
year)—but you
will see from his letter of the
13 May to the Col.
Secy that
he refused some employment
which might debar him from any claim
to compensation.
Whatever claim he has is agst the Colony.
Simply decline to interfere with the decision of the Local
Government.
Documents enclosed with the main document (not transcribed)
A.N. Birch to
Wylly,
1 May 1867, advising that the
position of assessor had been abolished.
Wylly to Colonial Secretary,
13 May 1867, submitting a claim for
compensation.
Birch to
Wylly,
10 June 1867, advising his claim could not be
considered as the position of assessor was not a permanent one.
One months salary was offered as compensation for loss of office.
Wylly to Colonial Secretary,
20 June 1867, disputing the view
that his position was not permanent and requesting a further
review of his case.
Birch to
Wylly,
4 July 1867, reporting that as his was not a
Crown appointment, it was permanent only "so long as the local
Act under which it was created was in existence."
Wylly to Colonial Secretary,
28 July 1867, further explanation
of why his claim should be allowed to stand (11 pages).
W.A.G. Young to
Wylly,
25 November 1867, advising that after
further review, his claim for compensation was again disallowed.
Wylly to Colonial Secretary,
12 March 1869, asking for a
reconsideration of his case in light of a despatch from
Buckingham to
Seymour,
24 October 1868, regarding compensation.
Young to
Wylly,
24 March 1869, advising that the despatch in
question referred only to compensation for losses caused by
"the removal of the Seat of Government from
New Westminster to
Victoria."
Other documents included in the file
Minutes by CO staff
The papers have never gone on for signature.
People in this document
Birch, Arthur Nonus
Blake, Ernest Edward
Cox, Charles
Grenville, Richard
Leveson-Gower, Granville George
Monsell, William
Musgrave, Sir Anthony
Rogers, Baron Blachford Frederic
Sandford, Francis Richard
Seymour, Governor Frederick
Wylly, Charles G.
Young, William Alexander George
Places in this document
British Columbia
New Westminster
San Francisco
Vancouver Island
Victoria