The letter of the
12 Jan last to the Treasury (c/14206-69)
explains exactly
the state of the case on this latter point—& it has now to be
decided whether
Mr Seymour's Representatives
(His Widow I believe) shall be called upon to refund the
£2561.2.2. he
received on account of additional Salary at the
rate of £1000 [per] year. That decision was postponed—with
Treasury concurrence see Treas
y/771-70—until this further
information should be
recd. I would refer you to
Sir F.
Rogers' minute on 4/11115-69.
Mr Musgrave was also requested to state up to what period the
Accounts of the Crown Fund had been sent home for Audit. The
answer is not since the Union—but why or
wherefore is not stated.
Mr Musgrave further suggests that the Crown Fund should be paid
into the General Revenue, & thus become subject to the control
of the Legislative Council.
Up to the Union of
Vancouver Isd &
B. Columbia various
Vancouver Isd Salaries &c were paid out of the Crown Fund of the
former. At the Union the Salaries of the Public Officers were
paid from the General Revenue
of the United Colony under the
Crown Officers Salaries Act
B. Columbia N
o 12 of
1863—that is
to say the Salaries thus given to the Officers of
B. Columbia
before Union were continued as
the Salaries of the Officers of the United Colony—with an
additional £1000 to the
Govr under a subsequent permanent Act.
The last account of the Receipts & Expenditures of this Fund that
can be found is that for
1864—it is as
follows—
Due by the Colony—
1 Jan 1864 $34,321.65
Receipts
Land Sales 15,528.45
Land Revenue 565.—
Rent—Mining 1,140.—
Mining Revenue
21,263.65
55,585.30
Expenditure
Salary of
Sir J. Douglas, late Gov 13,611.27
"
Gov. Kennedy 11,323.18
" Colonial
Secy 1,529.45
" Gold Comm
rs 1,608.26
Court House—
Leech River 791.62
Preemption Fees to Land Recorders 151.32
Refunds
19.50
$
29,034.60
Due by the Colony on
31 Dec. 1864 26,550.70
I find that in
1866 or 7 Fines Fees & Forfeitures were
brought back
to the Crown Fund—as done previous to
1864—coming to about
$1000 a year. I do not clearly make out what is meant by "due
the Colony," $26,550,
I find this was money lent to the Colony & not repaid.
because by a Return laid before the
Legislature
Feb 1865 of receipt & payments the intimated balance
in favor of the former is put at $84.066.
The real balance on paper.
As regards the surrender of this Fund to the control of the
Legislature I conclude there is no bar to it because in a
dispatch dated the
15 June 1863 the
D. of Newcastle stated that
on the passing of an Act to secure the principal Officers
permanent Salaries
he was prepared to hold the Crown Revenue
of
Vancouver Island at the disposal of the Legislature,
retaining only such temporary power over the Land as will enable
HM's
Govt to close its transactions with the Hudson's Bay
Cy. When this is effected
I shall be ready to transfer
the management of the Revenue to the Colonial Legislature.
The H. of Assembly
declined to pass a Civil List Act—upon learning which
Mr
Cardwell (
30 Ap 1864) wrote
It appears from the Resolution of the Assembly that
the Crown Land Fund for the
year
1863 amounted to £4,500 (1863—$27,898
from the Return in all), but that a considerable portion of this
sum consisted of the proceeds of sales effected in former years.
There may be sources of Revenue such as Fines & Forfeitures,
Fees
of Office, the proceeds of which the Crown could justly
appropriate, but in the absence of any precise information on
this head
I can only authorize you to issue Warrants for the payment of
the Salaries of the Governor & Col:
Secy at the respective
rates of £3000 & £600 per an assigned to them by my
Predecessor, out of any Funds that may be under the direct
control & at the disposal of the Crown.
And here the matter rested apparently lost sight of
in the
exciting & important question of the Union of the two Colonies.
As to the surrender of this Crown Fund to the control of the
Legislature I may say, tho perhaps beyond my province, that
having a sufficient List I do not see any fair reason for
retaining the money at the disposal of the Governor—& that this
surrender might
[be] coupled with the single
condition, as suggested by
Sir F. Rogers if I may refer to a
casual conversation, that they shall place permanently at the
disposal of the Governor a sum of say £1000 as a general
contingent Fund, an account of the Expenditure being laid before
the Legislature at the beginning of each ensuing year for
their information.
It remains to be considered what instructions
shd be
given for
the audit of passed Accounts, & for how far back,
Yes, since the Union.
& I think there [should]
be sent home an account of the receipts & payments since
1864
to the present time.
Send copy to the Treasury saying that
Lord Granville will now be
glad to have their decision upon the question raised in the
letter from this office of the
12th Jan;
Is it necessary to ask for an answer. I believe the widow is in very
bad circumstances.
& is of opinion that, as a sufficient
Civil List has been permanently provided, the Crown Fund may now
be merged in the General Revenue, & placed under the control of
the Legislature, on condition of their passing a supplementary
Civil List securing £1000 per ann., to be accounted for by the
Governor, but expended by him alone as Imperial Interests may
require. And that Lord G. proposes to instruct the Governor to
send
send home for audit the accounts of the Crown Fund since the Union.