Museum of Practical Geology
28 April 1853
Sir,
I have to state for the information of the
Duke of Newcastle that,
while it appears very desirable that the ground mentioned should be
properly explored, some care as to the terms of the proposed lease would
appear needed.
The Royalty proposed of 5 per cent, or at the rate of One Twentieth
of the gross produce, is undoubtedly low, yet, as it seems important to
encourage the needful researches, perhaps a higher Royalty may be
dispensed with for the present. The proposed term of 60 years appears
far too long, and I would suggest for the consideration of His Grace if
from 14 to 21 years would not be an ample range of time. Various
circumstances, difficult to foresee, may render rights of this kind over
so large a portion of ground as within 5 miles radius from
Una Point,
Michell's Harbour, not desirable, particularly when we regard the
position of
the Island, and the kind of harbour (as shown on the sketch
map sent) on the Pacific side of the British North American possessions.
No doubt the right to work this area for metallic minerals may not be
accompanied by the absolute lease of the land for all purposes
for 60
years, a small portion being only thus leased, yet the right of working
for metallic minerals might seriously affect the advantages of some
future settlement in that part of
Queen Charlottes Island; and it is to
be recollected that coal, reported to be in some quantity (the specimens
sent to the Museum of Practical Geology were of fair quality, though
taken from the surface) occurs in
Vancouver's Island, on the South.
With regard to the method of obtaining the small Royalty proposed,
there will probably be difficulties, for although the ore might at first
be sent to the Colonial Gold Company, and all being honorably
transacted, the Royalty collected, this method of treating them may not
be persevered in. The alternative of paying according to the number of
men employed monthly would scarcely meet the case unless the returns
from a given number of men could be considered
as constants. Probably
the method of collecting the Royalty may be made [a] matter of further
discussion and adjustment. In all cases it would appear desirable that,
if the works were discontinued for some given time, say any twelve
consecutive months, the lease should terminate.
I have the honor to be Sir
Your very obedient Servant
H.T. De la Becke
Minutes by CO staff
Mr Merivale
If the
Duke of Newcastle is prepared to sanction a lease of ground in
Queen Charlotte's Island to this proposed Company—and if it is certain
that such lease will not interfere with the trading privileges of the
Hudson's Bay Company I presume that the next step will be to refer the
correspondence to the Treasury and enquire whether the
proposed Royalty
of five per cent meets the views of the Treasury, and how they
wd
wish that or any other amount of Royalty should be collected. If the
project should be persevered in the report of the Land Board
wd be
requisite. Perhaps you may be of opinion that that
Dt should be
consulted
before the Treasury.
According to ordinary practice the Land Board should report, unless
the
D. of Newcastle thinks proper to dispense with this delay & direct
them to prepare a lease embodying Sir H de la Beckes' stipulations. The
draft lease might be submitted to the Treasury. I think this would be
better than consulting them beforehand. I believe myself that in the
case of so small a portion of land, & so unfrequented a region, a lease
of the soil would be better than a mere right to work the minerals,
which would lead to collisions with the purchasers of the soil if there
were any.
M
r Taylor's high character is a strong guarantee for the
respectability of this Company, yet I think (with so many stock-jobbing
schemes afloat) it will be right to make some enquiry as to the means
and respectability of the Promoters.
M
r J. Taylor &
Mr Esterby [Easterby] called on me to day & will
send in a statement of the names means & respectability of the persons
by whom M
r Esterby will be supported. He does not however propose to
establish a Co. but an association with himself [and] a few persons of
means & respectability.
We should also ascertain
that a lease would not be at variance with
the privileges of the Hudsons Bay Company,
Mr Merivale has already given his attention to this point and is of
opinion that the lease
wd not interfere with the rights of the H.B.
Company; but the question can be proposed distinctly to the Land Board
when reference of the papers is made to them.
tho' on this point I do not entertain much doubt.
These questions being satisfactorily answered, the Land Board may
be directed to prepare a draft lease (I should think 14 years
sufficient) which may then be submitted to the Treasury for their
opinion on the whole matter.