This is a case in which we have some cause to complain of
inattention to a very plain duty, although we cannot at this
distance tell who is in fault. The grant of the land of
Vanc. I. to the HBCo. expressly provides that "the Company shall
reserve for the use of us our heirs &c all such land as may be
required for the formation of naval establishments, we paying a
reasonable price for the same."
Thetis Island according to this
report was so "required" and ought to have been so purchased.
But I suppose the naval officers on the station preferred using
it without paying for it & trusting to the chapter of accidents.
Now they complain that the land has been sold: but on what
possible ground? I do not suppose the Surveyor could refuse to
sell land claimed by nobody.
Gov. Douglas's suggestion that the
Adm
y had better trust to "possession" is very public
spirited, but I am not sure what
Mr Nagle the purchaser might
say to it. Point out this to the Adm
y? & ask the
Govr for a
report. Also communicate to the HBC, but I do not see how they
can help us.