Montreal
4th April 1859
Sir,
I have the honor to submit for your perusal, the following extract
from a letter just received by me, from my son
Mr John Barnston, a
Canadian barrister who left Montreal last Autumn, to reside in
Vancouver's Island.
My professional position here is not an agreeable one; English
barristers and Scotch advocates are the only persons entitled to
practice in the Superior Court, and others are only admitted in
sufferance at present as agents for the parties—not as attornies or
barristers. There is only one English barrister here at present; but
there is no doubt that in a short time there will be more, when,
unless the order in Council be repealed, Colonial barristers will not
be allowed to appear. The same rule is observed at present in
British Columbia.
I
I most respectfully beg leave to bring under your notice the extreme
hardship of the case above disclosed, and to solicit such action on
the part of Her Majesty's government, as the nature of the case seems
to require.
I have the honor to be Sir
Your most obedient Servant
Geo. Barnston
To the Right Hon
E.B. Lytton
&c &c &c
Her Majesty's principal Secretary of State for the Colonies
Minutes by CO staff
Lord Carnarvon
Instruct the Governor of C[anada] to inform the writer in answer that
copy of his Letter has been referred to the Governor of
Van Couver's
Island &
B. Columbia with a request that the application (which seems
a reasonable one) may be taken into favorable consideration.
2. Write to
Governor Douglas accordingly & refer him to the
correspondence which has already passed in reference to the admission
of Scotch Solicitors to practice in the Superior Court of
V. Couver's
Island.
Leaving the matter however to his discretion: as it may have a
connection with the rather delicate question of the admission of U.S.
lawyers.
Documents enclosed with the main document (not transcribed)
Barnston to
Lytton,
4 April 1859, advising where mail could be
sent to him.
Other documents included in the file
Draft,
Lytton to
Douglas, No. 57,
29 April 1859, admitting that he is "unwilling to interfere" with
Douglas's "discretion" concerning who can practice law in the superior courts.