<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-model href="../schemas/coldesp.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="../schemas/coldesp.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:id="B58063"><!-- KSS edit 10-04-08: added PB tags only; requires further proofing -->

<teiHeader>
<fileDesc><titleStmt><title><persName ref="prs:douglas_j"><surname>Douglas</surname>,     <forename>James</forename></persName> to <persName ref="prs:lytton_egeb"><surname>Lytton</surname>,  <forename>Edward</forename> <forename>George</forename> <forename>Earle</forename> <forename>Bulwer</forename></persName> 30 December 1858, CO 60:1, no. 2142, 561.</title>
<author><persName ref="prs:douglas_j">Douglas</persName></author>
<respStmt><resp>addressee</resp>
<persName ref="prs:lytton_egeb">Lytton</persName>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><p>Published by Jim Hendrickson and the University of Victoria.</p>
</publicationStmt><notesStmt><note xml:id="B58063_citation"><bibl><persName ref="prs:douglas_j"><surname>Douglas</surname>,     <forename>James</forename></persName> to <persName ref="prs:lytton_egeb"><surname>Lytton</surname>,  <forename>Edward</forename> <forename>George</forename> <forename>Earle</forename> <forename>Bulwer</forename></persName> 30 December 1858, CO 60:1, no. 2142, 561.<title level="m">The Colonial Despatches of Vancouver Island and British Columbia 1846-1871</title>, Edition 2.6, ed. James Hendrickson and the Colonial Despatches project. Victoria, B.C.: University of Victoria. <ref target="B58063.html">https://bcgenesis.uvic.ca/B58063.html</ref>.
                    </bibl></note></notesStmt>
<sourceDesc><bibl><idno type="archivalId">CO 60:01</idno>
<idno type="repository">CO</idno>
<idno type="coNumber">60</idno>
<idno type="coVol">1</idno>
<idno type="coRegistration">2142</idno>
<idno type="page">561</idno>
<idno type="despatchNo">63</idno>
<series>B.C.</series>
<date when="1858-12-30" type="sent">1858</date>
<date type="received" when="1859-02-28">received 28 February 1859</date>
<biblScope type="startPageImage" facs="co_60_01/co_60_01_00561r.jpg">co_60_01_00561r.jpg</biblScope>
<note>Transcribed from microfilm archives, marked up in Waterloo Script, then transformed into TEI P5 XML.</note>
</bibl>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>

<encodingDesc>
<styleDefDecl scheme="css"/>
<listPrefixDef xml:id="incPrefixDefs">
        
        <prefixDef ident="trm" matchPattern="(.+)" replacementPattern="https://bcgenesis.uvic.ca/glossary.htm#trm_$1">
          <p>The project glossary items have <att>xml:id</att> attributes beginning
          with <code>trm_</code>, and we use a <code>trm:</code> prefix to refer to
          them when linking from <gi>term</gi> elements.</p>
        </prefixDef>

        <prefixDef ident="org" matchPattern="(.+)" replacementPattern="https://bcgenesis.uvic.ca/$1.html">
          <p>We link to orgs in <code>orgs/organizations.xml</code> using the <code>org:</code> prefix.</p>
        </prefixDef>
        
        <prefixDef ident="plc" matchPattern="(.+)" replacementPattern="https://bcgenesis.uvic.ca/$1.html">
          <p>We link to places in <code>places.xml</code> using the <code>plc:</code> prefix.</p>
        </prefixDef>
        
        <prefixDef ident="prs" matchPattern="(.+)" replacementPattern="https://bcgenesis.uvic.ca/$1.html">
          <p>We link to people in <code>bios/*.xml</code> using the <code>prs:</code> prefix.</p>
        </prefixDef>
        
        <prefixDef ident="vsl" matchPattern="(.+)" replacementPattern="https://bcgenesis.uvic.ca/$1.html">
          <p>We link to vessels in <code>vessels/*.xml</code> using the <code>vsl:</code> prefix.</p>
        </prefixDef>
        
        <prefixDef ident="cdc" matchPattern="(.+)" replacementPattern="https://bcgenesis.uvic.ca/$1.html">
          <p>We link to other documents in the collection using the <code>cdc:</code> prefix.</p>
        </prefixDef>
        
        <prefixDef ident="cdt" matchPattern="(.*)" replacementPattern="http://bcgenesis.uvic.ca/document_types.xml#$1">
          <p>The cdt (ColDesp Document Type) prefix used on <gi>catRef</gi>/<att>target</att> points
            to a central taxonomy in the includes file.</p>
        </prefixDef>
        
        <prefixDef ident="img" matchPattern="(.+)" replacementPattern="https://bcgenesis.uvic.ca/imageBrowser.html?img=$1">
          <p>We link to other documents in the collection using the <code>cdc:</code> prefix.</p>
        </prefixDef>
        
      </listPrefixDef></encodingDesc>
<profileDesc><abstract><p>Despatch to London. 
                Minutes (6), Enclosures (untranscribed) (1), Other documents (1).</p>

<p><persName ref="prs:douglas_j">Douglas</persName> informs <persName ref="prs:lytton_egeb">Lytton</persName> that he instituted his gold regulations to <q>accustom [foreign miners] to the restraints of lawful authority</q> and to eliminate any of their <q>own attempts at legislation.</q> He reports that <q>no serious objection</q> has been issued by the population. </p>

<p>The minutes observe <q>how easy it is to theorise in England &amp; how difficult it is sometimes to give effect to those theories in a new Colony.</q> The CO concedes that <q>the Governor must know best.</q></p>

<p>Enclosed is a draft reply from <persName ref="prs:lytton_egeb">Lytton</persName> to <persName ref="prs:douglas_j">Douglas</persName> addressing <persName ref="prs:brew_c">Brew</persName>’s concerns; and Brew to <persName ref="prs:douglas_j">Douglas</persName> concerning his journey, salary and plans for a police force.</p>

</abstract><correspDesc>
<correspAction type="sent">
<persName ref="prs:douglas_j"><surname>Douglas</surname>,     <forename>James</forename></persName>
<address><addrLine>
Victoria, Vancouver's Island
</addrLine></address>
<date when="1858-12-30"/>
</correspAction>
<correspAction type="received">
<persName ref="prs:lytton_egeb"><surname>Lytton</surname>,  <forename>Edward</forename> <forename>George</forename> <forename>Earle</forename> <forename>Bulwer</forename></persName>
<date when="1859-02-28"/></correspAction></correspDesc></profileDesc>
 
<revisionDesc status="unproofed">
<change when="2019-02-04">Inserted revisionDesc with @status="unproofed".</change>
<change resp="lyallg" when="2019-03-20">Changed idno @type="received" into a date element. Gave existing date an @type="sent" and reordered bibl contents.</change>
</revisionDesc>
 
 
</teiHeader>
 
<text><body>

<!--&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;name type="cdorigin"&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt;Douglas&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;/name&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt; -->
<!--&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;name type="cdaddres"&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt;Lytton&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;/name&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt; -->
<!-- ..cm =================================================================== -->
<div type="despatch_to_london">
<head>
No. 63
</head>
<opener><ref type="co_ref">2142, CO 60/1, p. 561; received 28 February 1859</ref>
<address><addrLine>
<placeName ref="plc:victoria">Victoria</placeName>, <placeName ref="plc:vancouver_island">Vancouver's Island</placeName>
</addrLine>
</address>
<date when="1858-12-30">30 December 1858</date>
<salute>Sir,</salute>
</opener>
<p>
I have the honor to acknowledge the receipt of your Despatch,
<index><term>Regulations</term><index><term>mining</term></index></index>
<index><term>Mining</term><index><term>regulations</term></index></index>
marked Confidential, of the <date when="1858-10-14">14<hi style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 80%;">th</hi> of October</date>
last;
<note xml:id="B06301" n="B5806301"><hi rend="citation">October last;</hi> = <ref type="doc" target="cdc:B587029A">Lytton to Douglas, 14 October 1858, CO 398/1, p. 107</ref>, Conf.
</note>
in which you have been pleased to favor me with the impressions derived<fw type="catchword" style="text-align: right;">from</fw><pb facs="co_60_01/co_60_01_00561v.jpg"/>
from the perusal of the Regulations framed for the management of the
Gold Fields in <placeName ref="plc:british_columbia">British Columbia</placeName>, and it is not without reason that
I now express the deepest sense of obligation for the searching
investigation which you have given to that subject.
</p>
<p>
2. I was sensible from the outset, of the arduous nature
of the task of framing regulations so perfectly adapted for a
comparatively unknown<fw type="catchword" style="text-align: right;">country</fw><pb facs="co_60_01/co_60_01_00562r.jpg"/> country, as to be unobjectionable,
especially for a country situated as is <placeName ref="plc:british_columbia">British Columbia</placeName>, in the
close vicinity of a powerful state whose inhabitants would for
a time at least form the great bulk of the population.
</p>
<p>
3. It was to establish a legal control over the adventurers
who were rushing, from all sides, into the country, to anticipate their
own<fw type="catchword" style="text-align: right;">attempts</fw><pb facs="co_60_01/co_60_01_00562v.jpg"/> attempts at legislation and to accustom them to the restraints of
lawful authority, that I prepared and issued the gold regulations.
I am therefore not wedded to the established system, as I hardly
ventured to hope, that it would be found in all respects so well
adapted to the people and the country, as to form the permanent mining
code of <placeName ref="plc:british_columbia">British Columbia</placeName>.
</p>
<p>
4. No serious<fw type="catchword" style="text-align: right;">objection</fw><pb facs="co_60_01/co_60_01_00563r.jpg"/> objection has been offered by the miners to that
section of the Law, which regulates the size of mining claims, but
<index><term>Licenses</term><index><term>mining</term><index><term>objections to</term></index></index></index>
<index><term>Mining</term><index><term>licenses</term><index><term>objections to</term></index></index></index>
there has been, and I fear always will exist a strong dislike to the
payment of a monthly licence fee, and the enforcement of that system
might ultimately lead as it did in Australia to fatal interruptions,
of the public Peace.
</p>
<p>
5. There are several other objections to the monthly licence fee,
considered as a source of revenue, such as<fw type="catchword" style="text-align: right;">the</fw><pb facs="co_60_01/co_60_01_00563v.jpg"/> the cost of collection,
its equal pressure upon the prosperous and unsuccessful Miner, and its
frequent evasion—objections which apply with peculiar force to
the extensive and hardly accessible Gold Districts of <placeName ref="plc:british_columbia">British Columbia</placeName>.
</p>
<p>
6. I shall not fail to consider with care your suggestions, and
to revise the Law as it respects the extraction of Gold by means of
machinery from Quartz rocks and other classes of<fw type="catchword" style="text-align: right;">mining</fw><pb facs="co_60_01/co_60_01_00564r.jpg"/> mining requiring
the large investment of capital.
</p>
<p>
7. My attention was in fact closely devoted to a revision of
the Gold regulations, when your Despatch on the subject was received.
</p>
<p>
The expediency of abolishing the monthly licence Fee, in
<index><term>Licenses</term><index><term>mining</term><index><term>objections to</term></index></index></index>
consequence of its obnoxious features, and of introducing the system
which has been found to work with such happy effects in <placeName ref="plc:victoria">Victoria</placeName>,
was an idea<fw type="catchword" style="text-align: right;">naturally</fw><pb facs="co_60_01/co_60_01_00564v.jpg"/> naturally suggested by the consideration of the subject
and we should not have hesitated in adopting that system with perhaps
some modification in details, but for the difficulty of dealing with the
export duty on gold, which has proved so prolific a source of revenue
in <placeName ref="plc:victoria">Victoria</placeName> as more than to compensate for the surrender of the
monthly licence fees.
</p>
<p>
8. The imposition of a duty at present on<fw type="catchword" style="text-align: right;">the</fw><pb facs="co_60_01/co_60_01_00565r.jpg"/> the export of Gold in
<index><term>Export duty on gold</term><index><term>objections to</term></index></index>
<placeName ref="plc:british_columbia">British Columbia</placeName>, would it is feared be comparatively unproductive of
revenue, besides having the effect of diverting the course of trade,
which it has been the hitherto successful object of all our legislation
to retain within our own possessions, to
<placeName ref="plc:semiahmoo">Samiamoo</placeName>
<note xml:id="B06302" n="B5806302"> <hi rend="citation">1, <placeName ref="plc:semiahmoo">Samiamoo</placeName></hi> = wrong reference??
<placeName ref="plc:semiahmoo">Samiamoo (Semiahmoo)</placeName> was located on Semiahmoo Bay, just south of the
49th parallel. <title level="j">Gazette</title>, 13 August 1858.
</note>
and other American frontier Towns. The miners returning with their gains
to California,<fw type="catchword" style="text-align: right;">would</fw><pb facs="co_60_01/co_60_01_00565v.jpg"/> would naturally seek to evade the payment of the duty,
cross over the frontier, and take the road to those places; instead of
coming direct to <placeName ref="plc:victoria">Victoria</placeName> which is now enriched by their visits.
</p>
<p>
9. We have as yet found no solution of this difficulty, but I am
of opinion that it will nevertheless be advisable at once to abolish
the monthly licence fees, and to replace them by an annual<fw type="catchword" style="text-align: right;">payment</fw><pb facs="co_60_01/co_60_01_00566r.jpg"/>
payment—probably exceeding the payment annually levied on miners in
the Colony of
<placeName ref="plc:victoria_au">Victoria</placeName>.
<note xml:id="B06303" n="B5806303"> <hi rend="citation">9, of Victoria.</hi> = abolish monthly licenses
The initial license fee in <placeName ref="plc:victoria_au">Victoria</placeName>, Australia, was £1 per month, which
was replaced, first, by an annual fee of £1, plus a £10 per acre on
alluvial soil, and third by an export tax of 2 shillings 6 pence per
ounce of gold. See <ref type="doc" target="cdc:B587029A">Lytton to Douglas, 14 October 1858, CO 398/1, p. 107</ref>.
</note>
</p>
<p>
10. It may also be advisable to adopt the other features of the
Victorian system—a subject which will have my early and anxious
<index><term>Executive Council</term></index>
consideration, with the aid and advice of my executive Council, which
will be composed of <persName ref="prs:moody_rc">Lieutenant Governor Moody</persName> and the other officers who
<index><term>Moody, Col. Richard C.</term></index>
have lately arrived from<fw type="catchword" style="text-align: right;">England</fw><pb facs="co_60_01/co_60_01_00566v.jpg"/>
England
<note xml:id="B06304" n="B5806304"> <hi rend="citation">10, arrived from England</hi> = Executive Council
An Executive Council was not formally authorized until 1863.
<persName ref="prs:douglas_j">Douglas</persName> began shortly to meet with <persName ref="prs:moody_rc">Moody</persName> and <persName ref="prs:begbie_mb">Begbie</persName>, encouraged to do
so, no doubt, by <persName ref="prs:lytton_egeb">Lytton</persName>'s suggestion that he form such a "council of
advice" to assist him in his duties. (<ref type="doc" target="cdc:V587206">Lytton to Douglas, 31 July 1858, CO 410/1, p. 147</ref>.)
He provisionally appointed <persName ref="prs:moody_rc">Moody</persName> and <persName ref="prs:begbie_mb">Begbie</persName> to the "Council" of
<placeName ref="plc:british_columbia">British Columbia</placeName> on <date when="1859-03-01">1 March 1859</date>, but it is unlikely that this body ever
formally met. For further information, see James E. Hendrickson,
<title level="a">Introduction,</title> <title level="m">Journals of the Colonial Legislatures of the
Colonies of Vancouver Island and British Columbia, 1851-1871</title>,
5 vols. (Victoria: Provincial Archives of British Columbia, 1980), pp.
xl-xli.
</note>
</p>
<p>
11. It will be our study to frame such regulations as will give
satisfaction to the people at large, and to create a public revenue, with
the smallest possible amount of pressure on the trade and resources of
the Country.
</p>
<closer>
I have etc.
<lb/>
<persName ref="prs:douglas_j">James Douglas</persName>
<lb/>
Governor
<lb/>
</closer>
<!-- ..cm =================================================================== -->
</div>
<div type="minutes">
<div type="minute_entry"><pb facs="co_60_01/co_60_01_00566v.jpg"/>
<ab><persName ref="prs:merivale_h">M<hi style="text-decoration: underline; vertical-align: super; font-size: 80%;">r</hi> Merivale</persName><lb/>
<persName ref="prs:carnarvon">Lord Carnarvon</persName> has given much of his attention to this subject.
See the draft which he wrote on the <date when="1858-10-14">14 Oct.</date>
<note xml:id="B06307" n="B5806307"> <hi rend="citation">minutes, wrote on the 14 Oct.</hi> = <persName ref="prs:carnarvon">Carnarvon</persName> draft; see footnote in <ref type="doc" target="cdc:V58037#V03703">Douglas to Lytton, 30 August 1858, 10344, CO 60/1, p. 134</ref>, Conf.</note>
</ab>

<closer><signed><persName ref="prs:blackwood_aj">AB<hi style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 80%;">d</hi></persName>
<date when="1859-02-28">
28 Feb<hi style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 80%;">y</hi>
</date>
</signed>
</closer>
</div>
<div type="minute_entry">
<ab><persName ref="prs:carnarvon">Lord Carnarvon</persName><lb/>
I am afraid the subject presents only a choice of difficulties.
<index><term>Export duty</term><index><term> difficulty of enforcement</term></index></index>
I should have hoped that<pb facs="co_60_01/co_60_01_00567r.jpg"/> the export duty would have been
comparatively easy of collection, owing to the very difficult
character of the exits &amp; entrances of the Colony except at
<placeName ref="plc:langley">Fort Langley</placeName>. But the Governor must know best.
</ab>
<closer><signed><persName ref="prs:merivale_h">HM</persName>
<date when="1859-03-02">
M<hi style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 80%;">h</hi> 2
</date>
</signed>
</closer>
</div>
<div type="minute_entry">
<ab>
This desp. shows how easy it is to theorise in England &amp; how
difficult it is sometimes to give effect to those theories
in a new Colony. I hardly understand how the <choice><abbr>Gov<hi style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 80%;">r</hi></abbr><expan>Governor</expan></choice> can make
a yearly license fee a sufficient substitute for the monthly
one, <choice><abbr>w<hi style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 80%;">h</hi></abbr><expan>which</expan></choice> he admits to be generally objectionable; but
I do not think that we are in a position to give instructions
or even definite advice on the subject. The export duty
may under present circumstances be useless or mischievous
but whenever a bank is established at <placeName ref="plc:victoria">Victoria</placeName>, a certain
revenue might, I s<hi style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 80%;">d</hi> think, be obtained by undertaking
the<pb facs="co_60_01/co_60_01_00567v.jpg"/> conveyance &amp; the escort of the gold to the Coast; and
then perhaps some moderate export duty <choice><abbr>w<hi style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 80%;">d</hi></abbr><expan>would</expan></choice> be practicable.
</ab>
<closer><signed><persName ref="prs:carnarvon">C</persName>
<date when="1859-03-03">
M<hi style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 80%;">h</hi> 3
</date>
</signed>
</closer>
</div>
<div type="minute_entry">
<ab>
I see no reason to alter my former opinions &amp; believe the
Export Duty will prove lucrative. Print for Parl<hi style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 80%;">t</hi>.
</ab>
<closer><signed><persName ref="prs:lytton_egeb">EBL</persName>
<date when="1859-03-04">
M 4
</date>
</signed>
</closer>
<!-- ..cm =================================================================== -->
</div>
</div>

<div type="other_files">
<div type="other_entry"><pb facs="co_60_01/co_60_01_00568r.jpg"/>
<ab>
Draft reply, <persName ref="prs:lytton_egeb">Lytton</persName> to <persName ref="prs:douglas_j">Douglas</persName>, No. 9, <date when="1859-01-28">28 January 1859</date>.
</ab>
</div>
</div>

<div type="enclosure_list">
<div type="enclosure_entry"><pb facs="co_60_01/co_60_01_00570r.jpg"/>
<ab><persName ref="prs:brew_c">C. Brew</persName>, Chief Inspector of Police, to <persName ref="prs:douglas_j">Douglas</persName>, 11
<index><term>Police force</term><index><term>plans for</term></index></index>
<index><term>Brew, Chartres</term><index><term>plans for police force</term></index></index>
November 1858, concerning journey, salary and plans for police force.
<!-- .cm .mie [Minutes on above:] -->
</ab>
</div>

<div type="minutes">
<div type="minute_entry"><pb facs="co_60_01/co_60_01_00572r.jpg"/>
<ab>
This copy of <persName ref="prs:brew_c">M<hi style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 80%;">r</hi> Brew</persName>'s letter has been enclosed—owing
to the pressure of time—in a private letter from <persName ref="prs:douglas_j"><choice><abbr>Gov<hi style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 80%;">r</hi></abbr><expan>Governor</expan></choice> Douglas</persName>.
<note xml:id="B06305" n="B5806305"> <hi rend="citation">enclosure, private letter from Governor <persName ref="prs:douglas_j">Douglas</persName>.</hi> = to CO
Only <persName ref="prs:brew_c">Brew</persName>'s enclosure was apparently registered, not <persName ref="prs:douglas_j">Douglas</persName>'s letter.
FIND ??
</note>
It can now be registered &amp; minuted.
</ab>
<closer><signed><persName ref="prs:carnarvon">C</persName>
<date when="1859-01-15">
Jany 15
</date>
</signed>
</closer>
</div>
 
<div type="minute_entry">
<ab><persName ref="prs:merivale_h">M<hi style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 80%;">r</hi> Merivale</persName><lb/>
The request of <persName ref="prs:brew_c">M<hi style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 80%;">r</hi> Brew</persName> to be relieved from the payment
of a portion of the amount advanced to him has been so far
anticipated that by a Despatch dated the 11
Nov<hi style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 80%;">r</hi>
<note xml:id="B06306" n="B5806306"> <hi rend="citation">minutes, dated the 11 Novr</hi> = £100 compensation for <persName ref="prs:brew_c">Brew</persName>. See <ref type="doc" target="cdc:B587038">Lytton to Douglas, 11 November 1858, CO 398/1, p. 143</ref>.
</note>
<persName ref="prs:douglas_j"><choice><abbr>Gov<hi style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 80%;">r</hi></abbr><expan>Governor</expan></choice> Douglas</persName> was informed that the £100 advanced by the <placeName ref="plc:novascotia">Nova Scotia</placeName> <choice><abbr>Gov<hi style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 80%;">t</hi></abbr><expan>Government</expan></choice> could be repaid by this Country. He likewise
received an advance of £150 before his departure on account of salary.
</ab>
<closer><signed><persName ref="prs:jadis_v">VJ</persName>
<date when="1859-01-17">
17 Jan
</date>
</signed>
<signed><persName ref="prs:merivale_h">HM</persName>
<date when="1859-01-17">
Jan 17
</date>
</signed>
</closer>
</div>
</div>

</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>