<persName ref="prs:robinson_gf"><surname>Robinson</surname>, <forename>George</forename> <forename>Frederick</forename> <forename>Samuel</forename> <forename>(Earl de Grey)</forename></persName> to <persName ref="prs:elliot_tf"><surname>Elliot</surname>, <forename>Thomas</forename> <forename>Frederick</forename></persName> 16 January 1863, CO 60:17, no. 546, 335. Ripon addressee Elliot (Assistant Under-Secretary)

Published by Jim Hendrickson and the University of Victoria.

Robinson, George Frederick Samuel (Earl de Grey) to Elliot, Thomas Frederick 16 January 1863, CO 60:17, no. 546, 335.The Colonial Despatches of Vancouver Island and British Columbia 1846-1871, Edition 2.6, ed. James Hendrickson and the Colonial Despatches project. Victoria, B.C.: University of Victoria. https://bcgenesis.uvic.ca/B635WA01.html. CO 60:17 CO 60 17 546 335 B.C. 1863 received 16 January co_60_17_00332r.jpg Transcribed from microfilm archives, marked up in Waterloo Script, then transformed into TEI P5 XML.

The project glossary items have xml:id attributes beginning with trm_, and we use a trm: prefix to refer to them when linking from term elements.

We link to orgs in orgs/organizations.xml using the org: prefix.

We link to places in places.xml using the plc: prefix.

We link to people in bios/*.xml using the prs: prefix.

We link to vessels in vessels/*.xml using the vsl: prefix.

We link to other documents in the collection using the cdc: prefix.

The cdt (ColDesp Document Type) prefix used on catRef/target points to a central taxonomy in the includes file.

We link to other documents in the collection using the cdc: prefix.

Public Offices document. Minutes (5), Enclosures (transcribed) (3), Other documents (1).

 Robinson, George Frederick Samuel (Earl de Grey)
War Office Downing Street Downing Street
Elliot, Thomas Frederick Inserted revisionDesc.
Ripon to Elliot (Assistant Under-Secretary) 546, CO 60/17, p. 335; received 16 January
War Office
16 January 1863

I am directed by the Secretary of State for War to request that you will acquaint the Duke of Newcastle that Colonel Moody and several of the Officers of the Royal Engineers serving in British Columbia under his command will have completed the usualterm term of Foreign Service in October next, and His Royal Highness the Field Marshal Commanding has enquired whether steps should be taken for their relief.

Before giving any directions in the matter, Sir George Lewis would wish to be informed whether, in His Grace's opinion, it is probable that the services of the Royal Engineers will be required inthe the Colony for any lengthened period, in which case it will be necessary to relieve the Officers in question.

I have etc. de Greys Ripon
Mr Elliot VJ 17 Jan
I think I am not wrong in stating that the opinion has long been entertained at this Office that the Corps of Royal Engineers at B. Columbia is too costly and does not yield commensurate advantages. The Duke of Newcastle's view, nearly to that effect, appears incidentally at the end of His Grace's minute on a Foreign Office letter of 1860, 10510. But any action on the question was suspended in consequence of the question that arose of stationing a Regiment in these Colonies. That question seems now to have dropped, and I should doubt whether it would at present be thought advisable to revive the proposal.

Next October the Officers of Engineers will have been out for 5 years and so their term expires. But Mr Jadis tells me that the privates were sent out on the condition that they might acquire land at the end of a service of six years. If this were the only obstacle to breaking them up on the departure of their present officers, it might easily be met by allowing them to obtain their land at the end of five instead of six years. To the men this would be a boon, whilst to the Colony it would give the advantage of being relieved so much the sooner of the heavy cost of their pay. The local authorities have never shown any great desire for the presence of a military force.

TFE 22 Jany
I think the Engineers may well be dispensed with, and I would certainly give the men the boon of 5 instead of 6 years service as entitling them to a grant of land.

There may be some risk in having no military force at all where such affairs as Sa Juan have heretofore occurred, but it is an experiment well worth trying. I trust encouragement will be given both by the W.O. and in the Colony to Volunteers, and as the Admiralty has now established a station at Esquimalt there will generally be some Marines in case of an emergency.

N 27
Mr Elliot The information we have on record as to the terms in which the Non-Commissioned Officers & Men of the Engineers were to receive Grants of land is contained in a letter to Colonel Moody dated 1st Septr 1858. (Marked in bound Vol. 4.) A Copy of this letter was sent to the War Office for information, in a letter dated 2nd Sepr—and the GovrGovernor was briefly informed of the arrangements in a Desp. of the same date, of which I annex an Extract—the remainder of the Despatch relates to other matters.

There was no doubt some personal communication on the subject between Sir Edward Lytton and the Military Authorities, as reference is made in the letter to Colonel Moody to the "suggestion of the Director General of Fortifications," which suggestions are not on record, and the letter itself was, apparently, written on verbal directions.

In answering the War Office they should I presume be referred to our letter of 2d Sepr 1858, and their concurrence in the Duke's proposal requested, and I do not see that any further steps can be taken in the matter till we receive their reply?

VJ 29 Jan
Mr Jadis On this information, I think that, under the terms of the Duke's minute on 546, we may prepare a draft to WO, saying that we are willing to dispense with the Engineers by the end of the year. Will you write such a draft? TFE 26 March
Elliot to Under-Secretary of State, War Office, 28 March 1863, expressing Newcastle's view that the services of the Royal Engineers could be dispensed with at the end of the year, with explanation.
1. Colonial Office to War Office
Downing Street
2nd September 1858 Sir,

I am directed by Secretary Sir E.B. Lytton to transmit for the information of Secretary Major General Peel a copy of a letter to Colonel Moody and also a copy of a despatch to Governor Douglas stating the terms on which the non-commissioned Officers and men of the Detachment of Royal Engineers who are about to proceed to British Columbia, may receive grants of land in the Colony.

I am &c Herman Merivale The Under Secretary of State for War
1.1 Extract, Lytton to Douglas, No. 14, 2 September 1858

I transmit to you, herewith, for your information the copy of a letter which I have addressed to Colonel Moody on the subject of granting land on certain conditions to the Non-commissioned Officers and men of the Royal Engineers, who are now going to British Columbia.

1.1.1 Lord Carnarvon to Colonel Moody
Downing Street
1st September 1858 Sir,

In case there should be any misunderstanding as to the suggestions of the Inspector General of Fortifications, that the Non Commissioned Officers and men of the Royal Engineers, who are going out to British Columbia, should receive grants of Land, Secretary Sir Edward Lytton directs me to statethat that he is willing, and the Governor shall be instructed accordingly, that the men should be allowed such grants of agricultural, not mining land, not exceeding 30 acres each after six years continuous good faithful service in British Columbia on condition of residence, and Military Service within the Colony if called upon.

I am to suggest to you that it might be advisable, with the concurrence of the Governor, to locate the men, if they should be located atall all, along the frontier, or in the neighbourhood of future Naval and Military posts.

Sir E. Lytton will send a copy of this letter to the Secretary of State for War, for his information as well as to the Governor, with whom you will confer on this subject.

I have &c Carnarvon Colonel Moody, R.E.