<persName ref="prs:seymour_f"><surname>Seymour</surname>, <forename>Frederick</forename></persName> to <persName ref="prs:cardwell"><surname>Cardwell</surname>, <forename>Edward</forename></persName> 4 October 1864, CO 60:19, no. 10955, 298. Seymour addressee Cardwell

Published by Jim Hendrickson and the University of Victoria.

Seymour, Frederick to Cardwell, Edward 4 October 1864, CO 60:19, no. 10955, 298.The Colonial Despatches of Vancouver Island and British Columbia 1846-1871, Edition 2.6, ed. James Hendrickson and the Colonial Despatches project. Victoria, B.C.: University of Victoria. https://bcgenesis.uvic.ca/B64256.html. CO 60:19 CO 60 19 10955 298 56 B.C. 1864 received 29 November co_60_19_00300r.jpg Transcribed from microfilm archives, marked up in Waterloo Script, then transformed into TEI P5 XML.

The project glossary items have xml:id attributes beginning with trm_, and we use a trm: prefix to refer to them when linking from term elements.

We link to orgs in orgs/organizations.xml using the org: prefix.

We link to places in places.xml using the plc: prefix.

We link to people in bios/*.xml using the prs: prefix.

We link to vessels in vessels/*.xml using the vsl: prefix.

We link to other documents in the collection using the cdc: prefix.

The cdt (ColDesp Document Type) prefix used on catRef/target points to a central taxonomy in the includes file.

We link to other documents in the collection using the cdc: prefix.

Despatch to London. Minutes (3), Enclosures (untranscribed) (1), Other documents (1), Marginalia (1).

This document contains mentions of Indigenous Peoples. The authors of these documents often perpetuate a negative perspective of Indigenous Peoples and it is important to look critically at these mentions. They sometimes use terminology that is now considered hurtful and offensive. To learn more about modern terminology pertaining to Indigenous Peoples, Indigenous ways of knowing, and decolonization, please refer to the Glossary of terms.

Seymour responds to Cardwell’s enquiries regarding an insurrection of the Chilicoten Indians in British Columbia. Seymour addresses the cost of the expeditions to find the killers, the population sizes of settlers and Indigneous, as well as an issue over the proper manner of correspondence between Seymour and the Admiralty. In regards to the Admiralty, Seymour also forwards a letter he wrote to Lord Gilford excusing a previous remark attributed to Seymour and advising that Seymour’s concern centred on the defenceless state of the colony, and was not intended as a personal slur towards Gilford.

Seymour, Frederick Cardwell, Edward Added abstract. Inserted revisionDesc.
No. 56 10955, CO 60/19, p. 298; received 29 November 4th October 1864 Sir,

I have had the honor to receive your Despatch No. 30 of the 1st of August, respecting the insurrection of the Chilicoten Indians in this Colony. I am highly gratified to perceive that you approve of the determination I expressed of dealing with the matter as far as lay in my power as a series of offences against the Law.

2. I am reluctant to make anyobservations observations upon a despatch so indulgent in tone as the one I have now the honor of acknowledging, but I would observe, with reference to your second paragraph that it was not so much the high rate of pay assigned to the Volunteers of the two Expeditions I regretted, as the heavy miscellaneous charges. For instance, the first that came under my notice, two hundred pounds (£200) for the conveyance of fifty rifles and ammunition to Alexandria. During three Months a force of upwards of a hundred men has been maintained upon supplies obtained mainly from the Gold regions, with their bases of supply, Alexandria or QuesnelMouth Mouth, upwards of five hundred miles from the Sea. That these supplies were difficult to obtain, even at exorbitant prices, can hardly be considered as evidencing the prosperity of the Colony.

3. The Indian insurrection is merely referred to by you as a question of Colonial importance. I would, however, beg most respectfully to point out that should a real war take place between the Indian population and the Whites, the former numbering about 60,000, the latter about 7,000 I may find myself compelled to follow in the footsteps of the Governor of Colorado, whose proclamationI I forwarded in my despatch No. 49 of the 24th of September and invite every white man to shoot each Indian he may meet. Such a proclamation would not be badly received here in a case of emergency.

4. The final paragraph of your despatch directs me to maintain a cordial cooperation with the Admiral on this Station. I can assure you that your wishes will be fully carried out on my part. Indeed, they have been forstalled. I have no copy of the hurried semi-official letter to your department in which I stated that I had "despatched" a gun boat somewhere. But my official despatch No. 8 of the20th 20th of May was, I understand, before the Lords of the Admiralty at the same time as the note referred to, and in it their Lordships may have seen stated that, "the Senior Naval Officer after some hesitation, complied with my application for assistance to the extent of supplying the Gunboat "Forward," coupled with the request that she should be detained in the Colony as short a time as possible." When so lent, I may have carelessly stated—improperly, possibly—that I had "despatched" her to Bute Inlet.

5. My correspondence with Lord Gilford created no bad feeling between us, but after it had closedwhen when he was on a visit to me, I learnt that he was annoyed by something which had been published in the Victoria Papers, and I, quite unsolicited by him, wrote the letter, copy of which I enclose. I do not and have not complained of Lord Gilford, and I shall be always happy to cooperate in the most friendly manner with him, but at the same time I reserve to myself the right of thinking that earlier assistance ought to have been afforded me. We might have saved the lives of Macdonald's party and prevented the rising of the Western branch of the Chilicoten tribe under .

6. Sir Edward Lytton's despatch No. 30of of the 10th March 1859, and the Duke of Newcastle's, No. 31 of the 21st October 1859 * certainly led me to believe that the two Gunboats would be generally available for the Service of British Columbia when our fellow Countrymen were being butchered therein.

I have the honor to be, Sir, Your most obedient humble Servant Frederick Seymour
Mr Elliot The Despatch N. 30 of 1 of Augt which the GovrGovernor replies to is in circulation. I annex a Copy of it. See 10948 referred to. VJ 29 Nov
Mr Cardwell I shdshould be inclined to treat these questions as bygones, and put the Despatch by, unless you should think it necessary to notice the end of par: 3. TFE 29/11
Seymour to Gilford, 11 June 1864, excusing a previous remark attributed to him and advising that his concern centred on the defenceless state of the colony, and was not intended as a personal slur.
Draft reply, Cardwell to Seymour, No. 53, 1 December 1864, approving of Seymour’s action, however, Cardwell remarks that he does not understand the meaning of the paragraph in which [Seymour] speak[s] of inviting every white man to shoot every Indian he might meet.
The despatch remodelled as it here stands, and the approval and signature of Mr Cardwell is done. TFE 1 Dec
Parl: Paper Part II P. 81 & Part III P. 105.