<persName ref="prs:cardwell"><surname>Cardwell</surname>, <forename>Edward</forename></persName> to <persName ref="prs:seymour_f"><surname>Seymour</surname>, <forename>Frederick</forename></persName> 1 June 1864, NAC RG7:G8C/11, 100. Cardwell addressee Seymour

Published by Jim Hendrickson and the University of Victoria.

Cardwell, Edward to Seymour, Frederick 1 June 1864, NAC RG7:G8C/11, 100.The Colonial Despatches of Vancouver Island and British Columbia 1846-1871, Edition 2.6, ed. James Hendrickson and the Colonial Despatches project. Victoria, B.C.: University of Victoria. https://bcgenesis.uvic.ca/B647407.html. NAC RG7:G8C/11 NAC RG7 G8C/11 100 7 B.C. 1864 rg7_g8c_11_00062r.jpg Transcribed from microfilm archives, marked up in Waterloo Script, then transformed into TEI P5 XML.

The project glossary items have xml:id attributes beginning with trm_, and we use a trm: prefix to refer to them when linking from term elements.

We link to orgs in orgs/organizations.xml using the org: prefix.

We link to places in places.xml using the plc: prefix.

We link to people in bios/*.xml using the prs: prefix.

We link to vessels in vessels/*.xml using the vsl: prefix.

We link to other documents in the collection using the cdc: prefix.

The cdt (ColDesp Document Type) prefix used on catRef/target points to a central taxonomy in the includes file.

We link to other documents in the collection using the cdc: prefix.

Despatch from London. Other documents (1), Marginalia (1).

Cardwell acknowledges receipt of Douglas’s despatch which includes three ordinances from the Legislature of British Columbia. Regarding a clause in the ordinance to encourage the construction of a telegraph line connecting British Columbia with the telegraph lines of the United States and for other purposes, that gives a monopoly over telegraph use to an American company, Cardwell confirms that the exclusive right of telegraphic communication can under no circumstances be allowed. He also states that if the clause giving that right be not repealed [he] shall have no other alternative left than that of advising Her Majesty to disallow the whole Ordinance.

 Cardwell, Edward Seymour, Frederick Added abstract. Inserted revisionDesc with @status="unproofed".
No. 7 NAC, RG7, G8C/11, p. 100 (CO 398/2, p. 223) 1st June 1864 Sir,

I have received your predecessor's despatch No. 14 of the 4th ultimo accompanied by three Ordinances of the Legislature of British Columbia including No. 9 of 1864 intituled An Ordinance to encourage the construction of a telegraph line connecting British Columbia withthe the telegraph lines of the United States and for other purposes.

I observe that by the 5th clause of this Ordinance there is secured to the California State Telegraph Company, for a period of twenty years after the completion of a certain telegraph line, the exclusive right of sending and receivingmessages messages between any place within the Colony of British Columbia and any other place within the territory of the United States of America to the West of the Rocky Mountains.

From the Parliamentary Paper noted in the margin * of which a copy is enclosed you will learn (what, from the correspondence between this department and Mr.Collins Collins, respecting the construction of a telegraph line to British Columbia across the North of Asia, which correspondence was communicated to you on the 10th of February last, you will already have inferred) that Her Majesty's Government are unable to sanction the establishment of any exclusiveprivileges privileges in regard to telegraphic communication, and you cannot fail to see that the strict enforcement of this principle is peculiarly indispensable in British Columbia through which Her Majesty's Government may have to communicate in very critical times and on very important matters with Her Majesty'sNaval Naval Forces on the Pacific. It will therefore be impossible that the 5th clause of the Ordinance under consideration should be allowed to remain in operation, and the California State Telegraph Company should be at once so informed.

I have hesitated to recommend the immediate disallowance of this Ordinancebecause because it appears to me that by allowing it for the present to remain in operation I shall facilitate those negotiations between the Government and the Company which will be necessary to provide either for the continuance or for the abandonment of the enterprise.

I hope that youwill will be able to make arrangements under which the understanding may proceed, but it must be clearly understood that the exclusive right of telegraphic communication can under no circumstances be allowed, and that if the clause giving that right be not repealed I shall have no other alternative left thanthat that of advising Her Majesty to disallow the whole Ordinance.

I have the honor to be Sir Your obedient servant Edward Cardwell
Parl: Paper 162—1858
18 June 1858, Schedules and extracts of correspondence between the Secretary of State and North American colonies on the subject of "giving an Exclusive Right to the Establishment of Telegraphic Communication between this Country and North America to one Company."