<persName ref="prs:seymour_f"><surname>Seymour</surname>, <forename>Frederick</forename></persName> to <persName ref="prs:cardwell"><surname>Cardwell</surname>, <forename>Edward</forename></persName> 17 March 1865, CO 60:21, no. 6173, 181. Seymour addressee Cardwell

Published by Jim Hendrickson and the University of Victoria.

Seymour, Frederick to Cardwell, Edward 17 March 1865, CO 60:21, no. 6173, 181.The Colonial Despatches of Vancouver Island and British Columbia 1846-1871, Edition 2.6, ed. James Hendrickson and the Colonial Despatches project. Victoria, B.C.: University of Victoria. https://bcgenesis.uvic.ca/B65027.html. CO 60:21 CO 60 21 6173 181 27 B.C. 1865 received 29 June co_60_21_00182r.jpg Transcribed from microfilm archives, marked up in Waterloo Script, then transformed into TEI P5 XML.

The project glossary items have xml:id attributes beginning with trm_, and we use a trm: prefix to refer to them when linking from term elements.

We link to orgs in orgs/organizations.xml using the org: prefix.

We link to places in places.xml using the plc: prefix.

We link to people in bios/*.xml using the prs: prefix.

We link to vessels in vessels/*.xml using the vsl: prefix.

We link to other documents in the collection using the cdc: prefix.

The cdt (ColDesp Document Type) prefix used on catRef/target points to a central taxonomy in the includes file.

We link to other documents in the collection using the cdc: prefix.

Despatch to London. Minutes (2).

Seymour forwards copies of an ordinance titled No. 2. An Ordinance to amend the Law of Evidence and explains that he was unable to obtain the usual summary from the Attorney General, but that the act explains itself sufficiently.

 Seymour, Frederick Cardwell, Edward Inserted revisionDesc. Added abstract. Written by Josiah Snell.
No. 27 6173, CO 60/21, p. 181; received 29 June 17th March 1865 Sir,

I have the honor to forward an Authenticated and two plain Copies of an Ordinance of the present Session of the Legislature of this Colony, entitled; No. 2. An Ordinance to amend the Law of Evidence.

2. I am

2. I am unable to procure the legal summary of the Attorney General in consequence of a pressure of business. However the Act explains fully its objects, and I need only say that it was the result of a Conference between the Judge of the Supreme Court and myself. My instructions were embodied in the present Ordinance by the Attorney General.

I have the honor to be Sir, Your most obedient humble Servant Frederick Seymour
Reserve for Sir F. Rogers. ABd 29 June TFE 29 June
Sanction. FR 27/7 EC 27