<persName ref="prs:cardwell"><surname>Cardwell</surname>, <forename>Edward</forename></persName> to <persName ref="prs:seymour_f"><surname>Seymour</surname>, <forename>Frederick</forename></persName> 3 August 1865, NAC RG7:G8C/12, 243. Cardwell addressee Seymour

Published by Jim Hendrickson and the University of Victoria.

Cardwell, Edward to Seymour, Frederick 3 August 1865, NAC RG7:G8C/12, 243.The Colonial Despatches of Vancouver Island and British Columbia 1846-1871, Edition 2.6, ed. James Hendrickson and the Colonial Despatches project. Victoria, B.C.: University of Victoria. https://bcgenesis.uvic.ca/B657053.html. NAC RG7:G8C/12 NAC RG7 G8C/12 243 53 B.C. 1865 rg7_g8c_12_00187r.jpg Transcribed from microfilm archives, marked up in Waterloo Script, then transformed into TEI P5 XML.

The project glossary items have xml:id attributes beginning with trm_, and we use a trm: prefix to refer to them when linking from term elements.

We link to orgs in orgs/organizations.xml using the org: prefix.

We link to places in places.xml using the plc: prefix.

We link to people in bios/*.xml using the prs: prefix.

We link to vessels in vessels/*.xml using the vsl: prefix.

We link to other documents in the collection using the cdc: prefix.

The cdt (ColDesp Document Type) prefix used on catRef/target points to a central taxonomy in the includes file.

We link to other documents in the collection using the cdc: prefix.

Cardwell, Edward to Seymour, Frederick 3 August 1865, NAC RG7:G8C/12, 243.

Despatch from London.

Cardwell, Edward Seymour, Frederick Inserted revisionDesc with @status="unproofed".
No. 53 NAC, RG7, G8C/12, p. 243 (CO 398/2, p. 337) 3 August 1865 Sir,

I have the honor to acknowledge the receipt of your Despatch No. 46 of the 9th May, forwarding copies of an Ordinance passed at the last Session of the Legislature of British Columbia, entitled No. 4 "An Ordinance in aid of the Trustees Relief Act."

There

There appear to be one or two errors of language in this Ordinance which it may be worth while to point out to you.

In Section 1 after the words "in the name" it would be proper to insert "or to the account."

The first phrase of Section II "all payments heretofore made" does not clearly show what payments the Clause was intended to cover. This should be made clear. It was probably intended to protect "all such payments andtransfers transfers heretofore made in the manner aforesaid." But whatever was the intention of the Legislature, the language should, I think, be more accurately adjusted to it.

Your Government will also do well to consider whether such an Act as that of 10 and 11 Victoria Cap: 96 would be extended to the Colony by the general words of the Proclamation of the 19th November 1858. It appears to me very advisable to obviate any doubt on this point by specifically enacting that theImperial Imperial Statute with certain specified substitutions (including those provided for by this Ordinance) should be deemed to have been in force in the Colony, from the 19th November 1858, and declared in terms that the Supreme Court of the Colony should be competent to exercise all powers conferred by that Act on the Court of Chancery, the Lord Chancellor and the Master of the Rolls.

I have the honor to be Sir, Your most obedient humble servant Edward Cardwell