<persName ref="prs:leveson_g"><surname>Leveson-Gower</surname>, <forename>Granville</forename> <forename>George</forename></persName> to <persName ref="prs:seymour_f"><surname>Seymour</surname>, <forename>Frederick</forename></persName> 16 February 1869, NAC RG7:G8C/16, 54. Granville addressee Seymour

Published by Jim Hendrickson and the University of Victoria.

Leveson-Gower, Granville George to Seymour, Frederick 16 February 1869, NAC RG7:G8C/16, 54.The Colonial Despatches of Vancouver Island and British Columbia 1846-1871, Edition 2.6, ed. James Hendrickson and the Colonial Despatches project. Victoria, B.C.: University of Victoria. https://bcgenesis.uvic.ca/B697014.html. NAC RG7:G8C/16 NAC RG7 G8C/16 54 14 B.C. 1869 rg7_g8c_16_00032r.jpg Transcribed from microfilm archives, marked up in Waterloo Script, then transformed into TEI P5 XML.

The project glossary items have xml:id attributes beginning with trm_, and we use a trm: prefix to refer to them when linking from term elements.

We link to orgs in orgs/organizations.xml using the org: prefix.

We link to places in places.xml using the plc: prefix.

We link to people in bios/*.xml using the prs: prefix.

We link to vessels in vessels/*.xml using the vsl: prefix.

We link to other documents in the collection using the cdc: prefix.

The cdt (ColDesp Document Type) prefix used on catRef/target points to a central taxonomy in the includes file.

We link to other documents in the collection using the cdc: prefix.

Despatch from London.

Granville responds to the claims in a Petition to Her Majesty from the Municipal Council of New Westminster regarding selecting Victoria as British Columbia’s capital and the use of New Westminster’s land fund. Granville directs the petitioners to contact British Columbia’s Legislative Council.

Leveson-Gower, Granville George Seymour, Frederick Added abstract. Inserted revisionDesc with @status="unproofed". Changed idno @type="received" into a date element. Gave existing date an @type="sent" and reordered bibl contents.
No. 14 NAC, RG7, G8C/16, p. 54 (CO 398/5, p. 241) 16 February 1869 Sir,

I have the honor to acknowledge the receipt of your Despatch No. 127 of 30th November enclosing a Petition to Her Majesty from the Municipal Council of New Westminster, and a Copy of one which will be presented to both Houses of Parliament from the same body claiming compensationon on account of the removal of the Capital of the Colony to Victoria, and complaining that the New Westminster Land Fund has not been employed in the improvement of the Roads and Streets.

I have been unable to advise Her Majesty that the Memorialists' claim for compensation is well founded.

When New Westminster was proclaimed the Capital of British Columbia, I am not aware that the Government gave, or was asked to give, any pledge that the Capital would never under any circumstances be removed. It isindeed indeed evident that if any such pledge had been asked it would have been peremptorily refused, or if made by the Governor would have been disallowed by the Home Government.

It is indispensable that the Supreme Power in a young Country should remain at liberty to change the Site of the Capital, if necessary on Sanitary, political or Commercial, or any other sufficient grounds, and every land purchaser in the neighbourhood of a Capital buys his land subject to this possibility, and though his natural expectations that thesetermination determination of Government will not be hastily reversed are entitled to all practicable consideration from the Government, yet he can have no claim to indemnity in case these expectations are disappointed.

Much therefore as I regret any losses which have been sustained by the purchasers of land in New Westminster, I cannot recommend Her Majesty to comply with the Memorial from the Municipal Council of that place.

With regard to the misapplication of the Land Fund, I have to observe that no documents are referred to either in supportof of the allegation that the purchase money of Town lots in New Westminster was to be devoted to improving Streets and Roads in the City or of the allegation that they have not been so devoted.

On these points the first step of the Memorialists should be to bring their case before the Legislative Council through those Gentlemen by whom they are substantially represented in that body, and it would be for the local Government to consider, at least in the first instance, by what form of enquiry the grievance should be ascertained, and for the localLegislature Legislature to provide for its removal.

I have the honor to be Sir, Your most obedient humble Servant Granville