<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-model href="../schemas/coldesp.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="../schemas/coldesp.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:id="B70009"><!--IC; 2019-02-05, marking names, places, vessels, and fn --><!-- IC, April 2019, PB tags -->

<teiHeader>
<fileDesc><titleStmt><title><persName ref="prs:musgrave_a"><surname>Musgrave</surname>,  <forename>Anthony</forename></persName> to <persName ref="prs:leveson_g"><surname>Leveson-Gower</surname>, <forename>Granville</forename> <forename>George</forename></persName> 29 January 1870, CO 60:38, no. 2543, 82.</title>
<author><persName ref="prs:musgrave_a">Musgrave</persName></author>
<respStmt><resp>addressee</resp>
<persName ref="prs:leveson_g">Granville</persName>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><p>Published by Jim Hendrickson and the University of Victoria.</p>
</publicationStmt><notesStmt><note xml:id="B70009_citation"><bibl><persName ref="prs:musgrave_a"><surname>Musgrave</surname>,  <forename>Anthony</forename></persName> to <persName ref="prs:leveson_g"><surname>Leveson-Gower</surname>, <forename>Granville</forename> <forename>George</forename></persName> 29 January 1870, CO 60:38, no. 2543, 82.<title level="m">The Colonial Despatches of Vancouver Island and British Columbia 1846-1871</title>, Edition 2.6, ed. James Hendrickson and the Colonial Despatches project. Victoria, B.C.: University of Victoria. <ref target="B70009.html">https://bcgenesis.uvic.ca/B70009.html</ref>.
                    </bibl></note></notesStmt>
<sourceDesc><bibl><idno type="archivalId">CO 60:38</idno>
<idno type="repository">CO</idno>
<idno type="coNumber">60</idno>
<idno type="coVol">38</idno>
<idno type="coRegistration">2543</idno>
<idno type="page">82</idno>
<idno type="despatchNo">9</idno>
<series>B.C.</series>
<date when="1870-01-29" type="sent">1870</date>
<date type="received" when="1870-03-09">received 9 March</date>
<biblScope type="startPageImage" facs="co_60_38/co_60_38_00083r.jpg">co_60_38_00083r.jpg</biblScope>
<note>Transcribed from microfilm archives, marked up in Waterloo Script, then transformed into TEI P5 XML.</note>
</bibl>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>

<encodingDesc>
<styleDefDecl scheme="css"/>
<listPrefixDef xml:id="incPrefixDefs">
        
        <prefixDef ident="trm" matchPattern="(.+)" replacementPattern="https://bcgenesis.uvic.ca/glossary.htm#trm_$1">
          <p>The project glossary items have <att>xml:id</att> attributes beginning
          with <code>trm_</code>, and we use a <code>trm:</code> prefix to refer to
          them when linking from <gi>term</gi> elements.</p>
        </prefixDef>

        <prefixDef ident="org" matchPattern="(.+)" replacementPattern="https://bcgenesis.uvic.ca/$1.html">
          <p>We link to orgs in <code>orgs/organizations.xml</code> using the <code>org:</code> prefix.</p>
        </prefixDef>
        
        <prefixDef ident="plc" matchPattern="(.+)" replacementPattern="https://bcgenesis.uvic.ca/$1.html">
          <p>We link to places in <code>places.xml</code> using the <code>plc:</code> prefix.</p>
        </prefixDef>
        
        <prefixDef ident="prs" matchPattern="(.+)" replacementPattern="https://bcgenesis.uvic.ca/$1.html">
          <p>We link to people in <code>bios/*.xml</code> using the <code>prs:</code> prefix.</p>
        </prefixDef>
        
        <prefixDef ident="vsl" matchPattern="(.+)" replacementPattern="https://bcgenesis.uvic.ca/$1.html">
          <p>We link to vessels in <code>vessels/*.xml</code> using the <code>vsl:</code> prefix.</p>
        </prefixDef>
        
        <prefixDef ident="cdc" matchPattern="(.+)" replacementPattern="https://bcgenesis.uvic.ca/$1.html">
          <p>We link to other documents in the collection using the <code>cdc:</code> prefix.</p>
        </prefixDef>
        
        <prefixDef ident="cdt" matchPattern="(.*)" replacementPattern="http://bcgenesis.uvic.ca/document_types.xml#$1">
          <p>The cdt (ColDesp Document Type) prefix used on <gi>catRef</gi>/<att>target</att> points
            to a central taxonomy in the includes file.</p>
        </prefixDef>
        
        <prefixDef ident="img" matchPattern="(.+)" replacementPattern="https://bcgenesis.uvic.ca/imageBrowser.html?img=$1">
          <p>We link to other documents in the collection using the <code>cdc:</code> prefix.</p>
        </prefixDef>
        
      </listPrefixDef></encodingDesc>
<profileDesc><abstract><p><persName ref="prs:musgrave_a"><surname>Musgrave</surname>,  <forename>Anthony</forename></persName> to <persName ref="prs:leveson_g"><surname>Leveson-Gower</surname>, <forename>Granville</forename> <forename>George</forename></persName> 29 January 1870, CO 60:38, no. 2543, 82.</p>
<p>Despatch to London. 
                Minutes (12), Enclosures (untranscribed) (1), Other documents (2).</p>
</abstract><correspDesc>
<correspAction type="sent">
<persName ref="prs:musgrave_a"><surname>Musgrave</surname>,  <forename>Anthony</forename></persName>
<date when="1870-01-29"/>
</correspAction>
<correspAction type="received">
<persName ref="prs:leveson_g"><surname>Leveson-Gower</surname>, <forename>Granville</forename> <forename>George</forename></persName>
<date when="1870-03-09"/></correspAction></correspDesc></profileDesc>
 
<revisionDesc status="unproofed">
<change when="2019-04-09">Inserted revisionDesc with @status="unproofed".</change>
<change resp="lyallg" when="2019-05-14">Changed idno @type="received" into a date element. Gave existing date an @type="sent" and reordered bibl contents.</change>
</revisionDesc>
 
 

</teiHeader>
 
<text><body>

<!--&amp;lt;name type="cdorigin"&amp;gt;Musgrave&amp;lt;/name&amp;gt; -->
<!--&amp;lt;name type="cdaddres"&amp;gt;Granville&amp;lt;/name&amp;gt; -->
<!-- ..cm =================================================================== -->
<div type="despatch_to_london">
<head>
No. 9
</head>
<opener><ref type="co_ref">2543, CO 60/38, p. 82; received 9 March
</ref>
<date when="1870-01-29">29<hi style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 80%;">th</hi> January 1870</date>
<salute>My Lord,</salute>
</opener>
<p>
I have the honor to forward to Your Lordship the Colonial
Estimates for <date when="1870">1870</date> accompanied by a Report, from the Auditor
General, and all the Returns which appear to be required by the
Instructions contained in Your Despatch<fw type="catchword" style="text-align: right;">N<hi style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 80%;">o</hi></fw><pb facs="co_60_38/co_60_38_00083v.jpg"/> N<hi style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 80%;">o</hi> 86, of the <date when="1869-08-18">18<hi style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 80%;">th</hi>
August last</date>. I have been obliged to bestow much personal
attention and pains upon the preparation of these papers. They
would have been forwarded earlier but for the unfortunate
accident which still confines me a Prisoner in my bed. They are
now I hope nearly as accurate as it is practicable to make them
in this Government; but the great distance from <placeName ref="plc:victoria">Victoria</placeName> of some
Districts prevents Returns<fw type="catchword" style="text-align: right;">from</fw><pb facs="co_60_38/co_60_38_00084r.jpg"/> from them being received in time to
be included and the Statements are therefore in some respects
necessarily only approximate.
</p>
<p>
2. The Financial position of the Colony is not satisfactory to
me. The Revenue appears to have been hitherto almost regularly
overestimated for several years, while annual Votes have almost
as regularly been exceeded. The result is a balance on the
current Bank Account to the Debit of the<fw type="catchword" style="text-align: right;">Colony</fw><pb facs="co_60_38/co_60_38_00084v.jpg"/> Colony on the <date when="1869-12-31">31<hi style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 80%;">st</hi>
December</date>, amounting to $27,348, twenty seven thousand, three
hundred and forty-eight dollars, bearing compound Interest at 12
per cent per annum; while there are Loans outstanding, for the
most part overdue, and for the liquidation of which no provision
has been made, amounting to $291,632, two hundred and ninety one
thousand, six hundred<fw type="catchword" style="text-align: right;">and</fw><pb facs="co_60_38/co_60_38_00085r.jpg"/> and thirty two dollars more, and of which
the greater part bears interest also at twelve per cent—making
altogether the sum of $318,980—three hundred and eighteen
thousand, nine hundred and eighty dollars, or £65,768, sixty
five thousand, seven hundred and sixty eight pounds, which will
be found in the Statement of Liabilities under the head of
Temporary Loans. I annex a detailed<fw type="catchword" style="text-align: right;">Statement</fw><pb facs="co_60_38/co_60_38_00085v.jpg"/> Statement shewing the items
of which the total is composed.
</p>
<p>
3. It is not right that this debt should remain without
provision for its repayment. So long as they receive 12 per
cent the holders of the Debentures and the Bank of <placeName ref="plc:british_columbia">British
Columbia</placeName> may not press for settlement; but they might do so at
any time, and in that case the Colony is without the means of
meeting its engagements.<fw type="catchword" style="text-align: right;">The</fw><pb facs="co_60_38/co_60_38_00086r.jpg"/> The Colonial Securities Company hold
more than one third of the Debentures. I have reason to believe
that they would take up the whole of this debt at six per cent
interest under new arrangements, guaranteeing the issue of the
loan at not less than 85 per cent, and probably better terms may
be obtained. But even at 85 per cent, if the Loan should be
payable in thirty years, the annual provision for interest,<fw type="catchword" style="text-align: right;">sinking</fw><pb facs="co_60_38/co_60_38_00086v.jpg"/>
sinking fund, and expenses of the loan would not amount to ten
per cent and such an arrangement would be far more advantageous
to the Colony than the present state of the finances.
</p>
<p>
4. Under these circumstances I propose to introduce an
Ordinance in the Legislative Council to authorize the
consolidation of the floating debt. I believe it to be unlikely
that<fw type="catchword" style="text-align: right;">we</fw><pb facs="co_60_38/co_60_38_00087r.jpg"/> we could raise a loan on better terms by advertizing for
Tenders in <placeName ref="plc:london">London</placeName> just now, than may be obtained by private
negociation with the Colonial Securities Company, while much
time would be consumed by so doing, and the state of affairs on
the Continent may tend to raise the price of money in a few
months. Unless therefore Your Lordship should forbid my
proceeding by Telegraph, I<fw type="catchword" style="text-align: right;">shall</fw><pb facs="co_60_38/co_60_38_00087v.jpg"/> shall assume your permission to make
such arrangements as the Council may concur with me in regarding
as desirable.
</p>
<closer>
I have the honor to be,<lb/>
My Lord,<lb/>
Your most obedient<lb/>
humble Servant<lb/>
<persName ref="prs:musgrave_a">A. Musgrave</persName>
</closer>
<!-- ..cm =================================================================== -->
</div>
<div type="minutes">
<div type="minute_entry"><pb facs="co_60_38/co_60_38_00088r.jpg"/>
<ab>
<persName ref="prs:herbert_rgw">M<hi style="text-decoration: underline; vertical-align: super; font-size: 80%;">r</hi> Herbert</persName><lb/>
I send this on to you without examination of the Returns &amp;c
because you may think it desirable to telegraph back at once to
<persName ref="prs:musgrave_a"><choice><abbr>Gov<hi style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 80%;">r</hi></abbr><expan>Governor</expan></choice> Musgrave</persName> with reference to his intention of dealing with
this temporary Debt—stated at £65,768. He might be told to do
nothing til he receives <persName ref="prs:leveson_g">Lord Granville</persName>'s despatch of the <date when="1870-02-23">23
 Feb<hi style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 80%;">y</hi></date> (sent on<pb facs="co_60_38/co_60_38_00088v.jpg"/> the <date when="1870-02-26">26<hi style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 80%;">th</hi></date>) sending the <orgName ref="org:ocac">Crown Agents</orgName> proposal for
dealing with the whole Debt—1333. He
<hi style="text-decoration: underline;">ought</hi> to receive it about the <date when="1870-03-23">23<hi style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 80%;">d</hi></date>.
</ab>
<closer><signed><persName ref="prs:cox_c">CC</persName>
<date when="1870-03-10">
10/3
</date>
</signed>
</closer>
</div>
<div type="minute_entry"><pb facs="co_60_38/co_60_38_00088v.jpg"/>
<ab>
I think certainly telegraph as proposed. "Floating Debt
Consolidation wait for Despatch sent twenty sixth February."
</ab>
<p>
At once.
</p>
<closer><signed><persName ref="prs:herbert_rgw">RGWH</persName>
<date when="1870-03-10">
Mar 10/70
</date>
</signed>
</closer>
</div>
<div type="minute_entry"><pb facs="co_60_38/co_60_38_00088v.jpg"/>
<ab>
Sent 5:15 P.M.
</ab>
<closer><signed><persName ref="prs:blake">EB</persName>
<date when="1870-03-10">
10.3.70
</date>
</signed>
</closer>
</div>
<div type="minute_entry"><pb facs="co_60_38/co_60_38_00088v.jpg"/>
<ab>
Done.
</ab>
<closer><signed><persName ref="prs:cox_c">CC</persName>
<date when="1870-03-10">
10/3
</date>
</signed>
</closer>
</div>
<div type="minute_entry"><pb facs="co_60_38/co_60_38_00088v.jpg"/>
<ab>
<persName ref="prs:strachey_w">M<hi style="text-decoration: underline; vertical-align: super; font-size: 80%;">r</hi> Strachey</persName><lb/>
I circulate this despatch again. I conclude the enclosures are
only sent for information<pb facs="co_60_38/co_60_38_00089r.jpg"/> as the Estimates have not yet been
laid before the Council—&amp; will reach us as passed with the
usual Appropriation Ordinance. As to the floating Debt
instructions have been sent to him by telegraph.
</ab>
<closer><signed><persName ref="prs:cox_c">CC</persName>
<date when="1870-03-12">
12/3
</date>
</signed>
</closer>
</div>
<div type="minute_entry"><pb facs="co_60_38/co_60_38_00089r.jpg"/>
<ab>
<persName ref="prs:herbert_rgw">M<hi style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 80%;">r</hi> Herbert</persName><lb/>
The Governor has in the main fulfilled in a satisfactory manner
the Instructions given by <persName ref="prs:leveson_g">Lord Granville</persName>'s despatch N<hi style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 80%;">o</hi> 86, <date when="1869-08-18">Aug
18/69</date> (dft in 21/8153/67 <placeName ref="plc:british_columbia">B. Columbia</placeName>, herewith)
with respect to the form of submitting the annual Estimates, but
he has, somewhat inaccurately, lost sight of the very first &amp;
most distinct of these Instructions: "I have to instruct you in
the first place not to separate<pb facs="co_60_38/co_60_38_00089v.jpg"/> in future the Appropriation
Ordinances &amp; the Estimates on which they are founded." Last
year the Appropriation Ordinance was sent from the Colony on the
<date when="1869-03-19">19 March</date>, &amp; the Estimates not till the <date when="1869-06-24">24<hi style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 80%;">th</hi> June</date>. Now we
receive the Estimates first, &amp; there is as yet no Ordinance.
</ab>
<p>
The Governor <choice><abbr>sh<hi style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 80%;">d</hi></abbr><expan>should</expan></choice> , I presume, be again informed that the annual
Estimates &amp; Appropriation Ordinance <choice><abbr>sh<hi style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 80%;">d</hi></abbr><expan>should</expan></choice> be sent together.
</p>
<p>
It is satisfactory to find that there was no foundation for
<persName ref="prs:seymour_f">Governor Seymour</persName>'s off-hand
<hi style="text-decoration: underline;">dictum</hi>
(see para: 2 of <persName ref="prs:leveson_g">L<hi style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 80%;">d</hi> Granville</persName>'s despatch of <date when="1869-08-18">Aug<hi style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 80%;">t</hi> 18/69</date> already
quoted) that the printed Instructions to the Straits, enclosed
to him as a guide,
<hi style="text-decoration: underline;">'were not applicable to <placeName ref="plc:british_columbia">B. Columbia</placeName></hi>.'
They are now found to be applicable in almost every particular,
&amp; we here have a totally complete collection of the prescribed
statements. 1. Estimates. 2. Assets &amp; Liabilities for <date when="1869-01-01">Jan 1/69</date>
&amp; <date when="1869-12-31">Dec 31/69</date>. 3. Cash Transactions for <date when="1869">1869</date> (<date from="1869-01-01" to="1869-12-31">Jan<hi style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 80%;">y</hi> to 31 Dec<hi style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 80%;">r</hi></date>).
 4. Table<pb facs="co_60_38/co_60_38_00090r.jpg"/> of Laws or Ordinances, constituting the authority for
the Expenditure estimated (the number of the Appropriation Ordinance
for <date when="1870">1870</date> is left blank, in the table sent—I suppose
because it has not been passed). 5. Report of Auditor General on
the financial arrangements.
</p>
<p>
It will, however, be advisable, I think, to point out that the
following are defects which <choice><abbr>sh<hi style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 80%;">d</hi></abbr><expan>should</expan></choice> be remedied on future occasions.
</p>
<p>
(1) The returns here submitted of Assets &amp; Liabilities, include
the permanent Debts &amp; sinking fund. This is erroneous. The
floating or temporary debt <choice><abbr>sh<hi style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 80%;">d</hi></abbr><expan>should</expan></choice> no doubt appear among the
liabilities, but permanent debt &amp; in like manner Sinking fund
<choice><abbr>sh<hi style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 80%;">d</hi></abbr><expan>should</expan></choice> be given in a separate statement, as pointed out towards
the end of para: 2 of the printed despatch to the Straits (see
the enclosure with dft <choice><abbr>desp<hi style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 80%;">h</hi></abbr><expan>despatch</expan></choice> of <date when="1869-08-18">Aug<hi style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 80%;">t</hi> 18/69</date> herewith).
</p>
<p>
(2) The
<hi style="text-decoration: underline;">detail</hi> in the Estimates<pb facs="co_60_38/co_60_38_00090v.jpg"/> does not extend (as far as I see) to the
Expenditure for civil Establishments sanctioned by permanent
Laws (Governor's &amp; other salaries). Only the
<hi style="text-decoration: underline;">lump</hi> amounts under these Laws appear to be given in the Estimates.
I think it <choice><abbr>sh<hi style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 80%;">d</hi></abbr><expan>should</expan></choice> be observed to the Governor, that the Estimates
<choice><abbr>sh<hi style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 80%;">d</hi></abbr><expan>should</expan></choice> set out in detail the entire proposed Expenditure for the
year, at the same time that they distinguish (as is of course
proper,) what has been voted by permanent Law from what will
rest on the annual Appropriation Ordinance.
</p>
<p>
In giving these suggested instructions to remedy defects, <persName ref="prs:leveson_g">Lord
Granvill</persName>e will I presume express much satisfaction with the very
great improvement which <persName ref="prs:musgrave_a">Governor Musgrave</persName> has effected in the
 mode of submitting the finance arrangements for the year.<pb facs="co_60_38/co_60_38_00091r.jpg"/> (Last
year we <choice><abbr>rec<hi style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 80%;">d</hi></abbr><expan>received</expan></choice> the Appropriation Ordinance &amp; Estimates literally
under envelopes, without a syllable of explanation).
Looking at the extract of <orgName ref="org:treasury">the Treasury</orgName> letter of <date when="1870-02-03">Feb 3/70</date>, to
this office, annexed to Agents/1333/70 (<date when="1870-01-31">Jan<hi style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 80%;">y</hi> 31/70</date>), I
conclude there is hardly any occasion to communicate these
papers to <orgName ref="org:treasury">the Treasury</orgName>, or if this is necessary, I suppose it
<choice><abbr>sh<hi style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 80%;">d</hi></abbr><expan>should</expan></choice> be done only by enclosing
for Treas<hi style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 80%;">y</hi> information copies of the Governor's <choice><abbr>desp<hi style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 80%;">h</hi></abbr><expan>despatch</expan></choice> &amp;
enclosures, &amp; of the proposed reply, when sent off, with a
[hith?] Form.
<!-- .cm 90 see also same phrase, minute on p. 93 -->
</p>
<p>
I have had little to do with <placeName ref="plc:british_columbia">B. Columbia</placeName> financial affairs
beyond the question of forms of statement, &amp; am therefore not
a good judge of the merits of the Estimates, but I do not myself
observe any ground for disapproving them. It will, however, be
proper to observe, in writing to the Governor,<pb facs="co_60_38/co_60_38_00091v.jpg"/> to the effect
above suggested—that <persName ref="prs:leveson_g">Lord Granville</persName> postpones sanctioning the
Estimates till he receives the Appropriation Ordinance, shewing
that they have been adopted by the Legisl<hi style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 80%;">ve</hi> Council.
</p>
<closer><signed><persName ref="prs:strachey_w">WS</persName>
<date when="1870-03-14">
March 14
</date>
</signed>
</closer>
</div>
<div type="minute_entry"><pb facs="co_60_38/co_60_38_00091v.jpg"/>
<ab>
I quite agree with <persName ref="prs:strachey_w">M<hi style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 80%;">r</hi> Strachey</persName>; &amp; with reference to the point
marked (2) at the bottom of the 3<hi style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 80%;">d</hi> page of his minute, I would
tell the <choice><abbr>Gov<hi style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 80%;">r</hi></abbr><expan>Governor</expan></choice> that the best way of giving the information
suggested as to money secured by permanent enactments &amp; not
subject to annual vote, is to print, preceding the detail of
establishments, (page 5 of estimates) a tabular statement of the
sums so secured.
</ab>
<closer><signed><persName ref="prs:herbert_rgw">RGWH</persName>
<date when="1870-03-18">
Mar 18/70
</date>
</signed>
<signed><persName ref="prs:monsell_w">WM</persName>
<date when="1870-03-18">
18/3
</date>
</signed>
<signed><persName ref="prs:leveson_g">G</persName>
<date when="1870-03-19">
19/3
</date>
</signed>
</closer>
</div>
<div type="minute_entry"><pb facs="co_60_38/co_60_38_00091v.jpg"/>
<ab>
<persName ref="prs:strachey_w">M<hi style="text-decoration: underline; vertical-align: super; font-size: 80%;">r</hi> Strachey</persName><lb/>
 Have you not overlooked the<pb facs="co_60_38/co_60_38_00092r.jpg"/> fact that these Estimates are only
copies of the Estimates as the <choice><abbr>Gov<hi style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 80%;">r</hi></abbr><expan>Governor</expan></choice> is going to lay them before
the Legislative Council—&amp; that they are only sent for
information &amp; not for sanction or otherwise. The Appropriation
Ordinance has not even been introduced, so that any number in
the table you refer to could not be inserted.
</ab>
<closer><signed><persName ref="prs:cox_c">CC</persName>
<date when="1870-03-21">
21/3
</date>
</signed>
</closer>
</div>
<div type="minute_entry"><pb facs="co_60_38/co_60_38_00092r.jpg"/>
<ab>
I was aware of this. I have, however, written the draft to
<choice><abbr>Gov<hi style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 80%;">r</hi></abbr><expan>Governor</expan></choice> so as to shew that we have not overlooked the fact
referred to by <persName ref="prs:cox_c">M<hi style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 80%;">r</hi> Cox</persName>.
</ab>
<closer><signed><persName ref="prs:strachey_w">WS</persName>
<date when="1870-03-29">
Mch 29
</date>
</signed>
</closer>
</div>
<div type="minute_entry"><pb facs="co_60_38/co_60_38_00092r.jpg"/>
<ab>
See subsequent 30/4682 <date when="1870-03-25">Mar 25—70</date>.
</ab>
<closer><signed><persName ref="prs:blake">[EB]</persName>
</signed>
</closer>
<!-- ..cm =================================================================== -->
</div>
</div>
<div type="enclosure_list">
<div type="enclosure_entry">
<ab>
Colonial Estimates, <placeName ref="plc:british_columbia">British Columbia</placeName>, <date when="1870">1870</date> (19 printed pages).
<!-- ..cm =================================================================== -->
</ab>
</div>
</div>
<div type="other_files">
<div type="other_entry"><pb facs="co_60_38/co_60_38_00093r.jpg"/>
<ab>
Draft reply, <persName ref="prs:herbert_rgw">Herbert</persName> (for
<persName ref="prs:leveson_g">Granville</persName>) to <persName ref="prs:musgrave_a">Musgrave</persName>, No. 24, <date when="1870-03-10">10 March 1870</date>.
</ab>
</div>
<div type="other_entry"><div><pb facs="co_60_38/co_60_38_00094r.jpg"/>
<ab>
Draft reply, <persName ref="prs:leveson_g">Granville</persName> to <persName ref="prs:musgrave_a">Musgrave</persName>, No. 35, <date when="1870-04-01">1 April 1870</date>.
</ab>
</div>
<div type="minutes">
<div type="minute_entry"><pb facs="co_60_38/co_60_38_00098r.jpg"/>
<ab>
Copies of 2543 <placeName ref="plc:british_columbia">B. Columbia</placeName> &amp; enclosures, &amp; of this reply, when sent
off, to go to Treasury for information with a [hith?] Form.
</ab>
<closer><signed><persName ref="prs:strachey_w">WS</persName>
<date when="1870-03-29">
Mc<hi style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 80%;">h</hi> 29
</date>
</signed>
</closer>
</div>
 
<div type="minute_entry"><pb facs="co_60_38/co_60_38_00094r.jpg"/>
<ab>
? Not now.
</ab>
<closer><signed><persName ref="prs:cox_c">CC</persName>
<date when="1869-03-31">
31/3
</date>
</signed>
</closer>
</div>
</div>
</div>
 
 
</div></body>
</text>
</TEI>