<persName ref="prs:douglas_j"><surname>Douglas</surname>, <forename>James</forename></persName> to <persName ref="prs:lytton_egeb"><surname>Lytton</surname>, <forename>Edward</forename> <forename>George</forename> <forename>Earle</forename> <forename>Bulwer</forename></persName> 12 August 1859, CO 305:11, no. 9709, 68. Douglas addressee Lytton

Published by Jim Hendrickson and the University of Victoria.

Douglas, James to Lytton, Edward George Earle Bulwer 12 August 1859, CO 305:11, no. 9709, 68.The Colonial Despatches of Vancouver Island and British Columbia 1846-1871, Edition 2.6, ed. James Hendrickson and the Colonial Despatches project. Victoria, B.C.: University of Victoria. https://bcgenesis.uvic.ca/V59033.html. CO 305:11 CO 305 11 9709 68 33 V.I. 1859 registered 28 September co_60_04_00071r.jpg Transcribed from microfilm archives, marked up in Waterloo Script, then transformed into TEI P5 XML.

The project glossary items have xml:id attributes beginning with trm_, and we use a trm: prefix to refer to them when linking from term elements.

We link to orgs in orgs/organizations.xml using the org: prefix.

We link to places in places.xml using the plc: prefix.

We link to people in bios/*.xml using the prs: prefix.

We link to vessels in vessels/*.xml using the vsl: prefix.

We link to other documents in the collection using the cdc: prefix.

The cdt (ColDesp Document Type) prefix used on catRef/target points to a central taxonomy in the includes file.

We link to other documents in the collection using the cdc: prefix.

Despatch to London. Enclosures (untranscribed) (1), Other documents (1).

Douglas forwards a copy of a despatch from Brigadier General Harney of the United States Army, Commanding the Troops in Washington Territory, referring to the subject of the occupation of San Juan Island by US troops, and reasons for the same, noting that Harney does not touch upon the question of sovereignty. Douglas argues that Harney's despatch has clearly established that the military occupation of San Juan has been undertaken without the knowledge or authority of the Government of the United States, and upon grounds that are entirely false.

 Douglas, James Lytton, Edward George Earle Bulwer Inserted revisionDesc.Added abstract.
No. 33 9709, CO 305/11, p. 68; registered 28 September 12 August 1859

I have the honor to forward to you herewith the Copy of a Despatch which I received late on the evening of the 10th Instant from Brigadier General HarneyHarney of the United States Army, Commanding the Troops in Washington Territory, referring to the subject of the occupation of San Juan Island by a body of United States Troops, and acquainting me with the reasons which induced him to undertake such a movement.

2. It will be noticed that General Harney does not touch upon the question of sovereignty. He states that hehe placed a Military Command upon the Island of San Juan to protect the American Citizens residing on the Island from the insults and indignities which the British Authorities of Vancouver's Island, and the establishment of the Hudson's Bay Company have recently offered them, by sending a British Ship of War from Vancouver's Island to convey the Chief Factor of the Hudson's Bay Company to San Juan, for the purpose of seizing an American Citizen, and forcibly transporting him to Vancouver's Island to be triedtried by British Laws.

3. It is therefore evident that the occupation of the Island is owing solely to orders issued by General Harney.

4. Did the reasons for the movement, which he alleges, exist, they would not justify him in acting as he has done by placing American Troops upon San Juan without giving me the slightest previous intimation; but the reasons do not exist; the tale which has been imposed upon him isis a fabrication. No British Man of War was sent from Vancouver's Island, with the Chief Factor of the Hudson's Bay Company, to seize an American Citizen, and to transport him to Vancouver's Island; nor has any act of a like nature ever happened. On the contrary although numbers of American Citizens have recently squatted upon San Juan, no interference with them has occurred, or has even been contemplated. They have been allowed to remain unmolested, out of respect and considerationconsideration for the friendly Government to which they belonged, and which Government we felt well assured would readily atone for any wrong done by its Citizens.

5. It being, therefore, clearly established that the military occupation of San Juan has been undertaken without the knowledge or authority of the Government of the United States, and upon grounds that are entirely false, both in fact and in principle, national courtesy demands that the question should be referred to the Federal Cabinet; as we have no right to presume that they will for one moment support the course adopted by General Harney.

6. Under that course it would be very easy for me, in following no more than the ordinary line of my duty, to plunge the two Countries into all the agonies of a deadly contest—indeed the greatest prudence is required to avoid it—but I can scarcely presume that Her Majestys Government would desire or approve of such a measure, and now I conceive, under the circumstances, it would not be the most dignifieddignified mode of action that could be adopted.

7. Her Majesty's Government may rest assured that I will act with all discretion and forbearance to prevent a collision, but the danger is imminent, and we know not at what moment a collision may be forced upon us. One Hundred and fifty additional United States Troops were landed upon San Juan the day before yesterday, and it is confidently rumoured that Five hundred more are on their way thither from the Columbia River.

I8. I would observe that but a few days prior to the occupation of San Juan, General Harney, who had been on a tour of inspection in Puget Sound, visited Victoria, and waited upon me. He made no complaint to me of the treatment of any American Citizens with the "insults and indignities" which he now asserts, and yet at that time he must, I should think, have been in full possession of all the points of the fancied grievance as he now gives it, for he had landed upon San Juan just before, and, doubtless, was in communication with the American Citizens there, and his silence, although not inexplicable, is significant, when viewed in connection with the general order issued on the Island by Captain Pickett (Enclosure No 7 in Despatch No 31) and with the different complexion which the whole matter now bears.

9. I have not yet replied to General Harney's Despatch, but I propose to do so to the effect that, having clearly stated the reasons which led to his ordering a military occupation of the Island, and as such reasons do not exist, there can be no necessity for a continuancecontinuance of such occupation, & I shall, therefore, beg him to withdraw the Troops now upon San Juan.

I have etc.
William S. Harney to Douglas, 6 August 1859, explaining his reasons for ordering the occupation of San Juan, as per despatch.
Draft, Merivale to E. Hammond, Foreign Office, 27 September 1859, forwarding copies of Douglas's despatches No. 33 and No. 34.
For signature by D. of Newcastle's [instructions?]. HM