<persName ref="prs:douglas_j"><surname>Douglas</surname>, <forename>James</forename></persName> to <persName ref="prs:newcastle"><surname>Pelham-Clinton</surname>, <forename>Henry</forename> <forename>Pelham</forename> <forename>Fiennes</forename></persName> 23 August 1862, CO 305:19, no. 9897, 244. Douglas addressee Newcastle

Published by Jim Hendrickson and the University of Victoria.

Douglas, James to Pelham-Clinton, Henry Pelham Fiennes 23 August 1862, CO 305:19, no. 9897, 244.The Colonial Despatches of Vancouver Island and British Columbia 1846-1871, Edition 2.6, ed. James Hendrickson and the Colonial Despatches project. Victoria, B.C.: University of Victoria. https://bcgenesis.uvic.ca/V62044.html. CO 305:19 CO 305 19 9897 244 44 V.I. 1862 received 10 October co_305_19_00245r.jpg Transcribed from microfilm archives, marked up in Waterloo Script, then transformed into TEI P5 XML.

The project glossary items have xml:id attributes beginning with trm_, and we use a trm: prefix to refer to them when linking from term elements.

We link to orgs in orgs/organizations.xml using the org: prefix.

We link to places in places.xml using the plc: prefix.

We link to people in bios/*.xml using the prs: prefix.

We link to vessels in vessels/*.xml using the vsl: prefix.

We link to other documents in the collection using the cdc: prefix.

The cdt (ColDesp Document Type) prefix used on catRef/target points to a central taxonomy in the includes file.

We link to other documents in the collection using the cdc: prefix.

Despatch to London. Minutes (1).

Douglas writes Newcastle in response to Langford's complaints. He defends the appointment of Cameron as Chief Justice of Vancouver's Island, claiming that he is much respected throughout the Colony, and points out that Langford's allegations of misconduct against Pemberton were found to be untrue.

Douglas, James Pelham-Clinton, Henry Pelham Fiennes Inserted revisionDesc. Added abstract.
No. 44 9897, CO 305/19, p. 244; received 10 October 23 August 1862

I have the honor to acknowledge receipt of Your Grace's Despatch No 101 of the 2nd June last, referring for report copy of letters from Mr E.E. Langford, formerly a resident of Vancouver's Island, containing complaints against certain of the Officersconnected connected with my Government; & I have also the honor to acknowledge receipt of Your Grace's Despatch No 106, of the 19th June, transmitting, for the same purpose, copy of a further letter of complaint from Mr Langford upon the same subject.

2. I have in accordance with Your Graces instructions called upon the officers concerned for any remarks they may have to offer in respect of the allegations of Mr Langford, and so soon as I receive their replies I will forward them to Your Grace with such report thereon as the circumstances of the case may require. MrBegbie Begbie, the Judge of British Columbia, one of the gentlemen inculpated by Mr Langford, is absent on Circuit, and by last Accounts was at Carribou, it may therefore be some time before I can hear from him.

3. With respect to the latter portion of your Despatch of the 2nd June, which refers especially to Mr Cameron the Chief Justice of Vancouver's Island, I will take an early opportunity of placing before Your Grace all the circumstances in connection with the appointment of MrCameron Cameron. I may however at present maintain that so far as I am aware Mr Cameron performs his duties with much ability, and his decisions give general satisfaction. Individually I believe him to be much respected throughout the Colony. The allegations of Mr Langford in regard to the administration of justice in Vancouver's Island I have no hesitation in at once pronouncing to be unfounded. I hear for the first time that "the proceedings in the Law Courts of the Colony are the theme ofscorn scorn and derision amongst the Colonists." Had such a state of things existed I must have known it; and I think I should, in such case, long ago have put an end to it. I did indeed once receive a letter of complaint against Mr Cameron from Mr Langford, and in that he asserted that "Life and Liberty had been illegally sacrificed and jeopardized and the ends of Justice defeated"—but as the allegation was merely a general one, and as I found on inquiry that just at that time Mr Langford had beenvery very properly committed by Mr Cameron for a gross contempt of Court, the cause of this letter as well as its object was so evident, that—anxious as I may be that no just complaint should go unnoticed—I yet felt that in this case it would be most inexpedient for me to interfere.

4. Mr Langford is the same person who brought the complaint against Mr Pemberton the Colonial Surveyor General, for unjust, partial, and improper conduct in respect of the sale of some Land, which complaint I forwarded to your Grace in my DespatchNo No 14 of the 23rd March 1860. Mr Pemberton was fully exonerated from the charge as will be seen by the Secretary of State's Despatch No 28 of the 26th July 1860. I would respectfully request your Grace's attention to both these Despatches, as serving to give some insight into Mr Langford's character, and to throw some light upon his present proceedings.

I have the honor to be My Lord Duke Your Grace's most obedient and humble Servant James Douglas
Mr Elliot Await further report &c. ABd 10 Octr TFE 10 Octr N 11