The Admiralty, accordingly, sent the "
Tribune" from China.
Sir E. Lyttons object was doubtless to ensure the presence
in the neighbourhood of
B. Columbia of a Military Force sufficient to
repress any disturbance
in the Colony.
The "
Tribune" arrived in
February 1859 and the Supernumerary
Marines were landed at
Esquimalt. In
April, the Governor reported
that because it was undesirable to keep the men unemployed in
VanC.
Island and because that they had volunteered for service in
British
Columbia, and had been actually promised the same benefits they had
enjoyed in China, together with a free grant of land at the end of 6
years service, he had sent them up to
New Westminster and given them
extra pay. It does not seem that
Governor Douglas felt himself compelled
by the "promise" to do this but that he pleads it as an apology
for thus employing the Marines without instructions.
It now appears from the letters
from the War Office and Admiralty
that no such promise to the Marines was authorized by H.M's
Govt or by the Admiral on the China Station.
Under these circes, I would suggest that
Governor Douglas should be informed of the object for
which the Marines were sent to
VanCouver's Island, that
regret should be expressed that he had taken a step
without instructions involving so heavy an expense,
and that he should be instructed at once to discontinue
the employment of the Marines in
B. Columbia—Adding
that the Admiralty have been apprized that in the
present state of affairs, the Supernumerary Marines
may be withdrawn from the Station. He should also be
requested to explain the circes of the
alleged promise and informed that it was unauthorized.
The Admiralty should be told that this explanation
has been called for and that the Governor will be
instructed to discontinue employing the Marines in
B.
Columbia—referring at the same time to the decision
communicated to the Admiralty on
11 August that the
Supernumeraries may be withdrawn.
Send copy of the Ady letter 8786 & of our answer to the War
Dept with reference to our letters of 9 July & 13 Augt.
The expenditure that has thus been occasioned, and
for which Bills are now being drawn by the Governor
on the Treasury, must be, I suppose, borne by the Colony.
The Governor scarcely seems to have been in fault in
this matter; he could hardly have done otherwise then rely
on the very positive & circumstantial assertions of
Captain Magin. (See last Enclosure.) It is now clear
that both the Admiralty & the War Dep
t, and their
officers, repudiate altogether
those assertions. That
officer is surely the person who ought to be brought to book.
I think therefore that (in addition to the
steps proposed by
Mr Irving, in which I agree) this
circumstance should be strongly noticed to the War Dep
t
who will themselves take such notice of
Capt. Maginn's
proceeding as they may think proper.