No. 89
26 October 1860
My Lord Duke,
I have the honor to acknowledge the receipt of your Grace's
Despatch No 33 of the
15th June forwarding a letter from the
Deputy Governor of the Hudson Bay Co
complaining
complaining of the operation
of the Customs Laws of
British Columbia upon the interests of
that Company.
2. Your Grace has taken so clear and just a view of the case
that it is scarcely necessary for me to enter into the merits of
the general question, but to prove to your Grace the futility of
the complaint, and to exhibit the general
working
working of the Customs
Laws in
British Columbia with regard to the business of the
Hudson Bay Co, I forward herewith a very clear and able Report
from
Mr Hamley the Collector of Customs, accompanied by
correspondence from the Officers of the Company at
Victoria,
by which it will be seen, that not only has it been the practice
to allow a drawback on the goods sent into the
Russian Territory,
but that in a recent
case
case where goods were forwarded by the
Company in transit through
British Columbia to
Colville in the
American Territory, no duty whatever was either levied or paid.
Although the Directors of the Company in England could not at
the date of their letter be aware of the latter transaction,
yet it appears somewhat
remarkable
remarkable, that the data before them
from which they reviewed the case, should not have supplied so
important an item of information as the former.
3. With regard to the alleged "exaction" of Customs duties
at
Victoria, your Grace has already pointed out to the Company
that the law is optional on vessels going North of
Frasers
River
to
to pay duty at
Fort Victoria or
New Westminster, and that this
provision must be intended as a convenience rather than a
restriction. As
Mr Hamley remarks
It was expressly to save the Company's servants the trouble and delay of
coming to
New Westminster that permission was given to
them
them to pay
their duties at
Fort Victoria from which Port the Vessel sails.
An objection on their part to this arrangement is simply
absurd, but if from any unaccountable reason they prefer it,
they are at all times at liberty to bring their vessels to
New Westminster for clearance and the payment of duties.
No overt complaints have ever been made by the Company's
Officers
Officers on the spot regarding this convenience, and I need
scarcely say they do not avail themselves of the option of
clearing at
New Westminster, although since the removal of
the Treasury to that place, the duties in such cases have
been paid to the Collector of Customs at
New Westminster—the
Vessel
Vessel meanwhile clearing from
Fort Victoria as heretofore.
Minutes by CO staff
Mr Elliot
I presume that a Copy of this Despatch should be communicated
to the Hudson's Bay Company with reference to the letter addressed
to them on the
13 of June? See drafts attached to 4963.
This shd go to the H.B.Co. as the result of the reference to the Govr wh. they were informed in the letter of the 13th June wd. be made.
It is a complete answer.
Mr Berens called upon me a few days ago & renewed this complaint
with other new ones. He is to put them on paper. I hope he will admit that
this complaint at least is fairly answered.
Documents enclosed with the main document (not transcribed)
Wymond Hamley, Collector of Customs, to Colonial
Secretary,
28 August 1860, responding to the complaint of the Hudson's Bay Company against customs procedures
in the colony.
Other documents included in the file
Draft, Colonial Office to Hudson's Bay Company,
31 December 1860, forwarding copy of
Hamley's report.