No. 21
21 April 1863
I have the honor to acknowledge Your Grace's Despatch
N
o 10 of the
10th of February last, transmitting for my
report, a letter from
Mr Charles Walkem respecting his sons
claim to be admitted to
the the Bar of
British Columbia, and
complaining that the presiding Judge (
Mr Begbie) had
refused to admit him to plead in the Supreme Court of the
Colony because he had not previously passed the Bar in England.
2. I beg in explanation to observe that on
Mr Justice
Begbie's first arrival in the Colony he adopted mutatis mutandis,
the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Civil Court
of
Vancouvers Island framed by
Mr Justice Cameronstrictly strictly
in accordance with the Order in Council, constituting that
Court; from a conviction the former then entertained, that a
similar practice prevailed in Her Majesty's other Colonies,
and that it would not be proper for him to depart from an
established precedent.
3. By that Order in Council no one could be admitted to
practice in the Supreme Court of
Vancouver Island, excepting
Barristers and Attorneys from England, Ireland
and and Scotland.
When the Court of
British Columbia was constituted the
practitioners of the Court of
Vancouver Island were admitted
to practice there also, and have since availed themselves of
that privilege on behalf of any Clients, who retained their
services.
4. This state of things has continued until lately,
without any complaint on the part of the public; but I see
no reason why Colonial
Barristers Barristers or Attorneys, provided
they be of good character, and properly instructed in English
Law, should be excluded from practising in the Courts of
British Columbia, and I have therefore called
Mr Justice
Begbie's attention to the propriety of making such amendments
in the Rules of his Court, as may render such persons eligible
for admission, and I have no doubt that
Mr Walkem on producing
satisfactory credentials
will will be admitted to practice as soon
as such rules are framed.
I have the honor to be
My Lord Duke
Your Grace's most obedient
Humble Servant
James Douglas
Minutes by CO staff
Sir F. Rogers
To my mind this is not quite a sufficient or satisfactory
answer on behalf of
Judge Begbie for his preference of United
States over Colonial Barristers practising in the Supreme Court
of
B. Columbia.
It has not reached us officially but I believe there is no
doubt of the fact that certain Barristers of
V.C.I. who practised
before
Judge Begbie have refused to plead before him any more.
Inform
Mr Walkem through the Gov. Gen. of Canada that the propriety
of admitting Canadian barristers to practice in
B. Columbia has
been pointed out to
Mr Justice Begbie and that rules have probably
been made upon this date authorizing such admission.
And inform
Gov. D. that this has been done.
Other documents included in the file
Draft reply,
Newcastle to
Monck, Canada, No. 66,
27 June 1863, which informs
Monck that
Douglas has intimated to
Begbie "the propriety of admitting Canadian Barristers to practice in
British Columbia" and that measures to change the rules are likely already in place.
People in this document
Begbie, Matthew Baillie
Blackwood, Arthur Johnstone
Cameron, David
Douglas, Sir James
Fortescue, 1st Baron Carlingford Chichester
Monck, 4th Viscount Monck Charles
Pelham-Clinton, 5th Duke of Newcastle Henry Pelham Fiennes
Rogers, Baron Blachford Frederic
Walkem, Charles
Walkem, George Anthony
Places in this document
British Columbia
Vancouver Island