Murdoch to Elliot (Assistant Under-Secretary)
               
            
            
               
               
                     Emigration Board
                     
                  
               28th July 1866
               
               Sir
                
            
            
               I have to acknowledge your letter of 
23rd inst, with
               a letter from the Under Secretary of State for the War
               Department, on the subject of the claim of the discharged
               Soldiers of the Royal Engineers in 
B. Columbia to grants of Land.
               
 
            
            
               2.  It appears that when the men of the Royal Engineers
               were sent to 
B. Columbia in 
1858, they were promised "grants
               of Agricultural Land not exceeding 30 Acres each after
               6 years continuous good faithful service in 
British Columbia, on

               condition of residence & Military Service in the Colony if
               called upon."  Seven of these men were discharged in 
1865,
               and they complain that they have not obtained the 30 Acres
               of Land "unconditionally promised" them—and they allege that
               "not a man was aware on volunteering for the Colony that the
               acceptance of such land would be coupled with the condition
               that he would render himself liable to be called on for
               Military duty".  They accordingly refuse the Land coupled
               with this condition.  They further represent that as the
               price of the Land at the time it was promised them was
               20
s/ an Acre, they are entitled to £30 worth of Land
               at its present price instead of 30 Acres.
               
 
            
            
            
               3.  This Memorial was transmitted by the Assist.
               Adjutant General of the Royal Engineers to 
GenlMoody
               who commanded the Engineers in 
British Columbia. He states
               in answer that the Petitioners "were aware of the conditions
               on which Land would be granted to them"—but he was not
               surprized at their refusing it on those conditions, as
               under the preemption Law any man may obtain 160 Acres of
               Land in any part of the Colony, without payment until the
               Survey comes up to him—which may not be in his lifetime.
               He adds that several of the Royal Engineers have obtained
               Land on those terms.
               
 
            
            
               4.  Under these circumstances, I do not see that anything
               can be

 done in regard to the Land claimed by these men.  As
               
Genl Moody went out in command of the R. Engineers at the
               first establishment of the Colony, and was in command till
               after the time of these men's discharge, he must be
               assumed to be conversant with all the circumstances connected
               with the original promise to them.  As they decline to accept
               the conditions attached to that promise Her Majesty's
               Government are of course relieved from the obligation to
               give it effect.  Nor is there any real hardship thereby
               inflicted on the men—considering the easy terms on which,
               as 
Genl Moody points out, they can become possessed of Land
               free from all

 condition in any part of the Colony.
               
 
            
            
               5.  In respect to their claims of £30 worth of Land
               instead of 30 Acres—in the first place the highest price
               of Land in 
British Columbia was 10
s/ an Acre and secondly,
               the object was not to give them a marketable commodity of a
               certain value, but to attach them to the Colony by giving
               the means of Settling.  The extent of Land promised was not
               measured by its value to sell—but by its capacity to support
               the Settler.  It is clear that they have no claim on this ground.
               
 
            
            
            
               6.  I return the original papers which accompanied your letter.
               
            
            
               I have the honor to be,
               Sir
               Your obedient
               Humble Servant
               
T.W.C. Murdoch
               
                
            
            
            
            
               Minutes by CO staff
               
               
                  
                  Sir F. Rogers
                     Found a short letter to the W.O. upon this report rejecting the claim.
                     
 
                  
                  
                   
               
               
                
            
            
               Other documents included in the file
               
               
                  
                  
                     S. Walcott, 
R.J.S. Macdonald, Emigration Office, to 
Macdonald, 
18 August 1866, 
                     agreeing that land promised to the Royal Engineers was intended for
                     settlement and should be required to be brought under cultivation.
                     
 
                   
               
               
                  
                     
                     
                        Colonial Office to Under-Secretary of State for War, 
18 August 1866, stating that 
Carnarvon rejected the claim of the Royal
                        Engineers, with explanation.
                        
 
                      
                  
                  
                     Minutes by CO staff
                     
                     
                        
                        
                           N.B.  Before sending off the Letter ask the E.C. privately whether
                           the few words I have added are correct in fact.  They can hardly be
                           otherwise.