I very much incline
                     
not to take this opinion.  It does not
                     appear who raises the question, & I am wholly unable to conceive how any
                     person capable of understanding the meaning of words can raise such a
                     question.  Nothing can be plainer than the word of the Act—nothing
                     more reasonable than the meaning resulting from those words, and
                     nothing I think more certain than that the framers of the Act did in
                     fact mean neither more nor less than they said.  When matters are
                     really not capable of question I do not think that the Law office
                     
shd be worried with questions about them to satisfy what is
                     mere idle cavilling.  I 
shd be disposed to write a very decided
                     answer—treating the matter

 as much too clear, to render it
                     proper that the Law Off
rs shd be troubled with it.
                     The word "
maximum" if nothing else is conclusive against
                     these loose inferences.