I very much incline
not to take this opinion. It does not
appear who raises the question, & I am wholly unable to conceive how any
person capable of understanding the meaning of words can raise such a
question. Nothing can be plainer than the word of the Act—nothing
more reasonable than the meaning resulting from those words, and
nothing I think more certain than that the framers of the Act did in
fact mean neither more nor less than they said. When matters are
really not capable of question I do not think that the Law office
shd be worried with questions about them to satisfy what is
mere idle cavilling. I
shd be disposed to write a very decided
answer—treating the matter
as much too clear, to render it
proper that the Law Off
rs shd be troubled with it.
The word "
maximum" if nothing else is conclusive against
these loose inferences.