In
Nov 1862 she wrote saying that her husband who had left her &
emigrated to
B. Columbia had promised to remit to her 1/2 his
Salary—but had
failed to do so. Her appeal was sent to the
Govr
who was instructed to inform
Mr Cox that unless he could refute
the statement that he had left his wife without means of assistance
he must either provide for his Wife out of his Salary or be removed
from his app
t.
The
Govr was again written to on the
7 July 1863 no report
having been
recd & he was told "you will see that
Mr Cox does
not trifle with this matter," & will inform
Mr Cox that
unless he made his remittances punctually he was to be dismissed.
In answer the
Govr stated that
Mr Cox had already made
remittances to his Wife & that in justice to
Mr Cox he must say he
had always found him a correct, honorable & useful officer.
On the
4 Dec 1863 a further despatch reported that
Mr Cox had
stated that he was prepared to allow his Wife £60 a year & had
already made some remittances to her on that account.
Mrs Cox now states that she has only
recd £14.15.9 this
year.
As
Mr Cox has since
1863 apparently regularly made his
promised remittances, & possibly he is one of those unfortunate
officers who are in arrear of Salary, I think it
wd be sufficient
to send a copy of the present appeal to the
Govr to be sent to
Mr Cox?