Sir F. Rogers
This is a somewhat embarrassing case owing to the gross
irregularities with which these sales have been conducted.
Perhaps this Ordinance—which avoids all sales & provides for the
repayment of the purchase money with interest—is the best way
out of the difficulty—But it seems rather hard upon owners of
land which has been wrongfully sold—Either because no taxes
were in fact due, or because no attempt to levy by distress was
made under sec 22 of the Act of 1860—that the amount repaid in
respect of purchase money & interest should be made a charge
on the Estate, & be recoverable by distress.
This is the more hard, because purchasers are fully compensated,
& yet from the Report it appears
that there was only one case in
which the purchaser had entered into possession or had done any
act which a prudent man would have done when becoming possessed
of property.
Again by the Acts of 60 & 62 the owner of land had the right to
redeem the land sold by paymt of the taxes & 20 per Cent
thereon within a year. But it is clear from the Report that in
some cases the land was sold without the knowledge of the owner,
& without notice to him; so that he had no opportunity within
the year of redeeming, or proving that he had paid the taxes.
I should be disposed to send this Act & the prior papers to the
Land Board for a report, but if this should not be thought a
proper case for them I would point out the above objections to
the Governor & delay sanction.