Sir F. Rogers
Governor Seymour sends home the result of a "Convention of
Delegates" held at
Yale in Sept. called together by the
Confederation League to accelerate the admission of
B. Columbia
into the Dominion of Canada.
The 4 topics to which the Resolutions refer are:
1. Confederation
2. Responsible Govt
3. Retrenchment
4. Trade reciprocity with the U. States.
1.
Confederation.
It has already been the subject of correspondence, & I would
refer you to your minute
on on 10906/67 (with 538)
"it seems to me quite impossible to think of this question till
the H.B.C
os Territory is in possession of Canada—nor until
the two Colonies
B. Columbia & Canada have so extended
themselves as to warrant Expenditure in roads &c." The
originators of the Resolutions appear quite able to take care of
themselves in these terms—see Resol: 3 page 4.
2. Responsible Govt. See your minute on 6951.
One Chamber called the Legislative Assembly. Executive Council
holding office while commanding confidence of Assembly—nominative
Council unsuited—people no Constitutional power &c.
3. Retrenchment. Reduction of Salaries from the Govr
downwards & amalgamation of Offices.
4. Reciprocity.
In 538 the
Govr reports that the question will shortly come
before the Legislative Council. The question has already been
mooted by the H.B.C
o &
Mr Sproat & others—see papers with 538.
From Resolution 37 it appears there is to be an Address to
the
Queen, to the
Govt of Canada & Petitions to the two Houses of
Parliament.
The Govr also sends two notices "respectably signed"
protesting agst the Resolutions.
It remains to be seen what line the new Council take.
A copy of the dispatch, not the printed Resolutions, should be
sent I suppose to
Sir John Young.
Yes. And parag. 6 of the dph to F.O.
And it is matter for consideration whether
Lord Granville is
prepared
to give
Govr Seymour any guide as to Responsible
Govt or Representative Institutions—in regard to which
Govr Seymour says he has "not yet been able to see a clear
path before him."
The last Council consisted of 5 officials, 9 members nominated
by the Govr & 9 appointed by the Govr on the "recommendation of
the People".
I. It seems to me questionable whether
V.C.I. can be
conveniently governed from
Ottawa. But if the parties concerned
think it can, it is certainly not for the British
Govt (I
shd say) to stand in their way. Our policy, I should say,
was to assist everything
wh tends to make Union practicable,
but to discourage that premature & impatient action
wh
defeats its own object so far as we can with
t appearing to
resist that
wh (I presume) we really wish to see effected.
The present state of the negotiations with the HBC
wh renders
it for the moment absurd to talk of Union bet
n Canada &
B.C.
is both a real & a producible reason for not entertaining
the question now. And I
wd so use it.
II. As to representative institutions & responsible
Govt the objections are
1. that formally repres
ve institutions did not answer very
well in
V.C. Island.
2. that they will almost certainly hasten the course of
Anglo-Saxon violence ending in destruction of aborigines. For
the purpose of keeping the peace in this respect the American
character of the population renders the maintenance of an
Executive responsible to an external authority peculiarly necessary.
3. There is great practical difficulty in either providing for
the representation of aliens & miners (who form a large part of
the population) or in leaving them unrepresented. A mining
district is crowded one year & deserted the next.
4. There is practical representation already.
Public
meetings recommend to the
Govr certain Members of the
Council & the
Govr thereupon nominates.
5. The establishment of Respe Govt (at any rate) will not
tend towards Confederation.
6. And if Confederation is to be our end it is hardly worth
while setting up fresh institutions to be merely transitional.
7. That the most extraordinary catastrophes may be expected if
the Fenians of
B.C. in their present state of disorder are
handed over to such a
Govt or succession of Gov
ts as
wd arise out of such a Legislature as
wd first emerge on
giving to
B.C. such representative
institutions as the present
composition of its population renders possible.
In short I submit, that this Colony is not in a state to be
relieved from a certain steadying external pressure—& I do
not like to relieve it from the pressure of Downing Street till
we can substitute the pressure of
Ottawa. At any rate not till
it has recovered its balance after the shock of
Amalgamation—
wh has been considerable.
III. The memorialists go into detail on the subject of
financial Reform & this paper
shd therefore be seen by
Sir F.
Sandford.
IV. On reciprocity the F.O. will be consulted.
If these
Gentlemen were of more unquestionable importance, it m
t
possibly be desirable to answer them by more or less of a manifesto.
Stating the disposition of HMG with regard to Confederation &
Repe Instns (if not Responsible Govt) that
disposition not being eventually hostile—but expectant.
Also some general language respecting financial reform &
economy—also, (when we hear from the F.O.) notice of their
desire for a Reciprocity Treaty.
But there is so much probability that the "Convention" is mere
empty blast—that (the address being to the Governor not to
the Queen)—I
shd be rather inclined merely to acknowledge
the dph "enclosing an address (describing it) from certain
delegates and also enclosing what appear to be certain
advertisements signed by persons in
Victoria who declare that
these delgates have not in any way received authority to
represent their opinions or desires."