Mr Holland
I pass this thro' you that you may see what is said about Acts.
Hopeful as regards Finance—he says however "the Public Debt
has been considerably reduced yet larger sums have been
expended on public works of utility," no doubt necessary works
but nevertheless running the risk of causing a breach of faith
by not having remitted monies regularly
to pay the interest &
Sinking Fund on their Debentures.
Governor Seymour has no right to refer in such a document as
his Speech to the Legislature, to unofficial letters he has
recd
"shewing a desire on the part of HM's Govt &c."
And very questionable whether he should have given his opinion
that the people should be allowed to elect their Representatives
without having to obtain the concurrence of the
Govr in
their choice,
tho' it really is a very small matter—as the
Govr almost as a matter of course approves of the elected
man, & even takes the 1 named if more than one is put to him.
Sir F. Sandford
You should see this, as it relates in a great measure to the
financial prospects of the Colony.
Noted.
No doubt it would be a good thing for the Colony if one of the 2
Chief Justices could be removed by promotion to some other
Colony, so that the 2 Supreme Courts of
V. Island &
B. Columbia
might be united under one Chief Justice & one Puisne Judge.
I should write first that
Ld G. was glad to learn from
Mr S's. speech that the finances of
B.C. were in process
of recovery.
I would observe that
Ld G. is not aware what are the
unofficial letters to
wh he refers as conveying to him the
opinion of HMG respecting the Union of HM's possessions in
BNA but
wd point out that such communication ought not
to be made the basis of a formal announcement to the Leg
re
or community of
B.C.
With regard to the proposal to give formally as well as
virtually representative institutions (the Leg
e Council
is at present entirely nominal but the
Govr always in fact names
a certain number of persons who are practically elected in
different districts of the Colony). I would point out to the
Govr, that it is more than doubtful both whether the
Leg
e Council of
B. Columbia are legally competent to
alter their own constitution & whether they are a fitting
body to be intrusted with that power. But that if the
difficulties which
have hitherto prevented the formal
establishment of representative institutions are in process of
wearing out,
Ld G. will readily consider any detailed
scheme which in
Mr Seymours opinion will provide for the
adequate representation of the population & for the efficient
Govt of the Country.
And I would observe that the three difficulties
wh appear
to be met arise 1. from the migratory & scattered character
of the population. 2. from the large proportion of aliens or
visitors
wh exists in it & 3. from the presence of the Indians
whom it is difficult to govern & protect without a
settled and understood
policy and a strong Executive power.
(I do not trouble you with the legal reasons for doubting
whether the
B.C. Leg
re can alter its own constitution.
But they
shd be explained to the
Govr in the dph.)
I am somewhat afraid of instituting responsible
Govt
(
wh will follow at no distant date in the [creation?]
of a Council & Assembly) in
B.C. before it gets attached to Canada.
I
shd fear an Indian War before long.