No. 31
27th November 1869
My Lord,
I think it my duty to report to Your Lordship the anomalous
position in which I found the office of Treasurer in this
Government on my arrival in the Colony.
2. It is the principal department of Revenue,
Expenditure Expenditure, and
Public Accounts, and yet has been allowed to remain for nearly
three years without any recognized head—left to the
administration of a clerk who has given no security for the safe
custody of the Public monies.
3. In
Mr Seymour's Despatch N
o 58 of the
6th April, 1867,
he has mentioned his recommendation which was subsequently acted
upon, that
Mr Franks, then
Treasurer Treasurer of the Continental portion
of the Colony, should be relieved from his duties, and his
further suggestion that
Mr Watson, late incumbent of the office
of Treasurer of
Vancouver Island, which
Mr Seymour treated as
having been abolished, should be appointed Treasurer of the
United Colony.
4. In the same Despatch
Mr Seymour stated however that he
found
the the financial embar[r]assment much greater than he
anticipated, and also that what he mentioned as the light duties
of the office of Treasurer could be performed without much
trouble or increase of pay by the Collector of Customs.
5. I now find that this arrangement was never carried out,
although
Mr Watson was removed from the office of Treasurer,
and
and that, as I have stated, the Department has remained merely
in charge of the Chief Clerk, who has given no security and has
required the assistance of two subordinates in the discharge of
his duties. While in effect there is no responsible official to
whom the Governor can look for assistance in the adjustment and
administration of the
financial financial arrangements of the Colony.
6. I have no doubt that the amalgamation of the Customs and
Treasury into one Revenue Department under the Collector of
Customs, or any other Officer who might be selected as Receiver
General, would have been a most desirable arrangement, though my
own experience does not teach me that the duties of the office
of
of Treasurer and Public Accountant in any Colony are so light as
to be performed without trouble or increase of expense in
another department. But such a reorganization of these public
departments, which would have been easy and most desirable two
years and a half ago is not now to be so readily accomplished,
nor is it now free from objection. In view of the Union of this
Colony with
the the Dominion of Canada it would be profitless to
consolidate offices which would have to be again disunited, as
the Customs would be a Department of the federal Government and
the local administration would require a Treasury of its own.
On the other hand, having regard to the necessity which exists
for economy in the management of the finances, and to
the the
fact that for nearly three years the office, though not the
duties, has been practically abolished I am not at present
prepared to recommend the appointment of a Treasurer. Yet it is
obviously improper on general principles that the public should
be without security for the safe custody of the public monies,
while at the same time it would be hard upon
Mr Graham, the
Clerk
in in charge after being allowed to remain so for more than
two years and a half without any objection on this score, to be
required now without further remuneration to give security which
would probably entail upon him some expense.
7. I admit that under the complicated circumstances which I
have brought to Your Lordships notice, I am disinclined for the
present
to to attempt any alteration of existing arrangements from
which no absolute evil has yet arisen, but I feel them to be so
irregular that I could not allow them to continue without
acquainting Your Lordship with the state of affairs and my
reasons for not immediately taking some steps in the matter, in
order that Your Lordship may be able to furnish me with any
instructions that
you you may think expedient under the
circumstances.
I have the honor to be,
My Lord,
Your most obedient
humble Servant
A. Musgrave
Minutes by CO staff
Sir F. Sandford
I conclude that the Chief Clerk only draws Salary as such tho'
performing the duties of Treasurer, which ought not to be. In
the
B. Columbia Civil List Act (N
o 62 of
1863)
there is a Salary of £500 a year
for the Treasurer but in the Estimates for
1869 I see that a
Treasurer, is not even included by name.
It appears to me quite a question whether the Chief Clerk ought
not to have half the Salary
assigned to the Treasurer as long as
he acts—but he ought not to be allowed to continue acting
without giving security.
We have had practical proof in the past year—within which
the Colony has paid up a large arrear of debt—that the
Finance department is being efficiently managed. I think that
Mr Graham may [be] left as he is, therefore, for the present,
but he ought certainly to be called upon to give Security.
This will entail expense before him, and I think the Governor
s
d be authorized to raise his Salary to £500 (or whatever
sum short of that he may on enquiry think sufficient).
Other documents included in the file