No. 117
25th August 1870
My Lord,
I have had the honor to receive Your Lordship's Circular
Despatch of the
27th June conveying the suggestion of the Lords
Commissioners of the Admiralty that measures should be taken for
checking desertions from the Royal Navy, as well by the adoption
of
of the means resorted to in New Zealand, therein mentioned, as
by putting in force the statutory penalty for the offence of
procuring or assisting Desertions under Section 25 of the Act 29
and 30
Vic. C. 109.
2. On reference to the Attorney General upon this subject, I
find that convictions for inducing Seamen to desert from Her
Majesty's Navy, have been had here under 37 Geo III
Chap. 70. sec. 1 which makes the offence a felony and punishable
with Penal servitude for life or imprisonment for not more
than than
three years with or without hard labor; and it is presumed that
this Statute will still be held to be in force here.
3. The Statute 29 & 30
Vic Chap. 109, Secs. 25 & 26 referred to
in Your Lordship's Despatch provides for a summary conviction,
with a fine not exceeding £30 and £20, respectively, but this
has been found so utterly indequate for the purpose intended,
that all cases of assisting or persuading seamen in Her
Majesty's Navy to desert are now sent up to the Assizes for
trial under the before mentioned Statute of
37 Geo 37 Geo. III. Chap.
70.
4. It is believed that the Senior Naval Officer on this Station
gives rewards for the apprehension of Deserters, and I apprehend
that if the local Government were to do so instead of the Naval
authorities convictions would not be any more frequent than they
are now.
I have the honor to be,
My Lord,
Your most obedient
humble Servant
A. Musgrave
Minutes by CO staff
Naval Deserters.
The Statute recommended for adoption has been tried in
BC
and found utterly inadequate to prevent Desertions from the
Royal Navy. The Law in force in the Colony is much more severe
& makes the offence of inducing Seamen to desert a felony
punishable with penal Servitude for life or imprisonment for not
more than 3 years.
State to the Adm
y how the Matter stands adding that as in the
case of
Prince Edwards Is Ld Kimberley, if their L
dships
concur, proposes to inform the
Govr of
B.C. that the provisions
of the old act are sufficient.
I wd first send copy to Admy.
Send in L[ithographed] F[orm] for conson & with reference to
Adm
y letter.
Documents enclosed with the main document (not transcribed)
Printed circular as per despatch, No. 2, 27 June 1870.