No. 6
9th February 1871
My Lord,
Referring to my Despatch N
o 147 of the
17th November last, I
have the honor to forward to Your Lordship a copy of correspondence
which has passed between
Lord Lisgar and myself upon
the the subject of
ensuring pensions to the Officers now in the service of
British
Columbia who will be affected by the Union of this Colony with
the Dominion.
2. I think it right that provision for these pensions should be
clearly made by Act of Parliament of the Dominion, and I have
little doubt that Your Lordship
will will take the view of the matter
which I have expressed in this correspondence. If any of the
Officers to whom the arrangement applies should accept other
Office from the Imperial Government, or the Government of
Canada, the pension may be suspended during the time he may hold
such appointment; but I think that the right to elect
whether whether he
will take such other office should rest with him.
3. The Report of the Privy Council of Canada of the
7th
January forwarded to me in
Lord Lisgar's Despatch of
9th
January contains a provision that in consideration of the loss
and inconvenience I shall be subjected to by the termination
of my employment here upon the
Union Union of this Colony with Canada,
half a year's Salary shall be paid to me. I should observe that
I did not make any official application for such an allowance.
In a private Note to a leading member of the Canadian
administration I had alluded to the prejudicial effect upon my
own position which would be produced by
the the Union. I mentioned
that although I confidently hoped for an appointment from Your
Lordship to other employment elsewhere I yet might be some time
without such occupation. And I asked whether he thought that it
would be unfair to request that I should be placed in the same
position as if I had obtained a year's leave of
absence absence from my
government, in which case I should be allowed to draw half my
Salary for that time. The provision in the Minute of Council
has I believe originated in what thus passed in private
correspondence without any formal request.
4. I trust that Your Lordship will not regard this provision as
objectionable. I
have have some confidence that you will look upon
the special circumstances of the termination of my service here
as giving me a claim for other employment; but some time may
elapse before any suitable vacancy occurs; during which period
without this moderate provision from the Canadian Government I
should suffer
serious serious loss and inconvenience from the effect of
a measure, which I know has been brought to a successful issue
mainly through my personal exertions.
I have the honor to be,
My Lord,
Your most obedient
Humble Servant
A. Musgrave
Minutes by CO staff
I think it is clear that there will be no hitch as regards
provision for the displaced Columbian Public
Officers—especially if
Mr Hankin the Col.
Secy, &
Mr
Phillippo the Attorney General are provided for elsewhere.
You will find the Address to
the Queen in 2349.
Sir F. Rogers
I do not quite understand why
Mr Philippo should lose his
place. Surely
B Columbia when a province of the Dominion will
want an Attorney General; & £800 is not a very high price for a
good lawyer.
They will have responsible Local Govt and the Col. Secy and
Atty Genl will be removable officers.
The only question, I think, is whether
Mr Musgrave should be
allowed to accept this 1/2 year's salary. I should be disposed
to allow it. It is not contrary to regulation, and I
do not see that the precedent is likely to lead to inconvenience
the case being so much
sui generis.
I
shd not at present express any opinion ab
t the claims of the
officers, ab
t wh Ld K may have to give judgment [knegth?]
Ackn. and sanction the receipt by
Gov M of the 1/2 years Salary.
I agree. 1/2 years salary is not by any means too large a
reward for the service
Mr M. has rendered, & it is to be hoped
that these services may again be made use of before long.
See from Canada—Gov. 96, 4556 April 27, 1871.
Documents enclosed with the main document (not transcribed)
Musgrave to
Lisgar, Canada,
22 November 1870, respecting provisions
to be made for the reemployment or pensioning of certain public
officers upon confederation.
Lisgar to
Musgrave,
9 January 1871, enclosing an approved minute
by the Executive Council on the subject.
"Copy of a Report of a Committee of the Honorable the Privy
Council approved by His Excellency the Governor General in
Council on the
7th January, 1871," ensuring
pensions or employment to the officers in question, certified by
Wm. H. Lee, Clerk, Privy Council of Canada.
Musgrave to
Lisgar,
9 February 1871, expressing concern that the
provisions suggested were not sufficiently explicit, and
forwarding a minute by the Executive Council on the subject.
"Extract from the minutes of the Executive Council of
February
6th 1871," signed by
Philip J. Hankin, Clerk of the Council.
Other documents included in the file
People in this document
Blake, Ernest Edward
Cox, Charles
Dealtry, William
Hankin, Philip J.
Holland, Henry Thurston
Lee, Wm. H
Musgrave, Sir Anthony
Phillippo, George
Rogers, Baron Blachford Frederic
Trutch, Sir Joseph William
Victoria, Queen Alexandrina
Wodehouse, First Earl of Kimberley John
Young, Sir John, Baron Lisgar,
Places in this document
British Columbia