That your memorialist is a British Subject, and resident
Colonist of this Island, employed in Commerical pursuits.
That on the
23d July Ulto the American Schooner
"William Allen," chartered, & consigned to your Memorialist by his
agents in
San Francisco, arrived at this Port of
Victoria.
That on the 24th of the same month, being the next day ensuing,
your Memorialist, having made the necessary entries at the Custom House,
did apply for a clearance for the said Schooner hence to ports on the
west coast of this Island.
That the Collector of Customs denied Compliance with the application
under the plea of the Schooner being a foreign bottom.
That your Memorialist, in answer to this objection, shewed, by
reference to the Custom House books, that the Honble Hudsons Bay Co
had been in the habit of employing foreign vessels on the Coast without
let or
hindrance on the part of the Custom House officials.
That the said foreign vessels so employed by the Hudsons Bay Co
had been regularly permitted to go Coasting.
That other vessels owned and employed by, and representing in toto
the interests of, nonresidents and foreigners had in no instance been
refused permission to take in cargoes at other ports on the Coast.
That foreign vessels, having been chartered in
San Francisco for
the use and benefit of the Hudson Bay Co had been allowed to proceed to
Beaver Harbor, on the North East Coast of this Island, which is no port
of Entry, to take in a Cargoe and return direct to their port of
departure without making any appearance at the Custom House of this
Colony, either on arriving at, or departing from the said Colony.
That the Collector of Customs still persisted in his refusal,
and also informed your memorialist that the vessel would be
liable to seizure should she proceed to any ports on the Coast.
Your memorialist then addressed a letter to this Officer on the
subject. Copies of this Communication and
of
Mr Sangsters reply are
annexed.
That in the reply an entirely new ground of refusal is urged,
viz. "because there are no settlements on the coast". In this averment
your memorialist most distinctly asserts that the Collector of Customs
is wrong. There are settlements on the Coast! Your memorialist has had
for nearly six months white men settled on the west coast collecting
native produce for exportation, which fact is notorious to the whole
Colony. Your memorialist being thus, as he most humbly conceives,
grievously and illegally hampered, and embarrassed, in the
peaceful prosecution of his business by the officer at the Head
of the Customs department of this Island, by and with the
consent, advice, and knowledge of the Head of the Executive, and
fearing a reiteration of similar, or equally pernicious (to
him), proceedings Most humbly lays his case before your Right
Honorable Self, and while averring to the truth of the foregoing
statement your memorialist most respectfully asserts
That he is entitled to the same rights and privileges of trade
in this Colony, as those enjoyed by the Hudsons Bay Co.
That any foreign vessel he may employ is, by the laws and usage of
commerce, entitled to proceed after discharging cargoe at one port of
this Colony, to other port or ports on the same coast to load for abroad.
That as he is, in the prosecution of his business, necessitated
to employ ships and land goods on the west coast of this Colony
his rights to proceed thither without interference after entering at the
Custom House of
Victoria is under the fact of no customs Establishment
existing at any of the ports on the said Coast being no fault of his, &
for which he in justice should not suffer.
And further that the Honorable Lessees of this Island in their
prospectus issued to the world (where, in publishing the Conditions of
the Lease) affirm, in the latter part of the sixth clause that
. . . all the ports and harbors shall be open and free to residents,
and to all nations either trading or seeking shelter therein.
Your Memorialist having full confidence in the justness of his
complaint, and in the
earnest desire of Her Majesty's Government
to foster the rising Commerce of a young Colony, and to check
any overstretch of authority on the part of the Local Executive,
lays his case before you with a confident assurance of ample protection.
And in conclusion your Memorialist most humbly prays, that, as
there is no law officer in the Colony to advise with in these
matters, such definite instructions may be addressed to the Head
of the Customs department of this Colony, as shall enable him to
act at all times, in all matters Connected with the Commerce of
this Island, in accordance with the laws of Great Britain.
And your memorialist
Documents enclosed with the main document (not transcribed)
Swanston to Collector of Customs, Port
Victoria,
24 July
1854, demanding the clearance denied earlier in the day.
James Sangster, Collector of Customs, to
Swanston,
24 July
1854, refusing to give clearance on the grounds that there were
no settlements at the destination ports.
Minutes by CO staff
Mr Merivale
We have no information on this subject beyond what these papers,
which have not been submitted to the Governor for report,
contain. I presume that we must return the lithographed ans
r.
I cannot but think that Governors do not sufficiently promulgate
our rules of correspondence with this Office, & that it would be
well if they were all told, in a circular, to occasionally
remind the public by a
Govt notice of the existence of the
rule, & the necessity for observing it.
Ack
e to the Governor. I suspect such ignorance as
Mr
Blackwood suggests is not very common.
Put by for the present. It is endorsed as a duplicate, the original
having been sent to
Gov Douglas on the day which this is dated. The
Notice of it must not be lost sight of. In a place like
Vancouvers Island it does not seem wise to throw Impediments in the way of trade
which the Authorities there would seem to have done in
Mr Swanston's
case.
If the original does not soon arrive this shd be forwarded to
the Govr.
Mr Merivale
No Report having up to this date been
recd the Gov
rs attention
should now I presume be called to the subject of this Mem
l.
Other documents included in the file
Documents enclosed with the main document (not transcribed)
Statement of
Edward E. Langford, J.P.,
18 April 1854,
certifying that the letter from
Golledge (above) was "a true & correct
copy" of the original.
People in this document
Blackwood, Arthur Johnstone
Douglas, Sir James
Golledge, Richard
Grey, Right Honorable, Second Baronet, Sir George
Jadis, Vane
Langford, Edward Edwards
Merivale, Herman
Peel, Sir Frederick
Sangster, James
Swanston, Robert S.
Vessels in this document
William Allen
Places in this document
Beaver Harbour
San Francisco
Vancouver Island
Victoria