With reference to
Mr Elliot's Letter of the
25th
Ult., enclosing copies of a Correspondence between the Colonial
Office and the War Department, upon the subject of the mode of
replacing the stores lost in the "
Briseis," which were intended
for the use of the Royal Engineer Force in
British Columbia, I
am directed by the Lords Commissioners of Her Majesty's Treasury
to request that you will state to
Sir E. Bulwer Lytton that My
Lords regret the expense and loss which has been incurred with
respect to the stores for
British Columbia, but They do not
consider
thatthat there are sufficient grounds for requiring the War
Department to defray this Expense, neither could the amount be
recovered from the Funds of the Colony.
It appears to My Lords that the only course will be to
provide for the cost of the stores lost, in the vote to be
submitted to Parliament, for
British Columbia, adding to the
Estimate an explanation of the cause of this charge upon Imperial Funds.
Minutes by CO staff
Lord Carnarvon
Now Instruct the War Office to replace, with as much
despatch as possible, the lost stores, including those
mentioned as "public" in the list accompanying 4081.
Request the War Office to understand, with reference to
the remark in
Sir B. Hawes' L
r of the 11 Ap
l that
this Office was not "fully aware" that it was not the
practice for the War Office to insure Military Stores
sent to the B. Colonies, until after the loss of the
Briseis had called attention to the point—add that
Sir E.
Lytton begs that every precaution may be taken on this
occasion for the safe arrival of the stores now ordered,
& state that
Sir Edd will further be glad to be
informed when they are despatched from this Country.
Mention to the War Office that the expense of replacing the
Stores will be borne on the
B. Columbia Estimate.
2. Inform the Governor that measures are being taken for
replacing the stores—with the exception of the Houses—the
Oats—& the hay.
I think that we have nothing more to do than to request
the War Office
toto furnish the required stores and to ask to
be informed when they are despatched from this Country.
The question who should pay for them is one on which
it is fit to acquiesce silently in the arbitration of the
Treasury, and it would be highly unbecoming and inconvenient
that the Department of one Secretary of State should address
the Department of another Secretary of State in terms of a
rebuke or of peremptory instruction as if they were conveying
orders to an inferior authority.
Yes—but I think that the W.O. sd be requested to
insure this fresh supply of stores.