Phillimore to Carnarvon
Doctors Commons
July 27th 1866
My Lord,
I am honoured with Your Lordship's commands as
signified in
Sir Frederic Rogers's letter of the
23rd
instant, stating that with reference to my letter of the
4th of October last on the subject of the Marriage Ordinance
passed by the Legislature of
British Columbia, he was
directed by Your Lordship to transmit to me a copy of a
Despatch which Your Lordship's Predecessor addressed to the
Governor of the Colony, together with a copy of
a a
Confidential Report of the local Attorney General on the
questions raised in that despatch. And
Sir Frederic Rogers
was to request that I would furnish Your Lordship with my
opinion whether the explanation afforded by the Attorney
General of
British Columbia removes any doubts I may have
entertained as to the propriety of submitting the
Ordinance for Her Majesty's confirmation.
In obedience to Your Lordship's commands, I have the
honour to Report,
That it appears from the opinion of the
Attorney General of
Columbia that the difficulty
which which I
had felt about the operation of this Act on the Indian
community has been generally considered by the Columbian
Authorities, and though the question raised in my former
report, as to the operation of the 17
th Section on
Indian Marriages, is not perhaps directly answered, I
think it does appear that the Act will be beneficial on the
whole to
Columbia, and that the special difficulty as to
the Indian Marriages cannot be immediately and completely
overcome by any legislation, while there is a reasonable
prospect that
eventually eventually such Marriages will be brought within
the reach of the provisions of this Act.
I have the honor to be,
My Lord,
Your Lordship's most obedient,
humble Servant,
Robert Phillimore
Minutes by CO staff
The
Queens advocate is satisfied—& I do not think any objection
is worth insisting upon—therefore I
wd sanction the Ord
ce.
There is a risk — as expressed in
Sir F. Rogers
previous min — in not requiring the registration of
places of worship where marriages may be solemnized that
there may be insufficient notice & record of the
ceremony. There is also I suppose under the
circumstances of
B. Columbia risk, in requiring too
much in respect of the licensing of such places, that
marriages will not be solemnized at all.
The Ordinance is clearly imperfect on this point &
I sd have been glad if some additional precaution
cd have been taken. But I suppose under the
difficulties of the case we must accept it as it stands.
Other documents included in the file
Draft reply,
Carnarvon to Officer Administering the Government,
No. 5,
15 August 1866, reporting the
the Queen is "graciously pleased" to "allow" an order titled "An ord
er resp
g Marriage in British Columbia."