Despatch to London.
Minutes (2), Enclosures (untranscribed) (1), Other documents (2), Marginalia (1).
No. 25
3rd March 1869
My Lord,
I have the honor to forward to Your Lordship Copy of a letter
addressed to me by the Attorney General, relating to the
proceedings which tookplace place in the Legislative Council on a
motion made by the Senior Member for the City of Victoria to
obtain the reduction of the Salaries of those Officers
guaranteed by "The Crown Officers Salaries Act 1863."
2. As, in the late Session, so in this, I directed the Officers
whose Salaries were under consideration to withdraw from the
Legislative Hall,until until the matter should have been disposed of,
one way or the other. Now, as in 1868, the Resolutions in favor
of reduction were thrown out, in their absence.
3. I have more than once expressed the opinion that the
Governor's Salary is somewhat high for the Colony to pay during
its present financial depression. But it is certainly nottoo too
high to cover the expenses of the Office I hold, nor to repay
the very arduous and responsible duties attached to it.
4. Even in the early days of the Colony, when its Revenue was
comparatively small and the social expenditure of the Public
Officers moderate, Sir James Douglas recommended that the Salary
attachedto to his office should not be less than five thousand
pounds a year.
I have the honor to be
My Lord,
Your Lordship's most obedient
humble Servant Frederick Seymour
Minutes by CO staff
Sir F. Sandford
The Council upheld vested interests, & threw out Motions for
reducing the Civil List Officers Salaries—none of the Officers
whose Salaries were affected voting.
As the question will probably come up again—I sd
acknowledge this despatch—but send a confidential despatch to
the Governor asking him to consider carefully and report,
as to the propriety either of abolishing, or of reducing the
Salaries of
future holders of the offices in question (in case the proposal
sd hereafter be carried in the Assembly.