M Elliot/
In these Despatches
Governor Blanshard raises objections to the
proceedings of the Company on two points—1 the locality of the Public Buildings, on which they had ordered a Sum of £4000 to
be
expended, and 2 the payment of Salaries by means of Taxes on "Imports or otherwise" instead of from
the proceeds of Land Sales.
On the first point the Governor
argues that to erect Public
Buildings at the Company's Trading Posts, surrounded by their own
Reserves, before a
This is objectionable especially as regards the possible future
surrender of the charter.
Site for a Town is even fixed upon, would be to
defeat in a great degree the object of the Grant, namely the
Colonization & Settlement of
the Island⎯
Sir John Pelly explains that the Sum so to be expended has been
reduced to £2000⎯ that the Buildings are to consist of a Moderate sized
Gov House, a Building for a Church, with Houses for a Chaplain & Schoolmaster. These
Buildings are to be maintained & the Salaries paid by "Taxes on Imports or otherwise."
Besides the promotion of the
Colonization & Settlement of
the Island, the Imperial
Gov have a further interest in these Buildings,
in so far that they have covenanted to reimburse the Company the value
of them, should the Crown resume possession of
the Island. It would therefore appear to be only proper that the
Secretary of State should have the opportunity of exercising some control (both as
to
the locality
and quality) over the construction of any Buildings of any extent which
the Company may contemplate ⎯
On the 2 point, the payment of Salaries, the Governor contends that by directing all Salaries
to be paid by means of Taxes the Company repudiate the Clause in their Grant which
binds them to provide at their own expense
allall necessary Civil & Military
Establishments.
Sir John Pelly dismisses this part of the subject with the remark,
that he had "always understood that
Lord Grey meant that the Colony
should be established on a Self Supporting principle, and that he knows
of no better mode of procuring the means of defraying the Salaries than
by levying a moderate duty on Imports ⎯"
The Clause referred to by
M Blanshard certainly makes it a condition of the Grant that the entire Civil & Military expenditure
required for the protection & Government of any Settlement or
Settlements to be formed on
the Island should be defrayed by the Company; and a further Clause provides that all monies
received for the
purchase of Lands & all payments in respect of Coal & Minerals should be
applied to the Colonization & Improvement of
the Island.
Mr Merivale in
his Minute
on 6824. expresses a doubt whether the Words "Colonization & Improvement of
the Island" would include the expense of Civil
Gov,
but whatever may be the legal construction which may be put upon the
terms of the Grant, there is I apprehend no authority at present
existing under which Taxes can be levied, seeing that
its there is no
Legislature of any description in the Settlement, and no materials for
framing one ⎯
M Hawes
I am so little familiar with the arrangements at
Vancouver's Island,
that I feel a difficulty in expressing any positive opinion. It appears
to me that unless it has been determined immediately to survey and lay
out a Town, there could be no very grave objection to placing these
buildings at the Company's post which, I suppose, is the only place at
all inhabited? ⎯ As to the question of Taxes, I should think that
Sir J.
Pelly is right, and that the intention was only to have a
self-supporting Colony. Surely it could not be meant that the Company
was to pay the
Gov at
Vancouvers out of their profits on the Fur
Trade in Canada? ⎯ As to the want of a power of legislative action, I do
not know how the facts stand or what were the views of
Gov ⎯
1. As to the buildings being placed in the midst of the Companys
reserves I think it objectionable, unless very clear provision be made
for a free access to them in the event of the surrender of the charter.
2. I think, before any such outlay is made very full information
should be given & a distinct sanction obtained together with the consent
of
the Treasury, considering that they may have to be purchased by the
Crown under the Charter.
3. I should reject the revenue being raised by taxes on imports.
If the fund from Land sales, or rent, or minerals are insufficient to
pay the Civil Expenditure, it may perhaps be the only present resource.
But it should be limited in point of time & amount. But before this is
conceded I think some further information is wanted. What prospect is
there of any Land fund, or any revenue from Coals or Minerals? What is
the proposed cost of the Civil Gov?
4. In reference to
M Barclays Letter — I think there is as much reason for submitting the plans & Estimates involving
the outlay of 2000 £ (now proposed) as there was for the outlay of the 4000£, to the
Gov & Com. — And further that these plans & Estimates should before any expense is incurred
be submitted to the
Sec of State &
the Treasury.
5. I do not now clearly understand how the 2000£ is to be
appropriated. It is not to be laid out on land not purchased — I
suppose therefore the proposed outlay is wholly in the Company's
Land — which I think objectionable.
6. Every step in this transaction requires great care & some impartial authority is
much wanted. The Company has an interest of its own — opposed to the Public Interest.
The Gov is on bad terms with the Company & it is very difficult under present circs to come to any satisfactory conclusion.
7.
Sir J. Pelly passes rather lightly over that part of the Letter
of Sep 30 which insists upon some control over &
inspection of the Public Buildings to be erected, on the part of H.M.
Gov. It is now important to make this clear.
7748
Vancouver's Island
M Peel
As farther complaints have just reached us of the administration of
Vancouver's Island (see 10,075) I forward these papers again, which had been reserved for
L Grey's consideration. I have but little to add to what has been already said.
1. I think with
M Hawes that public works of any magnitude on
the island ought to be erected under the superintend of the
Gov in Council, & the consent of
the Treasury also obtained to them, for the reason
state stated in the last letter on the subject to
Sir J. Pelly (annexed) If (as may be hoped notwithstanding present appearances) the Company can
repay themselves this expenditure out of the sale of land, then
the Treasury has no further interest in the matter, but if it should become necessary at the end
of the
past trading license to resume
the Island while the
Company's expenditure is not repaid,
Gov will have to make it good, & therefore must have this control.
(Probably are really reserved for the Puget's Sound Company—which is said to be the
H.B.C. under another name)
2. I do not know distinctly what is meant by the H.B.C's "reserves." They have a right
to reserve land for public purposes. If they reserve lands for the establishment of
their own farms in order to sell produce at a profit, they ought to pay a "reasonable"
price for the same, that is, debit themselves to the Colony to that amount: & if they
do not do so, it is ground of foreiture in
1854.
3. The locality of the buildings
is matter of natural observation: nevertheless if the
HBC are to be the managers of
the island, it seems more convenient that they should be in the middle of
their "reserves" than anywhere else. It is common in these cases to object to the
separate consequences of a plan when the real objection is to the principles of the
plan itself, which must
be judged by their general merits.
4. The question of the import duty is not free from difficulty. I do not think the
meaning of the grant was to bind the Co. to be at the expense of colonizing
the island without
any regular means of
remuneration & simply as a trading speculation. And it is not clear on
the words of the Commission & Instructions whether such a power is not
given to the
Gov & Council provisorily, until the Assembly can be constituted. But the general idea
of the establishment certainly was,
that it was to be a free colony. Doubts would be entertained (especially after the
discussion of last session) whether after the general grant of a Constitution the
Crown itself could authorize the
imposition of taxes by a Governor. And I think that inasmuch as there
is a fund — the land sales & minerals — devoted to the "Colonization &
improvement" of
the island, this is the
source from which preliminary expenses, such as that of governing the colony until
a legislature with power of taxation can be established, were really meant to come:
if the necessary expenses exceed this, the Company have bound themselves to furnish
them in the first instance.
At all events I should certainly not advise acceding to this scheme
of
Sir J. Pelly's without the advice of the A. & Sol.
Gen. (The
H.B.C. might levy port dues, &, for the use of their wharfs & landing
places: but, in their own right, clearly nothing more.)
5. I will just mention that (with reference to something said in
10,075) the Co. have no monopoly of the sale of articles of supply to
ships & or to their own settlers in the island legally, though
practically it is probable enough they possess one.
The last of these letters must be transmitted to the
Hudson's Bay
Company at the same time observing with reference to the former that I
am by no means
satisfied with respect to the manner in
wh the island has been managed by the Company. ⎯ I hope that with a view both to the interest of
the Company itself & for that of the settlers more efficient
measures may be taken for its colonizat & for improving the condit of the inhabitants. ⎯ The chief points which call for observat are the following. ⎯
1 As to public works. ⎯ I
think it is quite
necessary that the government
sh have some control over what is done in this way for the reasons noticed in the former
minutes, but on the other hand having regard to the very irregular means
of communicat with
the island & the great delay which
w arise from
the requiring the previous sanct of
the Treasury before buildings are undertaken I think it will be enough to say that the
Gov must send a full report upon all works that he contemplates & must furnish to this
depart accounts of the expenditure incurred. ⎯
2 With regard to the reserve of land for the Company, I agree with
M Merivale that if the Comp reserve land for any but strictly public purposes they are bound to credit the colony
with a
price for
the land equal to what they
w charge private individuals, & to spend this money in the necessary expenses of the
settlement & expense
either in sending out emigrants (who clearly
sh be married men) or
in open roads & making more land accessible. ⎯ It is obvious that no private individuals
can be expected to buy land
[…] if all the land most valuable from its posit is reserved by the Company for their own use with applying the price which
w have been charged for it if sold for the benefit of the Colony. ⎯
3 With regard to import duties — I considered it to have been clearly understood at
the time the
arrangement with the Company was made, that no such duties c be imposed until the number of
inhabitants had increased enough to admit of the calling
together of an
Ass, I apprehend that there clearly is no authority but that of Parl or of a representative Ass by which taxes can be levied
in
the island, this
sh be pointed out. ⎯
4 On the subject of the alleged monopoly of the Co their special attent must be called to the statements which have been made,
remind them that they are not legally
entitled to such a monopoly &
expressing my hope that they have not indirectly endeavoured to
establish one by refusing to traders who might be inclined to compete
with them,
[…] ground in suitable situat for build stores & shops,
or by denying them any other facilities for carrying on trade which it
may be in the power of the Company to with-hold. ⎯ Any such proceeding I
sh regard as a great abuse & a departure from the spirit
if not from the words of the agreement entered into with the
Gov call which
w call for its intervent. ⎯ It may be added that I have reason to believe that ow to the advantageous market for coals & also for
Agricultural produce created by
California I have reason to believe that there
w be
[…] a considerable influx of settlers into
V.C. Island if the Hudson's bay Co
w give them the encouragement which it is both their duty & their obvious policy to
afford. ⎯