This document contains mentions of Indigenous Peoples. The authors of these documents
often perpetuate a negative perspective of Indigenous Peoples and it is important
to look critically at these mentions. They sometimes use terminology that is now considered
hurtful and offensive. To learn more about modern terminology pertaining to Indigenous
Peoples, Indigenous ways of knowing, and decolonization, please refer to the Glossary of terms.
Douglas addresses the CO’s concerns over his Fraser River policies. While he defends the HBC’s exclusive trading rights with Aboriginals in the region, he does acknowledge that
these terms have been virtually abrogated by later regulations. He also promises to discontinue the regulation requiring the pre-payment of mining licenses and head money
on the persons going to Fraser’s River.
The minutes debate who in the CO can most appropriately assess Douglas’s report.
1. I have the honor to acknowledge the receipt of your
Despatch No 4, of the 16th
July.
1
2. In the midst of the varied cares and anxieties that press upon
me in the present conjuncture, it is no small consolation to learnfrom from
your Despatch that Her Majesty's Government feel assured of my zeal in
the public service, and offer their firm support, in the performance of
the arduous duties consequent on my present position, and I beg
leave to say that I feel the value of that support, and deeply
grateful for the confidence reposed in me.
3. I observe with satisfaction that Her Majesty's Government
were engaged in conducting through Parliament, a measure for
the establishment of regular government in the gold
country,
2
and were devising means for affording me thesupport
support of a military force.
4. I have perused your remarks defining the extent of the Powers
conferred on the Governor of Vancouver's Island by the Royal Commission
and observe that you approve of the appointment of a revenue officer, to
prevent the landing of prohibited articles in Fraser's River, and
instruct me to maintain the principle that the navigation of Fraser's
River itself, above the mouth, is open to British vessels only, and that
American or other foreign vessels if admitted to navigate that river
should be required to take out a license; your instructions on thosepoints
points being in strict accordance with our present regulations.
5. I observe also from your Despatch, that the rights of trade made
over to the Hudson's Bay Company are limited to the trade with the Indian
Tribes.
We have always hitherto given a more extended application
to those rights, believing from the circumstance of the country,
being inhabited by Indians alone, and from its not being open
for settlement to white men, that the intention of Parliament
in granting the License, was to make overthe the whole trade of the
country to the Hudson's Bay Company.
6. That construction of the rights of the Hudson's Bay Company was
strengthened by the following passage in His Grace [the Duke] of
Newcastle's Despatch No 12, of the 22nd of October
1853,
3
on which the proclamation issued on the 8th of May last was based.
With regard to the third subject, the traffic of the Americans with the
Indians, you are of course aware that the Hudson's Bay Company are
legally entitled to this trade, to the exclusion of all other persons,
whetherBritish" British or Foreign, you are therefore clearly at liberty to take
such steps as may have the effect of punishing persons who infringe their
rights. But I am of opinion that it would be prudent previously to issue
a proclamation warning all persons against the consequences of such an
infringement of the Hudson's Bay Company's rights, and also apprizing
foreigners that they are precluded from fishing within three miles of the
shore.
7. We shall however in future act upon your instructions,
abrogating andamending amending without delay all existing regulations
repugnant thereto. The proclamation of the 8th of May was
in fact virtually abrogated by later
regulations,
4
permitting in the first place, the entrance of boats and vessels under
sufferance, and afterwards allowing the importation of all kinds of goods
into Fraser's River, on the payment of an ad valorem duty on the
goods of 10 per cent, as mentioned in the 11th paragraph of
my Despatch No 39 of the 9th of
September.
5
8. The object of that Proclamation which fromthe the pressure of
business my despatches have but imperfectly explained to Her Majesty's
Government, was not solely to protect the interests of the Hudson's Bay
Company, for in the circumstances of the country, that was a simple
impossibility, but I sought to establish thereby a legal control, over
the multitude of foreigners who were entering the country, and who
notwithstanding our precautions to the contrary, have been with
difficulty restrained from taking possession of and occupying as
squatters all the valuable land on Fraser's River. I felt that a step of
that kind could not be legally carried into effectin in my position as
Governor of Vancouver's Island, but while holding that position and
representing, at the same time, the Hudson's Bay
Company
6
I fancied that important public measure would violate no law, and
therefore from its evident necessity meet with your approval and support.
9. The arrangement with the Pacific Mail Steam Ship
Company
7
of which you disapprove, was never carried into effect; but the other
foreign vessels employed on Fraser's River were likewise bound by the
same conditions offered to that Company.Those Those regulations have by
subsequent changes fallen into disuse, in so much as they are connected
with the privileges or tend to promote the interests of the Hudson's Bay
Company.
10. We shall forthwith discontinue the regulation requiring
the pre-payment of mining licenses and head money on persons going
to Fraser's River, in consequence of your instructions to that
effect, and in all other respects we shall conform strictly to
the instructions contained in your Despatch.
Lord Carnarvon
12180 has not reached me with this. As this is an answer to despatches
which were very fully considered, but at a time when I was not present,
I do not feel competent to offer any useful advice.
= Act to Provide for.
Lytton introduced the Bill to Provide for the Government of New Caledonia
in the House of Commons on 1 July 1858. It was read a second time and
debated on 8, 12, and 13 July, and a third time on 19 July. The bill
was given first reading in the House of Lords on 20 July, second reading
on 26 July, third reading on 29 July, and received royal assent on 2
August, when Parliament was prorogued.
Hansard's Parliamentary Debates, Third Series, vol. 91, 1858.
= Douglas's multiple responsibilities:
Douglas's position as governor of VI and also agent for the HBC in
discharging their duties as proprietors. Details needed??
See footnote in Douglas to Stanley, 19 May 1858, No. 23, 6667, CO 305/9, p. 87.