There are some strong presumptions against
M Langford. The
unreasonable delay in making his
complaints, as minuted on 5078, which
gave room for an idea that he was
cooking up charges: again the facts to his discredit which are
mentioned in the Governor's despatch of
23 Aug 1862. The
concluding sentence of his present letter is more peremptory than it
ought to be, and betokens an aggressive disposition.
On the other hand it is awkward that the Governor in his
despatch should have held out expectations of a further report which
has never followed. I think it very probable that it may not have
been his own fault, and that he may have had difficulties with
Chief
Justice Begbie, who has shown recently that he is not fond of
incidental and irregular challenges to defend his judicial conduct.