Hudson's Bay House
                     
                  
               1st December 1852
               
               Sir,
                
            
            
            
               I have the honour to acknowledge the receipt of 
Mr T.F. Elliot's
               letter of the 
3rd Instant [ultimo], addressed to 
Mr Barclay,
               Secretary of the Hudson's Bay Company, enclosing an Extract of a letter
               from a gentleman residing at 
Vancouver's Island, relative to the
               condition and prospects of that Settlement, on which I have to make the
               following observations.
               
               Before proceeding to notice what is stated in this Extract I must
               respectfully submit that when the conduct of the Governor and Committee
               of the Hudson's Bay Company is thus complained of it would have been
               more satisfactory if the name of the writer had been communicated.
               
            
            
            
               There can be no doubt that the system represented to be followed by
               the Government of the United States in the disposal of land in the
               
Oregon territory must retard the settlement

 of 
Vancouver's Island, and
               with the attraction of the gold district of California, make it
               difficult to retain the service of labourers at almost any rate of
               wages, but it is evident that no course of conduct on the part of the
               
               Hudson's Bay Company could have prevented this result, and the remedy
               suggested by the writer of the letter would tend to enhance the rate of
               wages, and make it more difficult, or rather impossible, for persons of
               capital to cultivate the land or engage in any business that required
               the employment of labourers; for men are not disposed to become hired
               servants when they can cultivate their own land.
               
               When the Hudson's Bay Company undertook to conduct the settlement
               of 
the Island, the principle of the measures to be taken for that
               purpose were fully discussed with the Secretary of State for the
               Colonies, and the price of the land to Settlers, and the condition of
               bringing a certain number of labourers into 
the Island were submitted to
               and approved of by him, the plan being considered the best that could be

               devised to secure a bona fide cultivation of the land. 
               
                  
                     
                     Mr Merivale
                     .par
                     Would it not be as well to ask the opinion of the 
Govr on this
                     point. As we complain of the Company doing nothing, it might be
                     desirable for us not to neglect the small opening they give us of
                     promoting the interests of the Settlement. See P. 2 of M
r Staine's
                     Letter.
                     
 
                  
                The price of the
               land is 20
s/- per acre, of this 1/10
th belongs to the Hudson's
               Bay Company for their trouble in conducting the sales, and the
               9/10
ths is held in Trust for Colonial purposes.
               
               With respect to the farms in progress of being established by the
               Puget Sound Company, this obligation of bringing in labourers has been
               more than fulfilled, and the cases in which it has been relaxed are
               those where the purchasers of land were already resident in the country,
               and, from their having been in the employment of the Company, it was
               expected they might influence the labourers, whose term of service
               expired, to take service with them for the cultivation of their lands.
               Under existing circumstances it may perhaps be expedient not to insist
               on the purchasers of land, to some limited extent say not exceeding 100
               acres, bringing in labourers, and if you should be of this opinion, and
               shall signify the same, the Directors of the Hudson's Bay Company will
               adopt that rule for the future.
            
            
            
               It is not true that the

 Hudson's Bay Company exercise any monopoly
               in 
Vancouver Island. The fishing of the seas, inlets, and rivers is
               free to all the inhabitants, and the importation of goods is free to all
               the world, and in no case where parties have applied for room in the
               Company's ships has it been refused, except for Spirits. The Indians are numerous,
               and, unless the intercourse with them is carefully and
               prudently conducted, would be dangerous; for this reason, as well as for
               the sake of the Indians themselves, the use of Spirits has been
               prevented, or rather discouraged, as far as the power of the Company can
               be exercised. But the Company neither claims the right of, nor
               practically exercises any, exclusive dealings with the Indians of 
the
                  Island.
               
               The Island is in no respect given over "bound hand and foot" to the
               Hudson's Bay Company, except that it is only from them that a title can
               be obtained for the land, but the terms on which land can be obtained is
               published, and in no case has an

 application for land been refused on
               those terms which are equally applied to all applicants.
               
 
            
            
            
               The writer of the letter asserts "that persons have been driven off
               
the Island by the illiberal policy of the Government, literally in one
               instance, which I am well acquainted with, by the jealousy of the
               Company's agents here, &c." I never heard of any thing that could
               justify this assertion, and I do not believe that 
Mr Douglas, who
               holds Her Majesty's Commission as Governor of 
the Island, would act upon
               any such motives. But if the case and circumstances are brought forward
               in a tangible shape by naming the party and the accuser, the strictest
               enquiry shall be made, and the result reported to you. Perhaps the
               better course would be for you to call officially upon the Governor, who
               is appointed by the Crown, for an explanation, if you think the bare
               assertion of the writer of the letter is worthy of enquiry.
               
               From all these circumstances the animus of the writer may be
               inferred.
               
            
            
            
               It is true that no Church or Chapel has been built, but authority
               has been given to 
Governor Douglas to do so when he finds it expedient,
               and can accomplish it. The plan of a Church has been sent home, but no
               estimate of the expence, otherwise they would have been submitted for
               your consideration, as is required to be done before being carried into
               execution. In the meantime there are the means of having Divine Service
               in one of the buildings in 
Fort Victoria, and I believe our
               instructions, that there should be Divine Service regularly, are duly
               attended to.
               
               In 
1848 the 
Revd Robert J. Staines was engaged to conduct a
               school for boys, and his wife one for girls. The officers in the
               service of the Company subscribed £340 p[er] annum towards this
               establishment for the sake of education

 for their children. The
               Hudson's Bay Company granted £100 p[er] annum to 
Mr Staines to act as
               Chaplain to the Company at their establishment at 
Fort Victoria, and the
               Fur trade branch of the Company grant him another £100 p[er] annum as a
               contribution towards the Schools.
               
               The Governor and Committee certainly have not assigned a place for
               a burying ground, conceiving that this would of course be done by the
               authorities on the Spot.
               
            
            
            
               I have the honor to be Sir
               
               Your obedient Humble S
t
               
               A. Colvile
               
               Governor
               
               
               
               
               Minutes by CO staff
               
                
                  
                  
                     Mr Merivale
                     I do not see what use can be made of this letter. The Company seem
                     annoyed, & perhaps with some reason, that the name of the Writer of a
                     letter reflecting upon their Administration should be withheld. 
Mr
                        Staines receives a portion of his emoluments from the Company and it is
                     to be hoped that his interests will not be ultimately prejudiced should
                     they discover that he is the Author?
                     
 
                  
                  
                  
                  
                  
                  
                     Put by. The price of £1 put upon land in 
V.I. was certainly part
                     of the original scheme, & thought at the time a wise measure (the
                     Wakefield notions being then still popular). But it is not required by
                     the Crown grant, which only directs a "reasonable price" to be put upon
                     land by the Company.
                     
 
               
               
                
                  
                  
                     Mr Merivale
                     Please to look at a pencil note of mine at P. 3 of 11,004—before the
                     Letter is put by as directed.
                     
 
                  
                  
                   
                  
                  
                     Mr Blackwood has pointed out a passage at p. 3 which makes me
                     think it desirable not to "put by" as I at first minuted, but to
                     transmit this letter to the L
d & Em
n Board, & ask their opinion of
                     the suggestion contained in that passage.
                     
 
                  
                  
                  
                   
            
            
               Documents enclosed with the main document (not transcribed)
               
                
                  
                  
                     Draft, Colonial Office to 
Colvile, 
14 February 1853, stating that
                     
Newcastle had no objection to relaxing the regulation requiring
                     purchasers of less than 100 acres of land to bring in labourers.
                     
 
            
            
            
            
            
               
                  People in this document
                  
                        Barclay, Doctor Archibaldus
                  
                        Blackwood, Arthur Johnstone
                  Colvile,  Andrew Wedderburn
                  
                        Cuffe, 3rd Earl of Desart John Otway O'Conner
                        
                  
                        Douglas, Sir James
                  
                        Elliot, Thomas Frederick
                  Jadis, Vane
                  Merivale, Herman
                  Pakington, Captain John Somerset
                  Pelham-Clinton, 5th Duke of Newcastle Henry Pelham Fiennes
                  
                        Staines, Reverend Robert John
                        
                
               
                  Places in this document
                  Fraser River
                  Old Fort Langley
                  Oregon Territory, or Columbia District
                  Vancouver Island
                  Victoria