I quite agree in the principle of giving the Colony some spiritual
assistance but on grounds of expediency I am afraid it is questionable.
For this last reason
Sir E. Lytton decided against a Colonial Chaplain &
only agreed to the free passage in the
Thames City because though
indirectly it was equivalent to pecuniary aid it was not actually a grant
of money
w w appear on the Estimates. I do not see how, if the
£100 suggested or any sum be allowed to the Col. Ch. S., pecuniary
aid to
the S.P.G. or to other religious bodies can be refused, or why we s
confine ourselves to so small a sum. I
w for my own part gladly
adopt a different course and give effective aid towards a religious
establishment in the new Colony but modern policy has condemned this &
rendered it impossible, and the difference between £100 and £1000 is
merely I apprehend a question of degree. I am afraid that we cannot
comply with the application but it is for
Sir E. Lytton to decide.