We have by this desp. [learned] of the formal
                     appointment of 
M Crickmer by the B of
                     
London to an office called "the Colonial Chaplaincy" of which
                     the Sec. of State knows nothing, but which if it existed at
                     all 
w be a appointment by the Colonial Minister & not by
                     the bishop of London. It 
w be therefore desirable to know
                     1 whether the B of London did ever give such
                     credentials—2 to see copies of them—3 to have it
                     distinctly understood that they convey no authority under which 
M
                        Crickmer can 

claim particular power or privileges.
                     
 
                  
                  
                     The history of the case is this—the S.P.G. applied last year
                     for assistance to their endeavour which they were then making
                     to meet the religious destitution of the Colony. We
                     declined on the ground of a want of funds but offered their
                     missionary a free passage which was accepted. The Church
                     Missionary So
c then in turn made the same request
                     which was answered in the same terms but they declined the
                     passage. 
M Gammage, who was
                     
first appointed has sailed—but meanwhile it appears that 
M
                        Crickmer has anticipated him by going out on his own account & armed
                     with the B of London's credentials seems likely to
                     monopolise whatever ecclesiastical preferment—little
                     enough I s think—there may be in the Colony &—which
                     mainly concerns us—

to assume an official position as
                     
the Colonial Chaplain which the Sec. of State has
                     not conferred. It must be borne in mind that there is now
                     a bishop for 
B. Columbia and that no ecclesiastical
                     arrangement ought to be agreed to as permanent until he can
                     reach his own See and decide for himself. I cannot but
                     suspect in this affair some desire on the part of 
M Crickmer
                     to forestall every other clergyman who might be bound for the
                     Colony & to secure for himself a priority of position—which
                     it 
w be very undesirable to concede without full consideration.
                     
 
                  
                  
                     I 
w therefore guard this point in your
                     reply to the Gov desp. and I 
w write to the B of
                     London to ask for information as to the nature of the
                     credentials which he is said to have given to 
M Crickmer.