 
                  
                  Sir F. Rogers
                     Governor Seymour here sends home his Estimates & Appropriation
                     Ordinance for 
1867—the latter having passed as far back as 
March
                        last. The 
3 Dec is rather late to receive the Estimates for the
                     year, & tho' the union of the two Colonies at so late a period
                     of last year no doubt prevented an earlier passing of the Estimates,
                     it need not have been necessary that it should take

 so many months
                     to send them home when passed—especially with the very meagre
                     information supplied.
                     
 
                  
                  
                     It appears that the Estimated Revenue for 1867 is $675,350,
                     against $592,459 the revenue of 1865—it further appears that the
                     estimated Expenditure for 1867 is $701,710—against $1,096,036 for
                     the two Colonies in 1865.
                     
                  
                  
                     The Auditor Generals mem shews in what respects the Estimate
                     of Expenditure differs from previous Expenditure.
                     
                  
                  
                     I see nothing calling for special observation in the Items—& it is
                     now rather

 late to deal with them.
                     
                     But I believe the Finances of 
B. Columbia are under consideration.
                     
 
                  
                  
                     M Adderley
                     There can be no doubt—considering the state of the Finances of 
B.C. that
                     this statement 
sh have reached England long ago. Now, I think,
                     that having been delayed 
from March to September, the 
Gov ought to
                     have accompanied [it] by a Statement informing the Secretary of State
                     how far the estimate has been borne out by the experience of the
                     2 or 3 first quarters of the year.
                     
 
                  
                  
                     The main point is the comparison of Totals
                     
                     
                     
                     
                        
                           |  | Revenue | $ | Exp | 
                        
                        
                           | 1865 | 592,459 | 1,096,036 |  | 
                        
                        
                           | 1867 | 675,350 | 701,710 |  | 
                        
                        
                           | excess | 82,891 | 394,326 | decrease | 
                        
                        
                           |  |  |  | 82,891 | 
                        
                        
                           |  |  |  | 477,217 | 
                        

                     
                     shewing a difference of 477,217 dollars and this, as I understand
                     does not shew the full reduction of expenditures, because the
                     estimates of 
1867 include $170,000 in repayment of Temporary Loans,
                     while nothing of the kind is included in the expenditure of 
1865.
                     
                     The great reduction is of course in public works—where
                     the difference of the two Estimates is about $300,000.
                     
                  
                  
                     This of course will have to go to Treasury eventually. But
                     the information which it gives should first be embodied in the
                     statement 
w is now being prepared respecting 
B.C. finance.
                     I 
w therefore request that it may be retained for this purpose.